Re: [Rawhide] Build system with updated systemd weird message

I confirm about the guessing about missing "include " which possibly came from the mass build. After applying the patch, the build was successful. Patch submitted upstream on https://developer.blender.org/D17151 Thanks Mamoru! Luya ___ devel mailing l

Re: -fno-omit-frame-pointer does not work as advertised

* Demi Marie Obenour: > What about the new SFrame unwind info? It has the same limitation as DWARF: there's no mainline kernel implementation for profiling or bpftrace. Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscr

Re: Proposal: dnf should offer to update all of the dependencies of any package installed or updated

* Gordon Messmer: > On 2023-01-28 13:03, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >>> ...or "(libfoo.so.2()(64bit) with foo-libs >= x.y.z)", where x.y.z is the >>> version of the package that provides libfoo.so.2 in the build root, which is >>> an idea that's growing on me. >> This is indeed a shortcomi

Re: updating cmark to 0.30

Thanks for this feedback. Not sure what happened :-( but I am rebuilding them now (mkvtoolnix was expected). Cheers, Jens ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora

Fedora CoreOS Meeting Minutes 2023-01-25

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-01-25/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-01-25-16.31.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-01-25/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-01-25-16.31.txt Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 4:09 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 29. 01. 23 18:15, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > > I would like to request exemptions for: > > > > llvm11 jistone, petersen, > sergesanspaille, tstellar > > llvm12

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230129.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230128.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230129.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 11 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 103 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 26.49 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: [Rawhide] Build system with updated systemd weird message

Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 2023/01/30 5:05: Thanks for the info. That setup impact some subcommand on both make and ninja accordingly, hence the last line: ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed. See build.log for details: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/79/96810079/build.log

Looking for co-maintainer on EPEL Blender

Hello team, As some EPEL users wish to get Blender on that repository, we are looking for a co-maintainer for that branch. The starting point will be f36 spec[1] file with minimal dependencies possible [2] for future increments using Blender 3.3 LTS as reference. Thanks for the help Refer

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On 29. 01. 23 18:15, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:56 PM Miro Hrončok > wrote: If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, please let me know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for that. I would like

Re: Orphaning lizardfs

That's wonderful news!  I've moved roles since adding it to Fedora and no longer use it in my day job, so I'm more than happy to let you have it! Thanks, Jonathan On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 21:25 -0500, JT wrote: > I can pick this package up if you're stepping back.  The lizards devs > are planning o

Re: [Rawhide] Build system with updated systemd weird message

On 2023-01-29 07:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 01:50:21AM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: Hello team, When building a package i.e. Blender as an exampleon Rawhide repository, the following message displayed: DEBUG util.py:445: /proc/ is not mounted, but requi

datamash long term FTBFS - how to apply for maintainership before it's retired

Hello, Datamash was mentioned in the last long term FTBFS announcement mail. I know how to fix the datamash build [1], however, its maintainer is currently inactive. [2] I think I could manage to maintain just another Fedora package (my fas handle is: gsauthof) - so, what is the best way to requ

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:56 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, > please let me know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for > that. I would like to request exemptions for: llvm11 jisto

Re: SPDX Statistics - Pavel edition

On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 11:41 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Tip: do you want to audit licenses in your tarball? Unpack the tarball and > try: > > dnf install askalono-cli > > askalono crawl /path/to/directory Regarding askalono: I had not heard of it prior to getting involved in this whole Fe

SPDX Statistics - Pavel edition

Two weeks ago we had: * 23030 spec files in Fedora * 29390 license tags in all spec files * 22766 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet * 8986 tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx` Today we have: * 23036 spec files in Fedora * 29407 license tags in all spec files

Re: systemd-resolved package overwrite /etc/resolv.conf again

On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 09:36:26AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2023-01-21 at 10:06 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > This is only supposed to happen if (a) upgrading from systemd < > > 246.1-1, which you're not doing, or (b) installing systemd for the > > first time, which you're no

Re: [Rawhide] Build system with updated systemd weird message

On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 01:50:21AM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Hello team, > > When building a package i.e. Blender as an exampleon Rawhide repository, the > following message displayed: > > DEBUG util.py:445: /proc/ is not mounted, but required for successful > operation of systemd-tmpfi

Review request: perl-String-License, perl-Test2-Tools-Command

Hi licensecheck-3.3.8 once again grew some new dependencies, reviews here: perl-Test2-Tools-Command - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2165335 perl-String-License - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2165336 Happy to review in exchange. Thanks Sandro __

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for rmattes / update libQGLViewer to 2.9.1

Susi Lehtola wrote on 2023/01/29 17:13: Hi, does anyone know how to contact Rich Mattes? They maintain libQGLViewer, which was last updated five years ago * Sun Aug 12 2018 Rich Mattes - 2.6.4-1 - Update to release 2.6.4, with upstream fix for qreal on armv7 (rhbz#1556028) - Remove upstream p

Package review needed - swap welcome

Hi, to update Celestia package I need to add a new dependency celestia-data. The package review [1] was stuck waiting for a new license to be approved by SPDX upstream, which is happened recently [2]. The new license ("JPL-image") has not yet been added to the Fedora accepted list [3], but I think

Re: Orphaning lizardfs

Fixing the FTBFS is rather trivial (yet another victim of GCC13 header shenanigans) and I've already created a patch for this, but I didn't want to pick up the package since upstream activity since rather low. If you're saying that the project isn't dead yet, then I'd be willing to pick this up

[Rawhide] Build system with updated systemd weird message

Hello team, When building a package i.e. Blender as an exampleon Rawhide repository, the following message displayed: DEBUG util.py:445: /proc/ is not mounted, but required for successful operation of systemd-tmpfiles. Please mount /proc/. Alternatively, consider using the --root= or --imag

Re: Proposal: dnf should offer to update all of the dependencies of any package installed or updated

On 2023-01-29 00:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: The version doesn't have to be major.minor.micro, though.  The dependency generator only needs to get the version of the package that provides the .so, and use that version.  As long as changes within a so version are always backward compati

Non-responsive maintainer check for rmattes / update libQGLViewer to 2.9.1

Hi, does anyone know how to contact Rich Mattes? They maintain libQGLViewer, which was last updated five years ago * Sun Aug 12 2018 Rich Mattes - 2.6.4-1 - Update to release 2.6.4, with upstream fix for qreal on armv7 (rhbz#1556028) - Remove upstream patch and update library names and there h

Re: updating cmark to 0.30

On 17. 01. 23 6:55, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: Currently we have an old version of cmark in Fedora: version 0.29. I had several requests to update it to the latest release 0.30.2 from 2021. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974335

Re: Proposal: dnf should offer to update all of the dependencies of any package installed or updated

On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 06:12:11PM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 2023-01-28 13:03, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > ...or "(libfoo.so.2()(64bit) with foo-libs >= x.y.z)", where x.y.z is the > > > version of the package that provides libfoo.so.2 in the build root, which > > > is > > > a