On Sun, 2022-12-18 at 16:07 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 18/12/2022 12:20, Frank Crawford wrote:
> > Can anyone explain what is going on?
>
> Fedora no longer has i686 mirrors, so COPR or mock use Koji's
> buildroot.
> It was recently removed due to F35 EOL so you can no longer bui
On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 3:29 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 18/12/2022 15:34, drago01 wrote:
> > Why would they? The patents apply to the algorithm, not to any API.
>
> Help in circumventing patents.
Your lawyer may vary in regards to the advice
they provide as to an organization's exp
On 18/12/2022 16:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
No, they cannot. If you try, you get redirected to a wiki page
explaining why you can't.
Ah, sorry, my bad. I haven't tried downloading.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing l
On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 10:29 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 18/12/2022 15:34, drago01 wrote:
> > Why would they? The patents apply to the algorithm, not to any API.
>
> Help in circumventing patents. For the same reason, the RPM Fusion
> repository can't be preloaded.
>
> But technical
On 18/12/2022 15:14, Michael J Gruber wrote:
%autorelease needs the git history, and you are building from dist-git, so that
part is fine.
COPR has Git history.
Example:
https://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/xvitaly/matrix/neochat.git/log/
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@eas
On 18/12/2022 15:34, drago01 wrote:
Why would they? The patents apply to the algorithm, not to any API.
Help in circumventing patents. For the same reason, the RPM Fusion
repository can't be preloaded.
But technically MPEG LA still can sue Fedora because unsigned builds can
be downloaded fr
* Michael J. Gruber:
> I'm afraid you're not holding it right ;)
>
> %autorelease needs the git history, and you are building from
> dist-git, so that part is fine. But you are not using `Release:
> %autorelease` but, instead, there are additional tags in there. And -
> depending on your view on o
On 18/12/2022 12:20, Frank Crawford wrote:
Can anyone explain what is going on?
Fedora no longer has i686 mirrors, so COPR or mock use Koji's buildroot.
It was recently removed due to F35 EOL so you can no longer build F35
i686 packages.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org
* Frank Crawford:
> I'm trying to build a package (rdiff-backup) for multiple
> architectures and releases of Fedora, and all of them work, except
> fedora-35-i686, which comes up with the following complaint:
>
> This system is not registered with an entitlement server. You can use
> subscription
* Orion Poplawski:
> Well, it turns out that openmpi is intercepting the mmap call, so it
> seems to be an incompatibility with how it is doing that now. Still
> no idea what, but hopefully openmpi upstream will have some ideas.
It's also possible this is a kernel bug. EFAULT is not among the
e
On Sunday, December 18, 2022, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 18/12/2022 06:18, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>
>> Could Fedora ship a shim library that exposed the same API and used
>> dlopen() internally?
>>
>
> I doubt. Lawyers will treat this as a patents viol
I'm afraid you're not holding it right ;)
%autorelease needs the git history, and you are building from dist-git, so that
part is fine. But you are not using `Release: %autorelease` but, instead, there
are additional tags in there. And - depending on your view on old vs. new
version names - thi
Folks,
I'm trying to build a package (rdiff-backup) for multiple architectures
and releases of Fedora, and all of them work, except fedora-35-i686,
which comes up with the following complaint:
This system is not registered with an entitlement server. You can use
subscription-manager to register.
On Sat, Dec 17, 2022, 20:59 Florian Weimer wrote:
> It looks like COPR always produces 1 for %autorelease. Is this a known
> issue? Is there a way around it?
>
> Here's a build that shows this:
>
> <
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fweimer/modernc-1/build/5152562/>
>
> Thanks,
> Flo
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221217.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221218.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 50
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 349.88 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On 18/12/2022 06:18, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
Could Fedora ship a shim library that exposed the same API and used
dlopen() internally?
I doubt. Lawyers will treat this as a patents violation.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
__
On 17/12/2022 20:59, Florian Weimer wrote:
It looks like COPR always produces 1 for %autorelease. Is this a known
issue?
Yes. rpmautospec works correctly only in Fedora Koji. In rpmbuild, mock,
COPR, it will always use 1.
Is there a way around it?
I didn't find it, so I reverted my packa
17 matches
Mail list logo
