Re: Heads up! OpenImageIO 2.4 series coming to rawhide

On 2022-10-11 5:37 p.m., Richard Shaw wrote: The side tag update has been submitted, feel free to update the release notes if you'd like. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-11f61b3a96 Thanks, Richard Than

Re: Heads up! OpenImageIO 2.4 series coming to rawhide

The side tag update has been submitted, feel free to update the release notes if you'd like. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-11f61b3a96 Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an em

Re: status update on "ostree native containers"

On 9/27/22 5:08 PM, Colin Walters wrote: But back to Fedora CoreOS, another thing that's happened recently is https://github.com/coreos/coreos-layering-examples has matured and has many functional examples of using this. We're getting increasingly close to the point where I want to call this all

Re: status update on "ostree native containers"

On Tue, Oct 11, 2022, at 4:22 PM, Micah Abbott wrote: > So I took a few hours here and there over the last few days to build a > small project using the ostree native container functionality. I wanted > to create a variant of Fedora CoreOS (FCOS) that has the Image Builder > (https://www.osbui

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

Added --allowerasing I'll have to wait for the 'beid-release', usually a few weeks after the official Fedora-release. Removing dependent packages: gufw noarch 21.04.0-2@rpmsphere-noarch

Re: status update on "ostree native containers"

I've been following the development of the ostree native containers pretty closely, first as a member of the CoreOS team and now as a member of the RHEL for Edge team, but never had a chance to really try it myself. So I took a few hours here and there over the last few days to build a small proje

Re: [side tags] Undesired automatic side-tag removal happened - how to deal with it in the future?

Zdenek Dohnal kirjoitti 10.10.2022 klo 11.17: However the side tag: f38-build-side-58658 got automatically deleted, even when it had builds connected to it already. Documentation [1] does not mention any automatic side-tags cleanup and its deadlines. [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US

Re: Fedora Developer Portal update

On 10/11/22 20:15, Jarek Prokop wrote: Hi all, Fedora Developer Portal has a new update, it should be visible in a few hours. Most notable changes: Website:   * The "Edit this page" and "Report an issue" buttons spawn a new tab instead of redirecting now. Updates:   * https://developer.f

Fedora Developer Portal update

Hi all, Fedora Developer Portal has a new update, it should be visible in a few hours. Most notable changes: Website:   * The "Edit this page" and "Report an issue" buttons spawn a new tab instead of redirecting now. Updates:   * https://developer.stg.fedoraproject.org/tech/languages/pytho

Re: stuck s390x builds in koji

On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 11:35:45AM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Tuesday, 11 October 2022 at 11:27, Dan Horák wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 11:18:12 +0200 > > Luna Jernberg wrote: > > > On 10/11/22, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > > > wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > It seems tha

Re: [INPUT REQUESTED] Re: F38 proposal: Node.js Repackaging (Self-Contained Change proposal)

I have not used nodejs for development in quite a while so cannot respond from an involved user perspective. Given that context, I concur with Dan's reasoning and choices. On a more meta note, Fedora has at least 3 mechanisms to provide multiple versions of some component for a given release - alt

Any updates on Cassandra / MongoDB / Groovy?

Hey devel list! Anyone knows how to update the contents of our Fedora Developer Portal pages? Already asked once here: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/N3VCUO7KB72GBTEIE5DDLQDY7RQDOF7F/ Deprecation changes announced here: https://lists.fedorapro

soname bump (Rawhide): libtraceevent libtracefs kernelshark

Hi, I'm updating libtraceevent, libtracefs to newer versions and rebuilding the dependencies libtracecmd, trace-cmd, kernelshark. This caused soname bump as the following libtraceevent.so to 1.6.3 libtracefs.so to 1.5.0 And also the following from kernelshark, although they are expected not

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Thanks ! Guess I'll take it then. Le 10/10/2022 à 22:04, Miro Hrončok a écrit : On 10. 10. 22 21:05, Lyes Saadi wrote: Does anyone know what happened to python-yapsy? https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2866 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Source-git SIG

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Source-git SIG on 2022-10-12 from 14:30:00 to 15:30:00 GMT At meet.google.com/mic-otnv-kse The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Fedora source-git SIG Agenda: https://pagure.io/fedora-source-git/sig/issues?tags=meeting&status=Open

Orphaned some obsolete / unused (by me) Rust applications

Hi all, I have orphaned a few Rust applications that ended up unmaintained after Igor dropped his packages. I use none of these applications myself, having a maintainer that actually uses these packages would be great. However, some of the orphaned packages have dead upstreams - it might be good

Re: Handle sysroot.readyonly=true migration in other rpm-ostree Fedora(s)

On Mon, Oct 10, 2022, at 7:41 AM, Antonio Murdaca wrote: > Hi folks, in rpm-ostree based systems like fedora iot I would love to > handle the migration process similar to what happens today in > silverblue et all wrt sysroot.readonly > https://pagure.io/workstation-ostree-config/blob/main/f/po

Re: DNF5 Blockers

On 10/11/22 15:17, Stephen Smoogen wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 at 07:54, Panu Matilainen > wrote: On 10/10/22 10:15, Jaroslav Mracek wrote: > Please can you be more specific which kind of functionality is required for particular command? Why is it impor

Re: DNF5 Blockers

On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 at 07:54, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 10/10/22 10:15, Jaroslav Mracek wrote: > > Please can you be more specific which kind of functionality is required > for particular command? Why is it important to know what user case you want > to resolve it? Commands has multiple options

Re: DNF5 Blockers

On 10/10/22 10:15, Jaroslav Mracek wrote: Please can you be more specific which kind of functionality is required for particular command? Why is it important to know what user case you want to resolve it? Commands has multiple options and some of them could be unused. Specially repoquery has t

Re: ** s390x builders Outage **

and we should be running again at almost full capacity On 10/10/22, Tomas Hrcka wrote: > There is an ongoing BOS power outage impacting s390x builders. > > Reason for outage: Power outage in the DC > > > -- > Tomas Hrcka > role: CPE Team - Senior Software Engineer > fas: humaton > freenode: jedn

Re: stuck s390x builds in koji

On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 11:15:35 +0200 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Hi! > It seems that s390x builds in koji are not progressing. At the time of > writing, I can see ~150 s390x buildArch tasks in "free" state. I've > opened https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11079 to track this issue. and we

Re: DNF5 Blockers

On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 11:48:14AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 9:15 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote: > > > > Please can you be more specific which kind of functionality is required for > > particular command? Why is it important to know what user case you want to > > resolve

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20221010.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221009.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221010.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 46 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size o

Fedora 37 compose report: 20221010.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-37-20221009.n.0 NEW: Fedora-37-20221010.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 6 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: DNF5 Blockers

On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 9:15 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote: > > Please can you be more specific which kind of functionality is required for > particular command? Why is it important to know what user case you want to > resolve it? Commands has multiple options and some of them could be unused. > Spe

Re: [INPUT REQUESTED] Re: F38 proposal: Node.js Repackaging (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 9:04 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 10:58:58PM +0200, Dan Čermák wrote: > > > There's another potential upgrade issue: We have multiple choices of > > > how to upgrade from the nodejs package to the nodejsXX packages: > > > 1) Upgrading from

Re: stuck s390x builds in koji

On Tuesday, 11 October 2022 at 11:27, Dan Horák wrote: > On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 11:18:12 +0200 > Luna Jernberg wrote: > > On 10/11/22, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > > Hi! > > > It seems that s390x builds in koji are not progressing. At the time of > > > writing, I can see ~150 s390x buil

Re: stuck s390x builds in koji

On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 11:27:52 +0200 Dominik Mierzejewski wrote: > On Tuesday, 11 October 2022 at 11:18, Luna Jernberg wrote: > > On 10/11/22, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > > Hi! > > > It seems that s390x builds in koji are not progressing. At the time of > > > writing, I can see ~150

Re: stuck s390x builds in koji

On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 11:18:12 +0200 Luna Jernberg wrote: > This might be related: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/CLWFDN22YDF65R33BB3ZRSZHBZOE2LCK/ right, the builders are not running yet Dan > On 10/11/22, Dominik

Re: stuck s390x builds in koji

On Tuesday, 11 October 2022 at 11:18, Luna Jernberg wrote: > On 10/11/22, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Hi! > > It seems that s390x builds in koji are not progressing. At the time of > > writing, I can see ~150 s390x buildArch tasks in "free" state. I've > > opened https://pagure.io/re

Re: stuck s390x builds in koji

This might be related: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/CLWFDN22YDF65R33BB3ZRSZHBZOE2LCK/ On 10/11/22, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Hi! > It seems that s390x builds in koji are not progressing. At the time of > writing, I can s

stuck s390x builds in koji

Hi! It seems that s390x builds in koji are not progressing. At the time of writing, I can see ~150 s390x buildArch tasks in "free" state. I've opened https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11079 to track this issue. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org T

[Test-Announce] Fedora-IoT 37 RC 20221011.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora-IoT 37 RC 20221011.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_pl

Orphaned rubygem-arel

Arel used to be independent package, but has been bundled into ActiveRecord and it is not maintained independently anymore, therefore I am orphaning rubygem-arel. Vít OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list

Orphaning rubygem-{Platform,POpen4}

Hi, I have orphaned rubygem-Platform and rubygem-POpen4, because I don't use them and nothing should depend on these. Vít OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscr

Re: [side tags] Undesired automatic side-tag removal happened - how to deal with it in the future?

> Oh, also I forgot to mention... > > If your sidetag is deleted, you can just request a new one, tag the old > builds back into it and be back in business. I realize that that could > be anoying if you told people a specific one and then had to make a new > one, but it's not like those builds ar

Re: rpm pulls in a dependency on perl in a noarch subpackage

V Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 04:31:31PM +, Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a): > Il 10/10/22 15:46, Petr Pisar ha scritto: > > I'm now facing a build failure on EPEL, which I can't figure out: > >> /usr/bin/ld: lilxml.o (symbol from plugin): undefined reference to > >> symbol 'xmlMalloc@@LIBXML2_2.4.30