On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 8:26 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
> Send us the sidetag as Blender and openshadinglanguage need update.
>
You can use f38-build-side-59007 I've already built OIIO and wait-repo is
done. I'll probably finish the builds tomorrow since it's getting late here.
Thanks,
Richard
Send us the sidetag as Blender and openshadinglanguage need update.
Thanks.
On 2022-10-06 18:14, Richard Shaw wrote:
All builds will be done in a side tag. I don't expect any issues.
I'd like to update f37 as well unless there are any objections.
Thanks,
Richard
_
I'm still getting this on occasion and have no idea what the issue is:
$ fedpkg new-sources OpenImageIO-2.4.4.2.tar.gz
Uploading: OpenImageIO-2.4.4.2.tar.gz
#
52.0%Could not execute new_sources: (56, 'OpenSSL SSL_read:
error:0A0003FC:SSL routines::sslv3 alert b
All builds will be done in a side tag. I don't expect any issues.
I'd like to update f37 as well unless there are any objections.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.f
The Go/No-Go for the early target date is Thursday. In order to be
ready, we need blockers to be resolved by Tuesday at the latest.
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. abrt — Abrt does not report a segfault which is reported in
journalctl. — ASSIGNED
ACTION
The Fedora Linux 37 Final Go/No-Go[1] meeting is scheduled for
Thursday 13 October at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting. At this time, we
will determine the status of the F37 Final for the 18 October early
target date[2]. For more information about the Go/No-Go meeting, see
the wiki[3].
Currently, we ha
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecatePythonToml
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Comm
On 06. 10. 22 15:04, Kalev Lember wrote:
I guess a transition plan (if we make up our minds that it makes sense to do
it) could be to first make sure the provides are autogenerated, then do a mass
rebuild, let people try it out in their packages for 6 months, and then
provenpackager-edit all of
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> We need PCRs to cover at minimum
>
> 1. Machine firmware
> 2. Bootloader(s)
> 3. Bootloader configuration
> 4. Booted kernel
> 5. Booted initrd
> 6. Booted cmdline
> Item 5 and 6 are a problem, because as mentioned thse are not signed
> by the OS vendor w
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 10:45:40AM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>
> > The way grub has to write its entire grub.conf into the TPM PCRs is
> > totally impractical for anyone wishing to maintain attestation
> > policies to verify the OS boot state from the TPM eventlog.
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> The way grub has to write its entire grub.conf into the TPM PCRs is
> totally impractical for anyone wishing to maintain attestation
> policies to verify the OS boot state from the TPM eventlog.
So this has been mentioned in several places, but no one in grub
develop
Hi, yes the freeze started on the scheduled date and time.
Please create releng ticket with packages that require blocking in koji.
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 3:25 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I retired some packages from f37 and rawhide on Tuesday and Wednesday,
> but their retirements w
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 5:11 AM Maxwell G via devel
wrote:
>
> Some of mine:
>
> - `dnf repoquery` -- Currently, `dnf5 repoquery` nowhere near meets the
> capabilities of the old version. This is the most important to me.
I agree, repoquery is an absolutely essential tool for me.
Without it, it
On Thu, 2022-10-06 at 13:53 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 09:20:47PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> > Hi Fedorians,
> >
> > I think we should define a more through list of blockers/criteria
> > that
> > dnf5 needs to meet before it can replace the current dnf.
>
Hi all,
I retired some packages from f37 and rawhide on Tuesday and Wednesday,
but their retirements were no longer processed correctly. After
looking at the F37 schedule, the Final Freeze for Fedora 37 should
have started two days ago (14:00 UTC on 2022-10-04), which might
explain this (at least
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 2:51 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 06. 10. 22 v 14:38 Kalev Lember napsal(a):
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 11:05 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>> BTW re-reading the ticket and since there are talks about DNF5, maybe it
>> would be worth of reopening the discussion. I think we coul
On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 09:20:47PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> Hi Fedorians,
>
> I think we should define a more through list of blockers/criteria that
> dnf5 needs to meet before it can replace the current dnf.
>
> The DNF maintainers have their list of requirements, but it would be
> he
Dne 06. 10. 22 v 14:38 Kalev Lember napsal(a):
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 11:05 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
BTW re-reading the ticket and since there are talks about DNF5,
maybe it
would be worth of reopening the discussion. I think we could
generally
do better and I see two options:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 11:05 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> BTW re-reading the ticket and since there are talks about DNF5, maybe it
> would be worth of reopening the discussion. I think we could generally
> do better and I see two options:
>
> 1) There seems to be a way to download additional data if n
Dne 06. 10. 22 v 14:18 Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
On 10/6/22 11:55, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 06. 10. 22 v 9:18 Otto Liljalaakso napsal(a):
Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 6.10.2022 klo 2.33:
On 06. 10. 22 1:21, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
Recently, I have run into some cases where file dependencies like
R
OLD: Fedora-37-20221005.n.0
NEW: Fedora-37-20221006.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On 10/6/22 11:55, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 06. 10. 22 v 9:18 Otto Liljalaakso napsal(a):
Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 6.10.2022 klo 2.33:
On 06. 10. 22 1:21, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
Recently, I have run into some cases where file dependencies like
Requires: /usr/bin/foo are used.
In a recent thread
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2022-10-07 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10133/
___
devel maili
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221005.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221006.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:6
Upgraded packages: 194
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.11 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 10:13:58AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/5/22 23:07, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022, at 3:01 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>
> >> 3. "Boot menu" in GUI? Given that one can reach the GUI, why it should
> >> not be possible to choose the boot
On 06-10-2022 10:13, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 10/5/22 23:07, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022, at 3:01 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
3. "Boot menu" in GUI? Given that one can reach the GUI, why it should
not be possible to choose the boot entry for next boot? Or even choose
to open FW se
Dne 06. 10. 22 v 10:55 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 06. 10. 22 v 9:18 Otto Liljalaakso napsal(a):
Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 6.10.2022 klo 2.33:
On 06. 10. 22 1:21, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
Recently, I have run into some cases where file dependencies like
Requires: /usr/bin/foo are used.
In a rec
Dne 06. 10. 22 v 9:18 Otto Liljalaakso napsal(a):
Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 6.10.2022 klo 2.33:
On 06. 10. 22 1:21, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
Recently, I have run into some cases where file dependencies like
Requires: /usr/bin/foo are used.
In a recent thread on this mailing list [1],
it is menti
Hi,
On 10/5/22 23:07, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2022, at 3:01 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>> 3. "Boot menu" in GUI? Given that one can reach the GUI, why it should
>> not be possible to choose the boot entry for next boot? Or even choose
>> to open FW setup.
>
> This could solve
Hi,
On 10/5/22 20:56, Christopher Klooz wrote:
>
> On 05/10/2022 20:28, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10/5/22 19:59, Christopher Klooz wrote:
>>> On 05/10/2022 18:39, Christopher Klooz wrote:
On 05/10/2022 17:33, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2022, at 11:16 AM, Christopher
Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 6.10.2022 klo 2.33:
On 06. 10. 22 1:21, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
Recently, I have run into some cases where file dependencies like
Requires: /usr/bin/foo are used.
In a recent thread on this mailing list [1],
it is mentioned that such Requires should be avoided,
because r
31 matches
Mail list logo
