On Mon, Sep 19, 2022, at 2:45 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> I'm fine with the proposed change. I'm also fine with the original
> text.
>
> During boot, certain actions are taken that are recorded in the TPM.
> These include, for instance, any loaders that are run - like grub2. The
> result is th
Once upon a time, Robbie Harwood said:
> So: if you install Windows and set up Bitlocker booting through grub, it
> will continue to work through grub. If you install Windows outside grub
> (or it's pre-provisioned), it will continue to work outside grub. If
> you want to move from not using gru
On 9/19/22 16:45, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Adam Williamson writes:
>
>> For background here, see:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049849
>>
>> right now, when installing Fedora alongside a Windows install with
>> BitLocker enabled, trying to boot Windows from the Fedora boot menu
>
On Mon, 2022-09-19 at 16:45 -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Adam Williamson writes:
>
> > For background here, see:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049849
> >
> > right now, when installing Fedora alongside a Windows install with
> > BitLocker enabled, trying to boot Windows from
Adam Williamson writes:
> For background here, see:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049849
>
> right now, when installing Fedora alongside a Windows install with
> BitLocker enabled, trying to boot Windows from the Fedora boot menu
> does not work.
>
> We waived the bug as a blocke
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php82
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
== Sum
For background here, see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049849
right now, when installing Fedora alongside a Windows install with
BitLocker enabled, trying to boot Windows from the Fedora boot menu
does not work.
We waived the bug as a blocker for Fedora 36 on the basis upstream di
On Mon, 2022-09-19 at 12:53 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 12:50 PM Brian C. Lane wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 11:08:35AM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 10:46 AM Marius Schwarz
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > if Fed
Also encountered the same error for 0ad
---
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64
- package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64 requires
libboost_filesystem.so.1.76.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
insta
This seems to have gone to the devel-owner instead of the list:
- Forwarded message from Jiri Olsa -
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 22:55:39 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa
To: devel-ow...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: olsaj...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: unannounced soname bump in libbpf
On Sun, Sep 04, 2022
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 12:50 PM Brian C. Lane wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 11:08:35AM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 10:46 AM Marius Schwarz
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > if Fedora 35 Liveimage is used to install Fedora, livesys and
> > > livesys-late in
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 11:08:35AM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 10:46 AM Marius Schwarz
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > if Fedora 35 Liveimage is used to install Fedora, livesys and
> > livesys-late initscripts are incorrectly copied onto the system
> > or not deleted after
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 05:58:36PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 16. 09. 22 v 19:03 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:03:35AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > Isn't peer review much better and easier solution over all? We could also
> > > require signed commits I guess.
> >
The only sad thing about this is that "FINISHED" compose very likely
does not create "releng/failed-composes" ticket, so it is harder to
notice. Therefore thx for the heads up and congratulations to everybody
involved.
Vít
Dne 17. 09. 22 v 19:07 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022
Dne 16. 09. 22 v 19:03 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:03:35AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Isn't peer review much better and easier solution over all? We could also
require signed commits I guess.
I think it would slow things down quite a lot to require peer review of
every com
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 6:06 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> if we can have chromium-src-devel ...
Thanks.
Couldn't find a prior bz so I filed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2128011
>
> > > > But, one thing that could be done to simplify things would be to
> > > > ship
> > > > a chromiu
For anybody who went and left feedback on the web sales site asking for
Linux after my last email - a big thank you. I can't help but think it
must have been a factor in the below.
Linux systems (multiple!) are now available in Europe, including of
course Fedora:
I think the below is the full lis
On Mon, Sep 19 2022 at 04:29:22 PM +0200, Kalev Lember
wrote:
I would guess it happened because the F36 webkitgtk version number
was ahead of the F37 webkitgtk version, so the versioned obsoletes
that the F37 webkitgtk packages have didn't match.
Oh, OK then. Good catch!
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 3:52 PM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19 2022 at 12:08:10 AM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin
> wrote:
> > Error: Transaction test error:
> > file /usr/bin/WebKitWebDriver from install of
> > webkit2gtk4.1-2.37.91-1.fc37.x86_64
> > conflicts with file from package w
I see a similar report here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127841
which reveals a packaging bug. But that one is slightly different
because there is an additional conflict with webkit2gtk5.0 as well,
which is a bug (only one of the F37 packages should provide the file
/usr/bin
On Mon, Sep 19 2022 at 12:08:10 AM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin
wrote:
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/bin/WebKitWebDriver from install of
webkit2gtk4.1-2.37.91-1.fc37.x86_64
conflicts with file from package webkit2gtk3-2.38.0-2.fc36.x86_64
This problem would go away if webkit2gtk3
OLD: Fedora-37-20220918.n.0
NEW: Fedora-37-20220919.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 188
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.54 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On 9/19/22 04:52, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 01:56:03PM -0400, Todd Zullinger napsal(a):
>> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:03:35AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Isn't peer review much better and easier solution over all? We could also
require signed commits
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220918.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220919.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 63
Downgraded packages: 2
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
Hi Hua,
> I need to install Fedora IoT to our chip but I realize that the
> Fedora-IoT-ostree-aarch64-36-20220618.0.iso does not support our GPU driver
> so we can't install it.
>
> + Document about our chip:
> https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2a
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2022-09-20 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be d
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 10:46 AM Marius Schwarz
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> if Fedora 35 Liveimage is used to install Fedora, livesys and
> livesys-late initscripts are incorrectly copied onto the system
> or not deleted after they lost their functionality.
>
That's not a bug, that's expected. They shoul
在 2022-09-19星期一的 10:44 +0200，Marius Schwarz写道：
>
> Hi,
>
> if Fedora 35 Liveimage is used to install Fedora, livesys and
> livesys-late initscripts are incorrectly copied onto the system
> or not deleted after they lost their functionality.
I believe that everything in Live image is copied to i
V Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 01:56:03PM -0400, Todd Zullinger napsal(a):
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:03:35AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> Isn't peer review much better and easier solution over all? We could also
> >> require signed commits I guess.
> >
> > I think it would slow
V Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 05:30:13PM +, Tommy Nguyen napsal(a):
> With that being said, if a GPG key would be compromised, wouldn't it
> result in an error when trying to update the package? An end user would
> then report the bug, someone would see that the key does not match the
> signature in t
Hi,
if Fedora 35 Liveimage is used to install Fedora, livesys and
livesys-late initscripts are incorrectly copied onto the system
or not deleted after they lost their functionality.
This happens afterwards...
[Jul 5 17:01] systemd-sysv-generator[72798]: SysV service
'/etc/rc.d/init.d/livesy
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 13:42:42 +
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 03:35:29PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> >
> > > So… we certainly don't want people having to declare the dependency
> > > manually everywhere.
> >
> > The packagi
On Mon, 19 Sep 2022 05:31:38 -
"Hua Duy" wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I need to install Fedora IoT to our chip but I realize that the
> Fedora-IoT-ostree-aarch64-36-20220618.0.iso does not support our GPU driver
> so we can't install it.
>
> + Document about our chip:
> https://www.google.com
33 matches
Mail list logo
