OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220816.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220817.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 18
Dropped packages:28
Upgraded packages: 214
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.44 GiB
Size of dropped packages
OLD: Fedora-37-20220816.n.0
NEW: Fedora-37-20220817.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:28
Upgraded packages: 116
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 31.96 MiB
Size of dropped packages:20.80 MiB
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 10:02 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel
wrote:
>
> I'm building libgda5, based on libgda as of today, and updating libdga to
> 6.0.0.
>
> The following packages are impacted.
>
> If they do not rebuild with 6.0.0, I'll update their BuildRequires with
> libgda5-devel.
>
> anjuta
> e
Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> Unfortunately, this state of affairs has ended. Libusb, one of
> novacom's dependencies has been retired, and it's not clear to me that
> it's worthwhile (or even possible) to keep novacom alive.
Does this not build against libusb-compat-0.1-devel? (That has been the
rep
Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> I don't know of an Operating System which isn't a rolling operating system
> which works this way. MacOS, Windows, Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora all require a
> manual clickthru to get to the 'next' version which is available.
For Windows, it really depends on what you mean by th
On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 22:28 -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > So, unless I hear from someone who wants it within the next week and
> > has a plan on how to fix the current FTBFS bug[2], on August 23, I will
> > retire novacom-client[3] and no
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 03:12:55AM -0700, Jan Staněk wrote:
> Hi list,
> in order to be able to compile WASM natively on Fedora,
> I'm trying to package wasi-libc[1] to provide the Web Assembly System
> Interface.
>
> [1]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/wasi-libc
>
> My trouble is that this is in
Hi Richard,
The Fedora 39 System Wide changes are scheduled for Jun 2023, so that would
be the deadline for this.
However, after feedback, I've decided to create a pcre deprecation change
at first so it's broken into more pieces and it's better documented.
When it's ready, I'll paste the link for
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 02:25:06PM +0200, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> The Fedora change for this topic is created [1].
>
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PcreRetirement
It would be helpful to have an actual deadline written in there.
"Fedora 39" requires an indirection. Are we talking 2023? 202
The Fedora change for this topic is created [1].
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PcreRetirement
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 11:46 AM Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've decided to write a Fedora change that will contain all of the
> information about this possible retirement.
>
> I have to fill
On Wed, 2022-08-17 at 10:21 +0200, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FYI: AARCH64 rawhide produces this output every now and than ...
>
> Aug 17 10:18:16 fedorapine gnome-software[1203]: failed to refresh the
> cache: PKI file
> /var/cache/PackageKit/38/metadata/rawhide-modular-rawhide-aarch64.t
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 10:52 PM Fedora Rawhide Report
wrote:
>
(snip)
> = UPGRADED PACKAGES =
> Package: kernel-6.0.0-0.rc1.13.fc38
> Old package: kernel-5.20.0-0.rc0.20220812git7ebfc85e2cd7.10.fc38
> Summary: The Linux kernel
> RPMs: kernel kernel-core kernel-debug
We could use something like this instead:```%{__sed} --in-place=.backup --regexp-extended --_expression_='/^lt_cv_sys_global_symbol_to_cdecl=/{:start;s/""//;s/^(.*)\\$/\1/;T end;N;s/\n//;t start;:end}' configurediff -u configure.backup configure && mv configure.backup configure``` It is a bit more
Hi,
FYI: AARCH64 rawhide produces this output every now and than ...
Aug 17 10:18:16 fedorapine gnome-software[1203]: failed to refresh the
cache: PKI file
/var/cache/PackageKit/38/metadata/rawhide-modular-rawhide-aarch64.tmp/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-39-aarch64
is not a public key
Aug 17 10:18:16
Hi,
That's the way it is:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ksh/blob/rawhide/f/ksh.spec#_4 or am I
wrong?
vincent
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 5:57 AM Jilayne Lovejoy
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Did you or could you also update the License: field to "EPL-2.0" as per
> the change to using SPDX identifiers. :)
FYI: we cancelled the meeting for today.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:30 PM wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Fedora Source-git SIG on 2022-08-17 from 14:30:00 to 15:30:00 GMT
>At meet.google.com/mic-otnv-kse
>
> The meeting will be about:
> Meeting of the Fedo
16 matches
Mail list logo
