On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Martin Gansser wrote:
Sorry i ment F36/F37.
You didn't answer whether you see the same problem on F38. Have you tried
it there?
Never mind - I tried it there and do observe the same
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Martin Gansser wrote:
Sorry i ment F36/F37.
You didn't answer whether you see the same problem on F38. Have you tried it
there?
Never mind - I tried it there and do observe the same problem.
Scott
___
On Sat, 13 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/12/22 11:35 AM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/12/22 11:00 AM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
It turns out that there is a bug in wxPython whereby it installs an
error handler that should not be installed by a li
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Martin Gansser wrote:
Sorry i ment F36/F37.
You didn't answer whether you see the same problem on F38. Have you tried
it there?
Scott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dev
On 8/15/22 04:37, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 15. 08. 22 v 1:19 Demi Marie Obenour napsal(a):
>> On 8/11/22 10:23, Ben Beasley wrote:
>>> I don’t enjoy this topic at all, but I feel obligated to contribute some
>>> relevant links.
>>>
>>> A previous discussion on the packaging mailing list[1] conc
Hello,
beginning with scummvm version 2.6.0, the license for the packages scummvm
and scummvm-tools have been changed as follows:
scummvm: "GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+ and BSD and OFL and MIT and ISC"
scummvm-tools: "GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+ and MIT"
Best regards,
Christian
___
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MinizipRenaming
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committe
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 03:47:28PM +0200, Petr Salaba wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> My name is Petr and I'm a new intern at RedHat, hoping to start
> maintaining packages in Fedora, currently starting with some perl packages.
> Other than that I've made a few open source contributions here and the
The Bug Blocker Review meeting got cancelled today as Ben has other things
to take care of
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 2:23 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Hi folks! Sorry for the late notice, but I'm proposing we cancel the
> QA meeting today. I am going to be on a plane to devconf.us, so I
> won't be
Sorry i ment F36/F37.
Regards
Martin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List G
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 at 09:38, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 15. 08. 22 v 13:58 Stephen Smoogen napsal(a):
>
>
>
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 at 04:21, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>> I just wonder, is the system upgrade to the more recent Fedora
>> automatic? I suspect that the answer is *no*, otherwise I would n
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Martin Gansser wrote:
Hi,
since i started guayadeque to compile with wxsqlite3-4.8.2-5.fc36.x86_64 and
wxGTK-3.1.5-6.fc36.x86_64 compile, the program starts on F37/F38 with the
following error message:
../src/generic/imaglist.cpp(44): assert "m_size != wxSize(0, 0)" faile
On Mon, Aug 15 2022 at 03:37:45 PM +0200, Vít Ondruch
wrote:
Yes, that is fine. But at the same time, there is no warning like
"Your system won't be provided with updates anymore, because it is
EOL" followed up with "While there is new version available, your
system is too old to be upgraded,
On 8/15/22 09:37, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 15. 08. 22 v 13:58 Stephen Smoogen napsal(a):
I think for Fedora 34 and beyond, the user will now get a big banner
on Workstation saying 'A new version of the operating system is ready
for you' which will require them to click that they want to upgrade
Hello everybody,
My name is Petr and I'm a new intern at RedHat, hoping to start
maintaining packages in Fedora, currently starting with some perl packages.
Other than that I've made a few open source contributions here and there,
and I'm hoping I can learn some new things along the way.
Here is
Dne 15. 08. 22 v 13:58 Stephen Smoogen napsal(a):
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 at 04:21, Vít Ondruch wrote:
I just wonder, is the system upgrade to the more recent Fedora
automatic? I suspect that the answer is *no*, otherwise I would
not need
yesterday to update the system from F33 (
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220813.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220815.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 69
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 359.63 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Hi folks! Sorry for the late notice, but I'm proposing we cancel the
QA meeting today. I am going to be on a plane to devconf.us, so I
won't be able to run it.
Thanks folks!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net
Hi,
Am 15.08.22 um 13:58 schrieb Stephen Smoogen:
I don't know of an Operating System which isn't a rolling operating
system which works this way. MacOS, Windows, Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora
all require a manual clickthru to get to the 'next' version which is
available. This is because these upda
Hi,
since i started guayadeque to compile with wxsqlite3-4.8.2-5.fc36.x86_64 and
wxGTK-3.1.5-6.fc36.x86_64 compile, the program starts on F37/F38 with the
following error message:
../src/generic/imaglist.cpp(44): assert "m_size != wxSize(0, 0)" failed in
GetImageCount(): Invalid image list
Down
OLD: Fedora-37-20220814.n.0
NEW: Fedora-37-20220815.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:5
Upgraded packages: 38
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:1.14 MiB
Size of
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 at 04:21, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I just wonder, is the system upgrade to the more recent Fedora
> automatic? I suspect that the answer is *no*, otherwise I would not need
> yesterday to update the system from F33 (I am rawhide user, so pardon my
> ignorance).
>
> Therefore my qu
On 15. 08. 22 12:36, Lubomír Sedlář wrote:
Miro Hrončok píše v Po 15. 08. 2022 v 12:04 +0200:
Hello,
for a few days now, the Fedora 37 Python Classroom Lab fails to build
with
dependency issues like this:
Wild guess: could it be excluded by the -java* pattern in the kickstart
file?
https://
Thanks for responding. So, this appeared to have worked now:
dnf update fedora-gpg-keys
dnf update fedora-repos --release 37
(--release 38 made no difference for now). And now this works, because
gpg-pubkey-eb10b464-6202d9c6 is now installed:
$ dnf download --assumeyes --releasever=rawhide zip
Miro Hrončok píše v Po 15. 08. 2022 v 12:04 +0200:
> Hello,
>
> for a few days now, the Fedora 37 Python Classroom Lab fails to build
> with
> dependency issues like this:
>
>
Wild guess: could it be excluded by the -java* pattern in the kickstart
file?
https://pagure.io/fedora-kickstarts/blob
Hello,
for a few days now, the Fedora 37 Python Classroom Lab fails to build with
dependency issues like this:
Problem 1: conflicting requests
- package emacs-1:28.1-3.fc37.x86_64 requires
libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0.so.18()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package javas
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 15th
August(today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on Matrix or IRC (Libera.chat).
The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You
can join us over:
Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#neuro:fedoraproje
> Major version updates often change behaviour of the apps or the system itself
It's also worth mentioning that if some packages are retired, they will not be
available in the new Fedora version. In the old days, this would mean you
might get some old & broken packages stuck on your system; nowaday
Hi,
I've decided to write a Fedora change that will contain all of the
information about this possible retirement.
I have to fill the dependencies that will be affected by this change, so
I'm looking for the tool/command which will give them to me.
I've seen multiple suggestions here in this thre
On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 10:20 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I don't think that Fedora should allow to keep the system outdated
> and without updates.
Hi,
Fedora is not a rolling distro. Najor version updates often change
behaviour of the apps or the system itself, not talking that there are
gi
Dne 15. 08. 22 v 1:19 Demi Marie Obenour napsal(a):
On 8/11/22 10:23, Ben Beasley wrote:
I don’t enjoy this topic at all, but I feel obligated to contribute some
relevant links.
A previous discussion on the packaging mailing list[1] concluded that it
doesn’t seem possible to package HTML doc
I just wonder, is the system upgrade to the more recent Fedora
automatic? I suspect that the answer is *no*, otherwise I would not need
yesterday to update the system from F33 (I am rawhide user, so pardon my
ignorance).
Therefore my question is, can it be automatic? Is it configurable?
Just
32 matches
Mail list logo
