OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220719.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220721.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 320
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 9.79 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 9:50 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> The current minimum at zEC12 is
> targeting hardware that has been already obsoleted by the vendor.
As I understand it, while zEC12 is EOL (you can no longer
purchase it), it is not (yet) EOS, so existing systems can
still obtain service from I
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 37 Rawhide 20220721.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Richard Shaw wrote on 2022/07/21 10:52:
Looking at brasero I can build "fine" doing a fedpkg mockbuild but adding
"--enablerepo=local" replicates the failure seen in koji[1].
I tried comparing the root logs between the two to see what's different but
I don't find the results particularly helpful
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> I'd argue that this should've been submitted as a System-Wide Change.
> If I understand correctly, this change would affect every package that
> is built on s390x?
> As such, it would've been way too late for Fedora 37, as it should
> also have been ready before the mass re
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 4:56 PM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 16:48:02 +0200
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > On 15. 07. 22 23:48, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > == Summary ==
> > > Move the minimal architecture level for IBM Z hardware (the s390x
> > > architecture) to z13 to benefit from the new
* Bob Mauchin:
> Seems to be related to this post on the ML:
>
> Long-running side tag for porting Fedora to C99 (no implicit decls)
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LRPFW3IJTM7BWKL6RDSB3VYGAVDDUFR3/
This can't be it, it was never establish
Hello, Piotr!
Welcome to Fedora! It's good to see another compatriot join the
community. :)
On Thursday, 21 July 2022 at 16:38, Piotr Szubiakowski wrote:
> Hello Fedora Developers,
>
> I want to introduce myself. I'm from Poland and currently live in
> Munich. I have been a Fedora user since the
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-07-20/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-07-20-16.30.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-07-20/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-07-20-16.30.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022
Hello Fedora Developers,
I want to introduce myself. I'm from Poland and currently live in
Munich. I have been a Fedora user since the first Fedora Core release.
I work for European Southern Observatory [1]. My team prepares the
development environment for Extremely Large Telescope [2] Control
So
Because its sources contain a single header file licensed LGPLv3+, the
License field of givaro has been corrected[1] from “CeCILL-B” to
“CeCILL-B and LGPLv3+”.
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/givaro/pull-request/3
___
devel mailing list -- deve
On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 at 16:12, Dan Čermák
wrote:
> Hi Kevin and all,
>
> "Kevin P. Fleming" writes:
>
> > On 7/20/22 14:57, Marcus Müller wrote:
> >> Oh! That comes as a surprise. Let me try a rebuild!
> >>
> >> :( I was really looking forward to emacs-pgtk.
> >>
> > Forgive my relative newbie-ne
Hi all,
I just went ahead and retired gnome-books in rawhide as it's
retired/archived upstream and FTBFS downstream. If anyone wants to
resurrect it, please pick up upstream maintenance first.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Archive/gnome-books
Thanks!
--
Kalev
___
The docs make it seem like maintaining a spin isn't that much work,
and the kickstart files for spins look rather straightforward.
> ## Maintainer did not respond to pings
> * Games Spin — https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Games_Spin
Unless someone more experienced comes along, I'd be willing
to take
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220720.0):
ID: 1332392 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 11:30:07AM +0200, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for not dealing with this earlier. I was somewhat out for a
> while, and didn't give the mail much significance.
>
> What happened is that I'll be leaving Red Hat. As a first step, I
> changed my FAS email address whil
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022, at 12:24 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fr, 15.07.22 10:03, Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) wrote:
>
>> We recently did
>> https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/pull/1840 for Fedora
>> CoreOS (more background:
>> https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracke
Hi,
sorry for not dealing with this earlier. I was somewhat out for a
while, and didn't give the mail much significance.
What happened is that I'll be leaving Red Hat. As a first step, I
changed my FAS email address while explicitly keeping my Red Hat
address for bugzilla for now.
I thought that
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220718.0):
ID: 1332376 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 04:46:38PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 06. 07. 22 v 20:13 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Preset_All_Systemd_Units_on_First_Boot
> >
> > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> > process, proposals are pub
On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 02:26:33PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 2:14 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Preset_All_Systemd_Units_on_First_Boot
> >
> > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> > process, proposals are
21 matches
Mail list logo
