On 7/20/22 13:48, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> (Sorry for the messed up line wrapping. I wanted to get this out.)
>
> Hi Jerry,
>
> On 22/07/06 08:13PM, Jerry James wrote:
>> - golang-github-google-cel (eclipseo, @go-sig): needs the Go runtime
>> from the antlr4-project package
>> - golang-google
On 7/20/22 15:56, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20 2022 at 04:29:40 PM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel
> wrote:
>> That is not a reasonable solution. Those applications need embedded
>> HTML in
>> the UI, not a separate browser window. And it does not help at all if
>> the
>> browser tha
On 7/20/22 16:20, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mi, 20.07.22 21:55, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
> (marma...@invisiblethingslab.com) wrote:
>
>>> I wonder if Qubes OS could use any of this work. It seems that it
>>> would be incredibly useful, at least if it supported systems using
>>> the Xen hy
On 7/20/22 15:55, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 03:06:46PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> On 7/19/22 12:13, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> On Di, 19.07.22 16:15, Gerd Hoffmann (kra...@redhat.com) wrote:
>>>
> Moreover, this allows us to implemented TPM policies
On Wed, 2022-07-20 at 22:51 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 5:43 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> > Next time can you please consider gnome-kiosk mandatory to be fixed
> > before sending the bump to Rawhide? It is on the compose critical path:
> >
>
> Ah, oops, I had no idea
If Fab doesn't have time I'll pick up the Security Spin. But if memory
serves, we ran into him not responding before because he was on vacation.
So that may be the case again. However until we know for sure, I'll raise
my hand that if he doesnt want to keep it up, cant keep it up, or doesn't
resp
In accordance with FESCo's approved[1] keepalive policy, the following
Spins/Labs will be dropped from F37 unless new maintainers step up.
## Maintainer indicated they do not have time to maintain for this release
* Robotics Spin — https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Robotics_Spin
## Maintainer did no
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 5:43 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Next time can you please consider gnome-kiosk mandatory to be fixed
> before sending the bump to Rawhide? It is on the compose critical path:
>
Ah, oops, I had no idea. Will do so next time!
--
Kalev
_
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 3:37 PM Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>
> This week my F36 system got upgraded to Emacs version 28, so it's
> already in F36. How is that possible?
It's possible because we generally rely on packagers to Do The Right
Thing™. There aren't technical restrictions like in some of ou
On 7/19/22 21:59, Jerry James wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 8:13 PM Jerry James wrote:
The various ANTLR packages will be impacted by
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs.
These 3 packages are the only ones that have not been dealt with.
These packages will fail the mass rebu
On Mi, 20.07.22 21:55, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
(marma...@invisiblethingslab.com) wrote:
> > I wonder if Qubes OS could use any of this work. It seems that it
> > would be incredibly useful, at least if it supported systems using
> > the Xen hypervisor.
>
> That's probably going to be useful f
Hi Kevin and all,
"Kevin P. Fleming" writes:
> On 7/20/22 14:57, Marcus Müller wrote:
>> Oh! That comes as a surprise. Let me try a rebuild!
>>
>> :( I was really looking forward to emacs-pgtk.
>>
> Forgive my relative newbie-ness here, but this proposal is to upgrade
> Emacs to version 28 in F
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> I presume it uses a sandboxed multiprocess architecture anyway, like
> upstream Chromium. Is it not true?
>
> If so, it's surely one of the most secure packages we have in Fedora.
> Of course, that's no good excuse to fall behind on security updates.
> But I have high con
On Wed, Jul 20 2022 at 09:00:28 PM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
(The fact that
these fixes are not included in the betas, but only dropped into the
stable
release, also makes the beta testing quite pointless and compromises
the
stability of the stable releases.)
A little feedback o
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 11:48 AM Maxwell G wrote:
> I'm replying as a member of the go-sig, as the primary maintainer is pretty
> busy lately.
>
> At least 289 source packages (recursively) BuildRequire
> golang-github-google-cel-devel[1]. Some of these packages only provide
> `-devel` subpackages
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 at 09:32, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >>> With these new macros, the examples from above could be re-written as:
> >>>
> >>> compiler-rt: %global _pkg_extra_cflags -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE
> >>> julia: %global _flag_glibcxx_assertions %{nil}
> >> Do you have some background
On Wed, Jul 20 2022 at 04:29:40 PM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
That is not a reasonable solution. Those applications need embedded
HTML in
the UI, not a separate browser window. And it does not help at all if
the
browser that is shelled out to itself uses QtWebEngine.
I presume it u
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 03:06:46PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 7/19/22 12:13, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Di, 19.07.22 16:15, Gerd Hoffmann (kra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >
> >>> Moreover, this allows us to implemented TPM policies that bind to
> >>> signatures of PCR hashes, instead
He Kevin,
oh, true, after all,
dnf info --releasever=36 emacs
agrees with you. Now, I'm kind of confused about the point of the change
proposal?
emacs -nw -q --batch --eval '(message system-configuration-options)' 2>&1 | grep native
compilaion
also tells me that the announced native compilat
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 1:38 PM Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Forgive my relative newbie-ness here, but this proposal is to upgrade
> Emacs to version 28 in F37. That seems fine.
>
> This week my F36 system got upgraded to Emacs version 28, so it's
> already in F36. How is that possible?
For even mor
On 7/20/22 14:57, Marcus Müller wrote:
Oh! That comes as a surprise. Let me try a rebuild!
:( I was really looking forward to emacs-pgtk.
Forgive my relative newbie-ness here, but this proposal is to upgrade
Emacs to version 28 in F37. That seems fine.
This week my F36 system got upgraded to
On 7/19/22 12:13, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Di, 19.07.22 16:15, Gerd Hoffmann (kra...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>>> Moreover, this allows us to implemented TPM policies that bind to
>>> signatures of PCR hashes, instead of the literal hash values. That
>>> makes the measurements a *million* times
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 20/07/2022 16:50, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
>> There is a lag, but it is less than the average lag we add in Fedora.
>>
>> E.g., the security fixes from Chromium 100 were backported to
>> qtwebengine- chromium git after 1 month, and the release was tagged 2
Oh! That comes as a surprise. Let me try a rebuild!
:( I was really looking forward to emacs-pgtk.
Best regards,
Marcus
On 19.07.22 11:53, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 5:14 AM Marcus Müller wrote:
Since the pgtk toolkit supports both X and wayland under the hood, I'
Hi all,
Per the Fedora f37 schedule[1] we have started a mass rebuild
on 2022-07-20 for Fedora f37. We are running this mass rebuild
for the changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open&tags=mass+rebuild
This mass rebuild will be done in a side tag (f37-rebuild) and merged
when
(Sorry for the messed up line wrapping. I wanted to get this out.)
Hi Jerry,
On 22/07/06 08:13PM, Jerry James wrote:
> - golang-github-google-cel (eclipseo, @go-sig): needs the Go runtime
> from the antlr4-project package
> - golang-google-grpc (eclipseo, @go-sig): needs
> golang-github-google-ce
On 20/07/2022 16:50, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
There is a lag, but it is less than the average lag we add in Fedora.
E.g., the security fixes from Chromium 100 were backported to qtwebengine-
chromium git after 1 month, and the release was tagged 2 weeks later.
This is not about the Fedora
PS:
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> (*) These features require the KDE KF5/Plasma integration plugin, i.e.,
> the optional falkon-kde subpackage. Everything else is built-in into
> Falkon and/or Qt.
The gopher:// example also requires the kio_gopher package, which is not
installed by default for
Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> What advantage does Falkon have over upstream Chromium? Serious question.
Better desktop integration. (Especially KDE Plasma integration, but there is
also a gnome-keyring plugin available. The KF5/Plasma integration plugin
uses KWallet, of course, but also does othe
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 17:49:05 +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Hi Ankur,
Hi Kevin,
>
> If you want to go straight for 5.15.10, then the first step would be to get
> 5.15.10 into Rawhide, and then go through the same steps above to push
> 5.15.10 to the stable releases.
Thanks for that. I
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 5:38 PM Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
>
> On 7/19/22 08:04, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 4:32 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
> > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 19/07/2022 01:28, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>> I see https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022, at 4:44 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Where does that build happen? Must be outside the kernel
> rpm build process, so probably when generating the ostree?
Exactly. We also run all %post scripts server side too for example.
You can see the logs for this at e.g.
https://koj
Hi Ankur,
Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 03:58:41 +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
>> So, since all current maintainers of qt5-qtwebengine, including me, are
>> failing badly at keeping the package up to date with security fixes, this
>> is an urgent plea for help. The current situa
On Wed, 2022-07-20 at 11:36 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As part of gnome-shell 43.alpha (already in rawhide), mutter has bumped
> its soname from libmutter-10.so.0 to libmutter-11.so.0.
>
> The following packages are still built against libmutter-10.so.0 and
> need fixing/porting t
On 7/19/22 08:04, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 4:32 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> On 19/07/2022 01:28, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>> I see https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ee990d1f61
>> was
>>> pushed with just a handful of
The latest version, 4.5, changes the license from GPLv2 to GPLv3+.
The package is not a library, so this should not cause any problems.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
On 7/20/22 10:29, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> I can’t help with maintenance, but I honestly wonder if some of
>> these programs could be modified to shell out to a browser subprocess.
>
> That is not a reasonable solution. Those applications need embedded HTML in
Hi Kevin,
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 03:58:41 +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> So, since all current maintainers of qt5-qtwebengine, including me, are
> failing badly at keeping the package up to date with security fixes, this is
> an urgent plea for help. The current situation is not acceptable
On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 16:48:02 +0200
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 15. 07. 22 23:48, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > == Summary ==
> > Move the minimal architecture level for IBM Z hardware (the s390x
> > architecture) to z13 to benefit from the new features and better
> > performance in the newer CPU.
>
> I sup
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> QtWebEngine is an extremely vulnerable thing due to a major lag after
> WebKit/Blink security patches.
There is a lag, but it is less than the average lag we add in Fedora.
E.g., the security fixes from Chromium 100 were backported to qtwebengine-
chromium git af
On 15. 07. 22 23:48, Ben Cotton wrote:
== Summary ==
Move the minimal architecture level for IBM Z hardware (the s390x
architecture) to z13 to benefit from the new features and better
performance in the newer CPU.
I suppose, considering the mass rebuild is today, that this change only makes
se
> Systemd will execute the equivalent of '''systemctl preset-all''' when
> an unconfigured system is booted
> ([https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/machine-id.html#First%20Boot%20Semantics
> "First Boot"] condition). This means that units will be enabled or
> disabled according to the
Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> I can’t help with maintenance, but I honestly wonder if some of
> these programs could be modified to shell out to a browser subprocess.
That is not a reasonable solution. Those applications need embedded HTML in
the UI, not a separate browser window. And it does not h
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote on 2022/07/11 2:43:
Hello.
fmt 9.0.x update will include a soversion bump from .8 to .9. It has both API
and ABI changes.
Changelog: https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt/releases/tag/9.0.0
The list of affected packages in Rawhide:
0ad
OpenImageIO
cantera
ceph
dolphin-e
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 2:50 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 20 2022 at 12:08:36 PM +0200, Kalev Lember
> wrote:
> > Agreed, no rush here as long as things continue working. I don't know
> > what Michael's timeframe is for removing webkit2gtk-4.0, but I would
> > expect it to be at le
On Wed, Jul 20 2022 at 11:51:49 AM +0200, Fabio Valentini
wrote:
Do the gnome-terminal / gnome-console plugins for nautilus already
support gtk4?
I'd rather not have to live without those.
Both these applications are still GTK 3. There is a merge request for
Console here:
https://gitlab.gn
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 1:58 PM Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> gcr upstream has released gcr 3.90, which is the pre-release for gcr 4.x
> release. The new release is (mostly) parallel installable with the
> current version, 3.x, so we've packaged it in a parallel installable way
> in Fedora a
On Wed, Jul 20 2022 at 07:49:27 AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
My current plan is to retire webkit2gtk3/webkit2gtk4.0 at the same
time that we remove libsoup 2: February next year, right after F38 is
branched. This way, we can release F39 in November next year with
libsoup 3 only.
Forgot
On Wed, Jul 20 2022 at 12:08:36 PM +0200, Kalev Lember
wrote:
Agreed, no rush here as long as things continue working. I don't know
what Michael's timeframe is for removing webkit2gtk-4.0, but I would
expect it to be at least a year from now to give time for things to
transition over.
My cur
On Wed, Jul 20 2022 at 01:42:12 PM +0200, Kalev Lember
wrote:
Packages now using rest (libsoup 2):
gnome-initial-setup-43~alpha.1-1.fc37.src.rpm
gnome-online-accounts-3.45.1-1.fc37.src.rpm
Oops: these are libsoup 3
Packages using rest0.7 (libsoup 3):
And the rest of these are libsoup 2.
Hi all,
gcr upstream has released gcr 3.90, which is the pre-release for gcr 4.x
release. The new release is (mostly) parallel installable with the
current version, 3.x, so we've packaged it in a parallel installable way
in Fedora as well. It landed in rawhide last night as part of the GNOME
43.a
Hi all,
As part of GNOME 43.alpha, the rest package was updated to 0.9.1 (API
version 1.0), which is the libsoup 3 version. The previous ABI (API
version 0.7) is now available in the rest0.7 compat package for libsoup
2 users.
Packages now using rest (libsoup 2):
gnome-initial-setup-43~alp
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 06:52:26 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
Hi Richard,
Thanks very much for sharing your script.
> I use this script which I'm pretty sure I pieced together from some of
> Sergio's
> logic some time ago. I like that it saves them to a file so I can iterate over
> them with othe
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 12:21 PM Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> Florian or Jonas (both CCd now) should be able to answer this better than I
> can, although I am not sure they are around right now (it's GUADEC in Mexico
> this week).
Thanks! For now, I've opened tickets with the affected upstream proje
On 20/07/2022 11:57, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Just to clarify, epiphany and other GTK- and WebKit-based browsers
don't use QtWebEngine, but WebKitGTK.
Oops, my mistake. Ofc only KDE/Qt apps is using QtWebEngine for
rendering HTML.
As far as I know, it doesn't suffer from the same support / la
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 12:33 PM Milan Crha wrote:
>
> > "error: The name `soup_uri' does not exist in the context of
> > `E.SourceWebdav' (libedataserver-1.2)"
> > Is this an expected API change, and if so, do I need to poke upstream
> > to help me port it to the latest e-d-s version?
>
> Hi,
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 12:09 PM Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 12:03 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 11:02 AM Kalev Lember wrote:
>> > Here is where we stand right now.
>> >
>> > Packages linking to webkit2gtk-4.0:
>> >
>> > elementary-capnet-assist-2.4.
> "error: The name `soup_uri' does not exist in the context of
> `E.SourceWebdav' (libedataserver-1.2)"
> Is this an expected API change, and if so, do I need to poke upstream
> to help me port it to the latest e-d-s version?
Hi,
yes, it's expected, the SoupURI structure is gone in libsoup3, t
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 11:48 AM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 11:38 AM Kalev Lember
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As part of gnome-shell 43.alpha (already in rawhide), mutter has bumped
> > its soname from libmutter-10.so.0 to libmutter-11.so.0.
> >
> > The following p
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 10:30:14AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 19. 07. 22 v 9:58 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden napsal(a):
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 09:48:33AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dear Ewoud,
Dne 12. 07. 22 v 15:16 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden napsal(a):
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 01:03:59PM +
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 11:53 AM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> Do the gnome-terminal / gnome-console plugins for nautilus already support
> gtk4?
> I'd rather not have to live without those.
>
I don't know, but it should be fairly easy to port them as nautilus
extensions tend to be tiny. I can put it
On 07/20/22 11:29, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 11:23:14AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> I think we could modify libguestfs to test "setfiles" for the "-T"
>> option -- with setfiles_has_option() --, and if it's present, pass "-T
>> 0". However, for that to be actually useful
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 12:03 PM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 11:02 AM Kalev Lember
> wrote:
> > Here is where we stand right now.
> >
> > Packages linking to webkit2gtk-4.0:
> >
> > elementary-capnet-assist-2.4.2-1.fc37.src.rpm
> > elementary-mail-6.4.0-1.fc36.src.rpm
> > el
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 11:02 AM Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Latest webkitgtk build in rawhide now has two parallel installable API's:
>
> webkit2gtk-4.0, gtk3 + libsoup 2 (webkit2gtk3-devel rpm)
> webkit2gtk-4.1, gtk3 + libsoup 3 (webkit2gtk4.1-devel rpm)
>
> This is to support libsoup 2
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 11:04 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 20/07/2022 08:55, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > I also wonder if some features of QtWebEngine, such as the V8 JIT
> > compiler or even scripting as a whole, ought to be proactively
> > disabled.
>
> QtWebEngine is an extremely
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 11:17 AM Kalev Lember wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> nautilus 43.alpha that just landed in rawhide switched from gtk3 to
> gtk4. This means that all nautilus extensions also need porting from
> gtk3 to gtk4.
>
> I don't have any good ideas here how we can get there easily so an
>
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 11:38 AM Kalev Lember wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> As part of gnome-shell 43.alpha (already in rawhide), mutter has bumped
> its soname from libmutter-10.so.0 to libmutter-11.so.0.
>
> The following packages are still built against libmutter-10.so.0 and
> need fixing/porting to
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 10:42 AM Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> evolution-data-server 3.45.1 has bumped sonames of all its libraries.
> This is in part due to switching from libsoup 2 to libsoup 3 to make
> sure that all of the consumers link to only libsoup 3.
>
> This has already been pushe
Hi all,
As part of gnome-shell 43.alpha (already in rawhide), mutter has bumped
its soname from libmutter-10.so.0 to libmutter-11.so.0.
The following packages are still built against libmutter-10.so.0 and
need fixing/porting to switch over, or maybe a compat package for the
elementary deskt
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 11:23:14AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> I think we could modify libguestfs to test "setfiles" for the "-T"
> option -- with setfiles_has_option() --, and if it's present, pass "-T
> 0". However, for that to be actually useful, we'd need to start up the
> appliance with multi
On 07/19/22 21:21, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 05:42:35PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SELinux_Parallel_Autorelabel
>>
>> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
>> process, proposals are publicly announced in
Hi all,
nautilus 43.alpha that just landed in rawhide switched from gtk3 to
gtk4. This means that all nautilus extensions also need porting from
gtk3 to gtk4.
I don't have any good ideas here how we can get there easily so an
intermediate solution would be to just disable nautilus extensions in
On 20/07/2022 08:55, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
I also wonder if some features of QtWebEngine, such as the V8 JIT
compiler or even scripting as a whole, ought to be proactively
disabled.
QtWebEngine is an extremely vulnerable thing due to a major lag after
WebKit/Blink security patches. I even
Hi all,
Latest webkitgtk build in rawhide now has two parallel installable API's:
webkit2gtk-4.0, gtk3 + libsoup 2 (webkit2gtk3-devel rpm)
webkit2gtk-4.1, gtk3 + libsoup 3 (webkit2gtk4.1-devel rpm)
This is to support libsoup 2 to libsoup 3 transition where two different
libsoup ABI versions ca
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220719.0):
ID: 1331703 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 11:02:32AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022, at 10:15 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >
> > That is the big if. If you have the initrds.
> >
> > I've hacked up the kernel rpm to also build a initrd (targeting virtual
> > machines for starters) and shippin
Hi all,
evolution-data-server 3.45.1 has bumped sonames of all its libraries.
This is in part due to switching from libsoup 2 to libsoup 3 to make
sure that all of the consumers link to only libsoup 3.
This has already been pushed to rawhide as part of GNOME 43.alpha and
Milan and I did rebuilds
Dne 19. 07. 22 v 9:58 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden napsal(a):
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 09:48:33AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dear Ewoud,
Dne 12. 07. 22 v 15:16 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden napsal(a):
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 01:03:59PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
rubygem-bundler_ext jaruga, ruby-pa
78 matches
Mail list logo
