On 7/19/22 21:58, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> QtWebEngine is used as the HTML component for many Qt applications,
> including large parts of the KDE software universe. It is used by web
> browsers such as Falkon, but also, e.g., by KMail/Kontact.
>
> The version that is currently (s
* Tom Stellard:
> Or we could just leave it as is and document that the default complier
> behavior takes precedence over compiler flags. The proposed change
> doesn't actually make the problem worse, because the current method
> for removing compiler flags has the same problem: e.g.
>
> %global
On Wed, 2022-07-20 at 00:09 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> OK, I think we are close to the finish line here.
>
> Most of GNOME 43.alpha builds are done and gnome-shell and
> evolution-data-server stacks are both nicely switched over from libsoup 2
> to libsoup 3. Huge thanks to Milan Crha for all th
On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 8:13 PM Jerry James wrote:
> The various ANTLR packages will be impacted by
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs. The parser
> generators, which are written in Java, will no longer be available on
> i686. If absolutely necessary, we could continue to pac
Hi,
QtWebEngine is used as the HTML component for many Qt applications,
including large parts of the KDE software universe. It is used by web
browsers such as Falkon, but also, e.g., by KMail/Kontact.
The version that is currently (still) used the most is the Qt 5 version.
There is also a Qt 6
On Wed, Jul 20 2022 at 12:09:08 AM +0200, Kalev Lember
wrote:
Various bits have switched over to libsoup 3 which also can cause
breakage in consumers: it's not supported to link to both libsoup 2
and libsoup 3 in the same process, so care needs to be taken to only
link to one of them.
Some p
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 7:06 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
> How to find they are absolutely necessary? if-in them back if theirs
> maintainers rise hand?
>
> Because that sounds like the way to go. Seeing the depndece chain, There
> seems to be no pure show stopper.
Yes, since none of the maintainers
On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 11:31 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> Not sure why your list does not include these, but the following
> packages also build-require antlr-C++:
> * gdl - already has java bcond; BR on antlr would need to be wrapped into
> bcond
> * nco - seems to have ability to be built with
OK, I think we are close to the finish line here.
Most of GNOME 43.alpha builds are done and gnome-shell and
evolution-data-server stacks are both nicely switched over from libsoup 2
to libsoup 3. Huge thanks to Milan Crha for all the help with libsoup 3
porting and builds! It was quite an effort
On Di, 19.07.22 21:16, Fedora Development ML (devel@lists.fedoraproject.org)
wrote:
> Would pre-building the initrds mean all users have to use the same
> partition layout. If that happened, than many people dual boot
> setups will not work
No, it dos not mean that.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poetteri
Would pre-building the initrds mean all users have to use the same partition
layout. If that happened, than many people dual boot setups will not work
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lis
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 10:11:05PM +0200, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 9:21 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 05:42:35PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SELinux_Parallel_Autorelabel
> > >
> > > This document represent
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 9:21 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 05:42:35PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SELinux_Parallel_Autorelabel
> >
> > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> > process, proposals are publ
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 05:42:35PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SELinux_Parallel_Autorelabel
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This propos
On 22/07/17 09:57PM, Maxwell G wrote:
> golang 1.18.4 was released a couple days ago. This release has fixes for
> 9 medium (rated by Red Hat Product Security) CVEs, so I will preform a
> rebuild in `rawhide` and `f36` to mitigate them[^0]. See
> https://groups.google.com/g/golang-dev/c/frczlF8OFQ0
It's me again with some more schedule reminders
* 2022-07-19 (TODAY!) — F37 Self-Contained Change proposals due
* 2022-07-20 (TOMORROW) — Mass rebuild begins
* 2022-07-26 — Software string freeze
* 2022-08-09 — F37 branches from Rawhide, Change complete (testable) deadline
More schedule details a
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022, at 12:24 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> by something like this:
>
>
> ExecStart=/usr/bin/systemd-tmpfiles --create -
> StandardInputText=f /run/sysctl.d/01-coreos-printk.conf - - - - kernel.printk
> 4
>
>
> Benefits: no shell, single process forked, no explicit selinux
On 11. 05. 22 15:27, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PythonSafePath
== Summary ==
The [https://docs.python.org/3.11/using/cmdline.html#cmdoption-P `-P`
flag] will be added to the Python shebang macros
(`%{py3_shbang_opts}`, `%{py3_shebang_flags}`, ...). Packages that
ad
On Fr, 15.07.22 10:03, Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) wrote:
> We recently did
> https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/pull/1840 for Fedora
> CoreOS (more background:
> https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1244 ) and
> I'd like to consider applying this to all Fedora
Hi Fedora devel people,
I am sending this email, as I think that you might be interested in this topic.
We are going to have a talk session below at an event, Nest with
Fedora on 4-6th August after around 2 weeks.[1] The topic is to give
the community an idea of what Fedora people have done to su
On Di, 19.07.22 16:15, Gerd Hoffmann (kra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > Moreover, this allows us to implemented TPM policies that bind to
> > signatures of PCR hashes, instead of the literal hash values. That
> > makes the measurements a *million* times more useful, since we loose
> > the brittleness
Yes, thank you, this fixed it.
I appreciate tthe comment on the spec. I inherited it as a to-be orphan and I
have continued only fixing the spec file at the margins when things break.
Would be happy to have some help in fixing the spec.
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 10:21:38 AM CDT, Ralf
Am 19.07.22 um 16:45 schrieb Globe Trotter via devel:
Thanks, btw, the command here says unknown command (see below).
Btw, the log is here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2004683
The trigger of this breakdown is the sped missing "BuildRequires: gcc"
However, I regret h
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022, at 10:15 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>
> That is the big if. If you have the initrds.
>
> I've hacked up the kernel rpm to also build a initrd (targeting virtual
> machines for starters) and shipping that as (optional) sub-rpm ...
FWIW, every rpm-ostree based system defaults
V Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 01:47:12PM +, Globe Trotter via devel napsal(a):
> However, I get the following error in the build log (of koji):
>
>
>
> checking whether the C compiler works... no
> configure: error: in `/builddir/build/BUILD/osmo-0.4.4':
> configure: error: C compiler cannot create
Thanks, btw, the command here says unknown command (see below).
Btw, the log is here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2004683
Thanks!
$ koji save-failed-tree 2004683
Available commands:
admin commands:
add-channel Add a channel
add-external
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 7:52 AM Globe Trotter via devel
wrote:
> checking whether the C compiler works... no
> configure: error: in `/builddir/build/BUILD/osmo-0.4.4':
> configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
> See `config.log' for more details
>
>
> Where is the config.log?
confi
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> klamav kkofler
> koffice-kivio kkofler, rdieter
These are fixed now, successfully built in Rawhide, and I have closed the
bugs. So they should disappear from your report next time.
Kevin Kofler
___
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 05:03:53PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mo, 18.07.22 14:52, Gerd Hoffmann (kra...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > Problem with measuring the initrd is that we don't have fixed hashes for
> > a given kernel version (due to generating the initrd on the installed
> > system)
On 22/07/19 02:22PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> Now it can be easily mitigated by using fmt8-devel.
>
> Rawhide compose will be fixed automatically soon, as fmt8 provides missing
> libfmt.so.8 shared library.
Yes, the *compose*, but those packages will still need to be fixed to
not FTBFS.
Never mind, I figured this out. Bad oversight on my part.
However, I get the following error in the build log (of koji):
checking whether the C compiler works... no
configure: error: in `/builddir/build/BUILD/osmo-0.4.4':
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log'
Never mind, I figured this out. Bad oversight on my part.
However, I get the following error in the build log (of koji):
checking whether the C compiler works... no
configure: error: in `/builddir/build/BUILD/osmo-0.4.4':
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log'
Hello,
I was trying to fix a minor but severe error in the packging of osmo, and I get
the following error:
$ fedpkg import ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/osmo-0.4.4-2.fc36.src.rpm
Could not execute import_srpm: (52, 'Empty reply from server')
Where is this error from and how do I get around it?
Thanks
Done! golang-github-google-dap and golang-starlark added.
Thanks for the script!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproje
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before branching (August
2022).
Policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
The packages
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 2:23 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 19/07/2022 14:04, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > Unfortunately it's very difficult to "coordinate" things like this with
> > a worldwide community.
>
> True. Nearly impossible without provenpackager righ
Hello everyone,
Due to several circumstances I am stopping all efforts in maintaining
MariaDB 10.3 & 10.4 series in Fedora.
Just before that, I rebased both series to the latest upstream
versions, so you will get all the security patches released as for
today !
MariaDB 10.3:
https://bodhi.fedora
On 19/07/2022 14:04, Richard Shaw wrote:
Unfortunately it's very difficult to "coordinate" things like this with
a worldwide community.
True. Nearly impossible without provenpackager rights, I'd say.
In reality, a week really isn't enough time but we can't have stuff like this
going on for m
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 12/239 (x86_64), 7/167 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed i
On 19/07/2022 13:53, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
So far I am doing my best to fix this breakage. Now I've fixed 5 of these.
Thank you.
Currently as far as I am correct 15 pkgs are still broken - I am slowly
looking at these.
We are working on creating fmt8{,-devel} to mitigate all other breakages
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 4:32 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 19/07/2022 01:28, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > I see https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ee990d1f61
> was
> > pushed with just a handful of builds, while many others are broken. What
>
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote on 2022/07/19 18:31:
On 19/07/2022 01:28, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I see https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ee990d1f61 was pushed
with just a handful of builds, while many others are broken. What happened here?
Maintainers had 1 week to rebuild all t
On 16/07/2022 06:07, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
So what should we do? Now the timing is rather critical because
mass rebuild for F37 is planned at 2022-07-20, which will rebuild fmt-9
on rawhide tree anyway, which will cause rawhide tree breakage.
I'm very sorry for this breakage.
I've checked 6/10
Hello, following the non-responsive maintainer policy
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/)
it seems that lcts (Christopher Engelhard) and jhogarth (James Hogarth) are
non-responsive maintainers for nextcloud package.
Below the bug reports for
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 5:14 AM Marcus Müller wrote:
> Since the pgtk toolkit supports both X and wayland under the hood, I'd
> very much propose
> that we do not only package an emacs-pgtk binary, but also, that it
> becomes what you get
> by default (i.e. when you install and run `emacs`).
Go
On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 at 11:38, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 19/07/2022 01:28, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > I see https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ee990d1f61 was
> > pushed with just a handful of builds, while many others are broken. What
> > happened here?
>
> Maintainers ha
On 19/07/2022 01:28, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I see https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ee990d1f61 was
pushed with just a handful of builds, while many others are broken. What
happened here?
Maintainers had 1 week to rebuild all their packages. Most did nothing.
Blame them, not me.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 05:17:44PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote on 2022/07/19 16:58:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 09:48:33AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dear Ewoud,
Dne 12. 07. 22 v 15:16 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden napsal(a):
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 01:03:59PM +0200,
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220718.0):
ID: 1329942 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote on 2022/07/19 16:58:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 09:48:33AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dear Ewoud,
Dne 12. 07. 22 v 15:16 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden napsal(a):
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 01:03:59PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
rubygem-bundler_ext
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 09:48:33AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dear Ewoud,
Dne 12. 07. 22 v 15:16 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden napsal(a):
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 01:03:59PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
rubygem-bundler_ext jaruga,
ruby-packagers-sig, vondruch
I have an inter
Dear Ewoud,
Dne 12. 07. 22 v 15:16 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden napsal(a):
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 01:03:59PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following
packages
will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before
Gary Buhrmaster writes:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 6:44 AM Petr Lautrbach wrote:
>>
>> Dan Čermák writes:
>> >
>> > Just out of curiosity, how large is the speedup typically?
>> >
>
>>
>> It depends on the number of threads your machine has. But you could get some
>> data for comparison using `f
53 matches
Mail list logo
