Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 11/239 (x86_64), 12/167 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220715.n.0):
ID: 1328291 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso
install
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220715.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220716.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 82
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 6.84 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
...snip...
>
> For this we will create a self-contained boot.iso style image with a
> built-in tar-payload (so that the image can work even without network
> access) based on the latest Anaconda upstream code.
What packages will be in this tar-payload?
And can you use the boot.iso to do netinsta
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 10:03:48AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> We recently did https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/pull/1840 for
> Fedora CoreOS (more background:
> https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1244 ) and I'd like to
> consider applying this to all Fedora e
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 37 Rawhide 20220716.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220715.0):
ID: 1328245 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220715.0):
ID: 1328229 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
In one week (2022-07-23), or slightly later, I will update edflib from
1.21 to 1.22 in Rawhide [1].
This brings a (downstream) .so version bump, since fields are added to
the middle of a structure in a public header [2].
Since edflib is a leaf package, there should be no impact.
[1] https://
On July 15, 2022 9:42:35 PM UTC, Ben Cotton wrote:
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SELinux_Parallel_Autorelabel
>
>This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
>process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
>community feedback. This proposal will onl
Hi,
On July 15, 2022 9:30:48 PM UTC, Ben Cotton wrote:
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Anaconda_Web_UI_preview_image
>
>This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
>process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
>community feedback. This proposal will
Hi,
I plan to merge LXQt 1.1.0 into Rawhide on Monday. This will cause the
follow so-name bumps
%{_libdir}/libfm-qt.so.11
%{_libdir}/libfm-qt.so.11.0.0
%{_libdir}/liblxqt.so.1
%{_libdir}/liblxqt.so.1.1.0
%{_libdir}/libQt5Xdg.so.3
%{_libdir}/libQt5Xdg.so.3.9.0
%{_libdir}/libQt5XdgIconLoader.so.
On 7/16/22 18:50, Zamir SUN wrote:
On 7/14/22 20:59, Jan Grulich wrote:
Hi,
I'm now working on Qt 5.15.5 update in Rawhide. As you probably know,
Qt 5.15 is the last major release of Qt 5 and all the development is
now focused to Qt 6. This means that all the upcoming releases of Qt 5
are
On 7/14/22 20:59, Jan Grulich wrote:
Hi,
I'm now working on Qt 5.15.5 update in Rawhide. As you probably know, Qt
5.15 is the last major release of Qt 5 and all the development is now
focused to Qt 6. This means that all the upcoming releases of Qt 5 are
meant to be bugfix releases and there
We tested this extensively in FreeIPA upstream CI using a separate COPR
repo. Current FreeIPA versions in Fedora are ready and rawhide version of
bind-dyndb-ldap only needs a rebuild.
I'm currently on a sick leave but Peter should be able to handle it with
his bind/bind-dyndb-ldap maintainer right
On 16/07/2022 06:07, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
So what should we do? Now the timing is rather critical because
mass rebuild for F37 is planned at 2022-07-20, which will rebuild fmt-9
on rawhide tree anyway, which will cause rawhide tree breakage.
FTBFS issues will be created.
To avoid this, should
Hey Carl, I've taken over the package and will make it build. Thank you.
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022, at 9:07 AM, Carl George wrote:
> I've just orphaned python-pdir2 as I no longer use it. Feel free to
> take ownership if you like. Fair warning, it's failing to build for
> Python 3.11 in rawhide, and
I've just orphaned python-pdir2 as I no longer use it. Feel free to
take ownership if you like. Fair warning, it's failing to build for
Python 3.11 in rawhide, and updating to the latest version will
require packaging pdm-pep517.
--
Carl George
___
de
17 matches
Mail list logo
