**大晚上的不要去【[http://xj429313.56r5.bid/](http://xj429313.56r5.bid/)】,那里的女人太搔了**
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.or
**大晚上的不要去【[http://xj429313.56r5.bid/](http://xj429313.56r5.bid/)】,那里的女人太搔了**
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.or
**大晚上的不要去【[http://xj429313.56r5.bid/](http://xj429313.56r5.bid/)】,那里的女人太搔了**
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.or
On Thursday, June 9, 2022 5:55:34 PM CDT Stewart Smith wrote:
> Unfortunately I don't think we can [help with EPEL 7] given the
> likely packaging differences
I'd be surprised if there's major differences, unless AL 2 backports newer go
macros.
> the containerd version differences
containerd in E
A few people contact me directly trying to run things like PyTorch, which
requires large amounts of ROCm to get working (most of which Fedora does not
have yet).
I feel like a SIG, or at least some wiki page would help organize things a bit
for those who want to tackle it but are unaware of the
On 6/12/22 Richard Shaw wrote:
So I run into this occasionally and it's still not clear to me. In this
specific case I'm trying to build nanomq[1] and I get the following error:
/usr/bin/ld: CMakeFiles/nano_test.dir/test.c.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against
`.rodata' can not be used when making
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Using the default network configuration tools for the console and for
> release-blocking desktops, it must be possible to establish a working
> connection to common OpenVPN, openconnect-supported and vpnc-supported
> VPN servers with typical configurations.
Is "common" a r
On 6/11/22 19:27, Petr Menšík wrote:
> Because of attitude documented in change for systemd-resolved [1], I
> expect the only change to get this improved would be switch from
> systemd-resolved to anything more DNSSEC friendly. I don't understand
> why, but it seems systemd team is avoiding work
Hello team,
Due to the updated soversion, Openvb 9.1.0 containing several bug fixes
is built with the following side-tag:
fedpkg build --target=f37-build-side-54486
fedpkg build --target=f36-build-side-54488
fedpkg build --target=f35-build-side-54490
The following packages need a rebuild ac
On 2022-06-09 20:29, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 9:32 PM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
On 2022-06-09 10:27, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 11:26 AM Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
On 2022-06-09 01:33, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:51 AM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079833
--
Michal Schorm
Software Engineer
Core Services - Databases Team
Red Hat
--
On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 7:49 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> Ok, this is a weird one. Apparently platform detection either fails or isn'
> "remembered" when "-S ."
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 26/231 (x86_64), 23/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220611.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220612.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 38
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:1.72 MiB
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220611.0):
ID: 1295577 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
14 matches
Mail list logo
