I was curious to see if changes were significant on my old Asus laptop:
```
blackbird:~ # cryptsetup benchmark -c xchacha20,aes-adiantum
# Tests approximatifs en utilisant uniquement la mémoire (pas de stockage E/S).
#Algorithme | Clé | Chiffrement |Déchif
On 07/06/2022 17:23, Fabio Valentini wrote:
While the flathub remote is enabled on Fedora installs OOTB, the
applications that are available from it are filtered:
An unfiltered version has recently been approved[1].
[1]: https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/300
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Za
On 07/06/2022 17:31, Matthew Miller wrote:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/le...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HYBZLG2X2G6GJKAE5VAK6UHQ4B3GNAJS/
There is no real answer there.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
Hello,
I have a similar issue but I am running Windows10 VM on Fedora 35. Windows is
really unstable acting weird and crashing all the time. Tried with different
versions of VirtualBox 6.1.32, 6.1.34 and 6.1.35 with the same result.
Reverting the kernel to 5.17.11 fixes the issue for me.
Best
Once upon a time, Fabio Valentini said:
> Most notably, I don't see any apps based on Electron (or the FFMpeg
> runtime extensions) in that list.
Teams is Electron and includes ffmpeg.
--
Chris Adams
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 03:01:34PM -, Frank R Dana Jr. wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I know we're all busy people, but I'm hoping I can impose on someone with the
> necessary rights to take a look at this, as it's been in limbo for several
> months now.
>
> Basically, I discovered a fairly nasty bug
OK, thanks Matthew!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: http
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 09:24:59AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> For avoidance of doubt, Fedora Legal has decided we may use flathub
> but not rpmfusion. As I explained to you previously, they have also
> decided not to share their reasoning for this.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/l
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 10:26 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 07/06/2022 02:12, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > Kevin, I care about users who do not know about rpmfusion, or have
> > enough technical experience to enable it. Everything you've said only
> > makes sense if users are smart enou
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022, 12:04 AM Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Could it be https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089986 ?
> >
> > There's an update fixing it, so please test:
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/update
On 07/06/2022 16:32, Leigh Scott wrote:
I'm tempted to remove the rpmfusion nvidia & steam repos
(fedora-workstation-repositories package) till there is a full explanation.
This will harm users. Please don't.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
_
The spec-version-maven-plugin license has been "CDDL or GPLv2 with
exceptions". I am about to update to version 2.1 in Rawhide, which
changes the license to "EPL-2.0 or GPLv2 with exceptions". This
change should have no practical consequences for Fedora.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_
> On Tue, Jun 7 2022 at 10:24:46 AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
>
> For avoidance of doubt, Fedora Legal has decided we may use flathub but
> not rpmfusion. As I explained to you previously, they have also decided
> not to share their reasoning for this.
>
> Michael
> On Tue, Jun 7 2022 a
On Tue, Jun 7 2022 at 03:11:41 PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
You could say that about any software that we ship that's missing
features. FESCo decided it's better to include an incomplete or
inferior
implementation that we can legally distribute than no implementation
at
all.
On Tue, Jun 7 2022 at 10:24:46 AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
I will say it again: let's preload the RPM Fusion repository.
It's no longer a legal case, because preloading of Flathub was
explicitly permitted, and it contains almost the same packages:
patent-encumbered and proprieta
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220605.0):
ID: 1290042 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1290042
ID: 1290057 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_os
On Monday, 06 June 2022 at 23:58, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, 05 June 2022 at 19:15, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> >> It is common knowledge that Fedora is/was effectively useless for
> >> anything remotely related to multimedia without
Dne 07. 06. 22 v 11:10 Florian Weimer napsal(a):
* Vít Ondruch:
Dne 03. 06. 22 v 16:32 Tom Stellard napsal(a):
On 6/3/22 02:24, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi Tom,
Since you are looking into this and I like this proposal, have you
considered to look alto into `%extension_*flags`:
https://src.fedora
Hi y'all,
package py3status [1] is looking for a new maintainer. I'm not an active
user of the package (nor i3 WM) anymore and have no capabilities to take
care of it.
It's a nice piece of python code, I hope it won't be orphaned for a long
time ;)
Best,
- jj
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org
Hello all,
As of the 7th of June 2022, Fedora 34 has reached its end of life
for updates and support. No further updates, including security
updates, will be available for Fedora 34. All the updates that are
currently in testing won't get pushed to stable. Fedora 35 will
continue to receive update
* Ben Cotton:
> This change will add new macros which will make it easier for packages
> to add and remove their own compiler flags. This strategy is already
> used to some extent with feature macros like %{_lto_cflags},
> %{_hardening_cflags}, etc, but these new macros will give packagers
> even
* Vít Ondruch:
> Dne 03. 06. 22 v 16:32 Tom Stellard napsal(a):
>> On 6/3/22 02:24, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>> Since you are looking into this and I like this proposal, have you
>>> considered to look alto into `%extension_*flags`:
>>>
>>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-
On 07/06/2022 02:12, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Kevin, I care about users who do not know about rpmfusion, or have
enough technical experience to enable it. Everything you've said only
makes sense if users are smart enough to figure out how to install and
use rpmfusion.
I will say it again: let
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220606.0):
ID: 1289796 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
24 matches
Mail list logo
