Sorry for the late reply. It's working great again.
Thank you for restoring the service and best of luck figuring out the bug
you encountered.
Chris
On Thu., Jun. 2, 2022, 9:45 p.m. Kevin Fenzi, wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 08:34:51PM -0400, Chris wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can't seem to log i
Blaise, I appreciate your offer. I regret I won't have time in the next
several months to be a packaging Elmer myself.
Richard, I've added you as an admin to each of these. Note that kni also
is an admin for SoapySDR and swt2c is an admin for CubicSDR.
Thanks,
Matt N5MLD
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at
On 05/06/2022 15:08, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Vitaly, your suggestions to enable rpmfusion are not helpful for
inexperienced Fedora users, who expect multimedia to work out-of-the-box.
1. This is already documented in the Fedora documentation[1].
2. I asked to preload the RPM Fusion repository
On 05/06/2022 10:02, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
We should really start thinking about this.
Yes. Patents for algorithms hinder the development of humankind.
But there is nothing we can do about it, because Red Hat is registered
in the US organization and must follow their laws.
--
Sincer
On 05/06/2022 10:36, Neal Gompa wrote:
H.264 is supported through OpenH264, and H.265 is not a popular codec.
Aside from Apple services (which are not available to Linux users
anyway), nobody uses H.265 because of the patent situation with HEVC.
It is used by most 4K video files from various to
Michael Catanzaro kirjoitti 5.6.2022 klo 16.08:
On Sat, Jun 4 2022 at 01:05:58 AM +0300, Otto Urpelainen
wrote:
It seems clear that there is a bug somewhere, but I cannot decide,
where, hence this post to devel. Should Fedora's Firefox actually have
media.ffmpeg.enabled set to false by default,
Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> In the US, ATSC 3.0 TV Broadcasts (a nascent but
> growing tech) typically (there are options) uses H.265
> video encoding and AC-4 for audio
Patches to add decoding-only support for that audio format to FFmpeg have
existed for 2 years now, but unfortunately still not mer
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> P.S. Vitaly, your suggestions to enable rpmfusion are not helpful for
> inexperienced Fedora users, who expect multimedia to work
> out-of-the-box. Common multimedia needs like "play a video" absolutely
> need to work without rpmfusion, and we need Fedora developers testi
On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 8:37 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> H.264 is supported through OpenH264, and H.265 is not a popular codec.
> Aside from Apple services (which are not available to Linux users
> anyway), nobody uses H.265 because of the patent situation with HEVC.
In the US, ATSC 3.0 TV Broadcasts
Hey!
Will miss this meeting next week too as https://susecon.com/ is starting
On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 2:25 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> # Date: 2022-06-06
> # Time: 15:00 UTC
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
> # Location: #fedora-meet
On Sat, Jun 4 2022 at 01:05:58 AM +0300, Otto Urpelainen
wrote:
It seems clear that there is a bug somewhere, but I cannot decide,
where, hence this post to devel. Should Fedora's Firefox actually have
media.ffmpeg.enabled set to false by default, because Fedora's variant
of ffmpeg has this prob
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220602.0):
ID: 1288987 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1288987
ID: 1288988 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd
On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 9:37 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 04/06/2022 22:43, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> > But the question is, what needs to be done so that ffmpeg-free will not
> > suffer, either.
>
> ffmpeg-free is a special stripped version. Popular codecs H.264 and
> H.265 were remove
Il 05/06/22 09:37, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel ha scritto:
> On 04/06/2022 22:43, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
>> But the question is, what needs to be done so that ffmpeg-free will not
>> suffer, either.
> ffmpeg-free is a special stripped version. Popular codecs H.264 and
> H.265 were removed due to the
Il 05/06/22 05:13, Qiyu Yan ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I encountered a pushing failure after editing a update from side-tag,
> bodhi says
>
> FEDORA-2022-a0a90518a0 ejected from the push because "Cannot find
> relevant tag for fcitx5-5.0.17-1.fc36. None of ['f36-build-side-53961']
> are in [... lot of t
On 04/06/2022 22:43, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
But the question is, what needs to be done so that ffmpeg-free will not
suffer, either.
ffmpeg-free is a special stripped version. Popular codecs H.264 and
H.265 were removed due to the legal reasons. You should always use the
fully featured version
16 matches
Mail list logo
