On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 2:57 AM Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>
> On Sat, 28 May 2022 20:52:51 +0200, you wrote:
>
> >On 28/05/2022 19:31, drago01 wrote:
> >> That's incorrect. They can be outdated, but there is no inherit reason
> >> why they have to be.
> >
> >Most upstreams don't care about bundled l
On Sat, 28 May 2022 20:52:51 +0200, you wrote:
>On 28/05/2022 19:31, drago01 wrote:
>> That's incorrect. They can be outdated, but there is no inherit reason
>> why they have to be.
>
>Most upstreams don't care about bundled libraries. They bundle them once
>and then forget.
But most != all as
Hi All,
I am looking for someone to take over the pam_radius packaging as I no
longer have time to do so.
Thanks in advance
JT
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
F
On ۱۴۰۱/۳/۲ ۱۱:۵۵ بعدازظهر, Sebastian Crane wrote:
...
I did notice that the 'How to Test' section of the proposal was empty;
just as a suggestion, please could we have some screenshots of the
main Persian fonts used in Fedora currently? I'm mostly just curious,
but it might be useful for testin
On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 2:53 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 28/05/2022 19:31, drago01 wrote:
> > That's incorrect. They can be outdated, but there is no inherit reason
> > why they have to be.
>
> Most upstreams don't care about bundled libraries. They bundle them once
> and then forget
Hi,
Would like to unretire ufo2ft[1][2]. The package is useful for building
font packages from source, which the Fedora font packaging policy
encourages.
Regards,
Benson
1 https://github.com/googlefonts/ufo2ft
2 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-ufo2ft
__
On 28/05/2022 19:31, drago01 wrote:
That's incorrect. They can be outdated, but there is no inherit reason
why they have to be.
Most upstreams don't care about bundled libraries. They bundle them once
and then forget.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
On Friday, May 27, 2022, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 26/05/2022 19:31, drago01 wrote:
>
>> But bundled libs and properly tested / certified vs dynamic linking and
>> less testing / no certification.
>>
>
> Bundled libraries are always outdated and even vul
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 8/231 (x86_64), 13/161 (aarch64)
New failures (sam
Dear Pavel,
Nice to see you here :)
On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 3:33 PM Pavel Odintsov
wrote:
> Hello, Fedora developer community!
>
> My name is Pavel Odintsov and I'm a software engineer with a passion for
> computer networks. I'm author of FastNetMon Community, a tool for lightning
> fast volume
Hello!
Thank you for your warm welcome. Happy to be part of the community.
On Sat, 28 May 2022 at 15:21, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hey Pavel,
> Welcome aboard!
>
> сб, 28 мая 2022 г. в 15:33, Pavel Odintsov :
> >
> > Hello, Fedora developer community!
> >
> > My name is Pavel Odintsov and I'm a s
Hey Pavel,
Welcome aboard!
сб, 28 мая 2022 г. в 15:33, Pavel Odintsov :
>
> Hello, Fedora developer community!
>
> My name is Pavel Odintsov and I'm a software engineer with a passion for
> computer networks. I'm author of FastNetMon Community, a tool for lightning
> fast volumetric DDoS attack
Hello, Fedora developer community!
My name is Pavel Odintsov and I'm a software engineer with a passion for
computer networks. I'm author of FastNetMon Community, a tool for lightning
fast volumetric DDoS attack detection.
My software engineering skills are most solid around C++ with a deep
under
To maybe make a suggestion or two that would help in the case of rescue
but also directing the newbie to a better more satisfying
installation/recovery experience ...
* Put Fedora Media writer on the get Fedora page as the preferred
method of getting Fedora with the option to go directly to wh
Since I think this didn't make it to the list ...
On Sat, 2022-05-28 at 11:54 +0200, Christopher Klooz wrote:
> On 28/05/2022 00:34, Stephen Snow wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 09:52 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 09:38:43AM -0400, Stephen Snow wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 20
Hello,
I don't think this got through to the dev mail list, I'll forward it
and add more comments. Thanks.
Stephen
On Sat, 2022-05-28 at 11:54 +0200, Christopher Klooz wrote:
> On 28/05/2022 00:34, Stephen Snow wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 09:52 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 27
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220527.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220528.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 82
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.38 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On 28/05/2022 00:34, Stephen Snow wrote:
On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 09:52 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 09:38:43AM -0400, Stephen Snow wrote:
On Wed, 2022-05-25 at 14:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
The rescue mode has always been on the traditional installer
images,
not the
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220527.0):
ID: 1282396 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 1282380 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1282380
ID: 1282388 Test: aarch64 Cloud_B
20 matches
Mail list logo
