Re: Fwd: ImageMagick in EPEL 8

On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 3:01 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > I'm going change this thread to epel-devel , > > On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 11:40 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > > Shared message to address an issue below. > > > Forwarded Message > Subject: ImageMagick in EPEL 8 > Date: Wed,

Re: Live USB rescue mode, do we still have one? Does it work?

On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 13:13 -0400, Robert Marcano via devel wrote: > On 5/27/22 12:52 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote: > > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 09:38:43AM -0400, Stephen Snow wrote: > > > On Wed, 2022-05-25 at 14:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > > > > The rescue mode has always been on the tr

Re: Live USB rescue mode, do we still have one? Does it work?

On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 09:52 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 09:38:43AM -0400, Stephen Snow wrote: > > On Wed, 2022-05-25 at 14:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > > The rescue mode has always been on the traditional installer > > > images, > > > not the lives. It's sti

Re: Fwd: ImageMagick in EPEL 8

I'm going change this thread to epel-devel ,  On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 11:40 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Shared message to address an issue below. > > > Forwarded Message Subject: ImageMagick in EPEL 8 > Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 15:20:54 -0700 From: Patrick J. LoPresti > To:

Fwd: ImageMagick in EPEL 8

Shared message to address an issue below. Forwarded Message Subject:ImageMagick in EPEL 8 Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 15:20:54 -0700 From: Patrick J. LoPresti To: l...@fedoraproject.org Hi. I just noticed that ImageMagick in EPEL for RHEL8 uses major version nu

Re: Live USB rescue mode, do we still have one? Does it work?

On 5/27/22 12:52 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote: On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 09:38:43AM -0400, Stephen Snow wrote: On Wed, 2022-05-25 at 14:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: The rescue mode has always been on the traditional installer images, not the lives. It's still there. Unfortunately there is no re

Re: Live USB rescue mode, do we still have one? Does it work?

On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 09:38:43AM -0400, Stephen Snow wrote: > On Wed, 2022-05-25 at 14:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > The rescue mode has always been on the traditional installer images, > > not the lives. It's still there. > > > Unfortunately there is no rescue option on the Fedora L

Feedback on New Anaconda Installer

Hi everyone, The User Experience Research team at Red Hat is conducting a study on Anaconda Installer's new interface. If you are interested in an opportunity to influence the future of Anaconda Installer, please fill out this brief survey

Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)

> Am 27.05.2022 um 17:37 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > : > > On 27/05/2022 15:30, Peter Boy wrote: >> Really sorry, but such a statement is simply intellectual bullshit. >> Unfortunately, it is not possible to formulate this in a more friendly yet >> unambiguous way. And in this thread i

Fedora-Rawhide-20220527.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 11/231 (x86_64), 14/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220526.n.0): ID: 1280864 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso an

Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 27/05/2022 15:30, Peter Boy wrote: Really sorry, but such a statement is simply intellectual bullshit. Unfortunately, it is not possible to formulate this in a more friendly yet unambiguous way. And in this thread in particular, the many allegations, unclouded by any expertise but made all

Re: remove-retired-packages feedback

On Thu, 26 May 2022 15:52:06 +0200 Miroslav Suchý wrote: > If you already upgraded to Fedora 36 - what is your feedback about > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/latest/release-notes/sysadmin/System_Utilities/#remove-retired-packages > > Did you run the command `remove-retired-packa

Re: remove-retired-packages feedback

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 1:52 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > If you already upgraded to Fedora 36 - what is your feedback about > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/latest/release-notes/sysadmin/System_Utilities/#remove-retired-packages > > Did you run the command `remove-retired-packages`

Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)

> Am 27.05.2022 um 14:00 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > : > > Bundled libraries are always outdated and even vulnerable. Really sorry, but such a statement is simply intellectual bullshit. Unfortunately, it is not possible to formulate this in a more friendly yet unambiguous way. And in

Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)

> Am 27.05.2022 um 14:00 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > : > > Bundled libraries are always outdated and even vulnerable. Really sorry, but such a statement is simply intellectual bullshit. Unfortunately, it is not possible to formulate this in a more friendly yet unambiguous way. And in

Re: Live USB rescue mode, do we still have one? Does it work?

On Wed, 2022-05-25 at 14:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2022-05-25 at 16:40 -0400, Stephen Snow wrote: > > Hello, > > I was doing my usual round of reading comments on ask.fp.o and came > > across an individual having difficulty getting their system > > (?back?) up > > and running, afte

Re: SPDX identifiers in old branches?

On 26. 05. 22 17:16, Maxwell G via devel wrote: On Thursday, May 26, 2022 9:14:14 AM CDT Petr Pisar wrote: Does a marker of the conversion need to be visible in the binary packages? I think it should be. According to the Change Proposal, "the use of a standardized identifier for license will

Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 26/05/2022 20:29, Stephen Snow wrote: Libraries are bundled into jars not the source, etc... this all snowballs across what 4 version now supported? OpenJDK is a native ELF binary, not a JAR. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

CPE Weekly Update – Week 21 2022

Hi everyone, This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering) Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat (https://libera.chat/). Week: 23rd May - 27th May 2022 If you wish to read this in for

Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 26/05/2022 19:31, drago01 wrote: But bundled libs and properly tested / certified vs dynamic linking and less testing / no certification. Bundled libraries are always outdated and even vulnerable. We should avoid bundling as much as possible. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycod

Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 26/05/2022 17:40, drago01 wrote: Why would we do that? Is the build process really more important than shipping tested software? Yes. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220527.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220526.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220527.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 39 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 61.65 KiB Size of dropped packages

Re: libsoup 2 -> 3 migration plan and timeline (action required if you depend on libsoup)

On Thu, 2022-05-26 at 14:37 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Still, hopefully we can manage this transition without applications > winding up broken in stable Fedoras. Hi, for what it's worth, I have a COPR repo for Fedora 36, which includes several packages to use/build with/... libsoup

[Test-Announce] Fedora 37 Rawhide 20220527.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 37 Rawhide 20220527.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220527.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220526.0): ID: 1280791 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: libsoup 2 -> 3 migration plan and timeline (action required if you depend on libsoup)

On 26. 05. 22 21:42, Ben Cotton wrote: Thanks for the long lead time. If you submit this as an F39 Change proposal now, you'll be the very first for that release (and perhaps even break churchyard's unofficial "most in-advance Change proposal submission). You can, of course, wait a while to do th

Re: Go-Sig spring cleaning

On Thursday, 26 May 2022 at 23:01, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: [...] > I would ask of all of you to make sure all your packages have been > added to the @go-sig group on src.fedoraproject.org (at least with > "commit" access), unless there is a very good reason not to do so (and > if that is the

Re: remove-retired-packages feedback

> On 26 May 2022, at 14:52, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > If you already upgraded to Fedora 36 - what is your feedback about > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/latest/release-notes/sysadmin/System_Utilities/#remove-retired-packages > >

Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 5/26/22 14:17, Stephen Snow wrote: Also, it may be good to take a look at what AdoptOpenJDK is doing with the Eclipse Foundation based Adoptium Project, specifically the Eclipse Temurin subproject https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/eclipse-temurin-compliance which is going to handle the