Hi Fedora users, developers, and friends!
It's time to start thinking about Test Days for Fedora 37.
For anyone who isn't aware, a Test Day is an event usually focused
around IRC for interaction and a Wiki page for instructions and results,
with the aim being to get a bunch of interested users an
On Fri, 2022-05-20 at 12:18 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Now that FESCo has decided (1) that Fedora will keep supporting BIOS
> booting, the people working on Fedora's bootloader stack will need
> help from the Fedora community to keep Fedora booting on systems which
> require Legacy
On Sun, 22 May 2022 at 15:18, Sandro Mani wrote:
> (apparently the -ow...@fedoraproject.org mails don't work
> anymore?)
>
>
I believe it has been -maintain...@fedoraproject.org for a while,
but I do not know how long.
scotch-maintainers: d...@fedoraproject.org,sm...@fedoraproject.org
scotch-mai
Hi
Some time ago I've started working on updating to scotch-7.x, with some
initial test builds here [1]. To finalize the update, I'd like to gather
some opinions (potentially affected maintainers in CC):
- Should metis get retired? Scotch has a scotchmetis compatibility
library which is adve
(apparently the -ow...@fedoraproject.org mails don't work anymore?)
On 22.05.22 20:57, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
Some time ago I've started working on updating to scotch-7.x, with
some initial test builds here [1]. To finalize the update, I'd like to
gather some opinions (potentially affected mai
On 5/22/22 01:58, Glorious Hellosway via devel wrote:
> That will create a very big performance hit, and disabling SMT will half the
> amount of threads. On the new CPUs with E and P cores, this can significantly
> decrease performance.
Speculative execution mitigations are table stakes if you w
Hi
I've now merged the side tag. Remarks:
- opencv failed to build due to noarch -doc subpackage building
differently on different arches. This caused by the intel_va sample only
being included on x86 arches. I've made the -doc subpackge arched to
solve this.
- python-PyMuPDF test fail due to
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 35/231 (x86_64), 18/161 (aarch64)
New failures (sa
On Sun, 22 May 2022 at 06:52, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 10:30:48AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 21/05/2022 20:57, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > > I think Fedora should go use an 0077 umask for this reason.
> >
> > Fedora is a general purpose dis
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 10:30:48AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 21/05/2022 20:57, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > I think Fedora should go use an 0077 umask for this reason.
>
> Fedora is a general purpose distribution, so umask 0077 will create more
> problems than it solves.
>
> Al
On Saturday, 21 May 2022 19:31:59 BST Glorious Hellosway via devel wrote:
> For `slab_nomerge`, it can lead to very slight increase of kernel memory.
> `init_on_alloc=1` has a almost no performance impact, it is under 1% and is
> usually within standard error, but there is bug with zfs that can mak
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220521.0):
ID: 1275696 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 21/05/2022 03:00, Neal Gompa wrote:
I think we should complete the transition to 0022 umask.
+1 to 0022.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 21/05/2022 20:57, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
I think Fedora should go use an 0077 umask for this reason.
Fedora is a general purpose distribution, so umask 0077 will create more
problems than it solves.
Also by default the /home directories have 0700 chmod so no one but the
owner can acce
Hi,
i wrote:
> > If test_oldlayout.iso does not boot, then i am quite clueless.
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> I'm afraid that this is the case.
What a naughty machine. :))
I'll think about making a BIOS-only GRUB ISO, just for testing.
(Am busy with finding out how to merge the two De
15 matches
Mail list logo
