Re: Static library linking error

2022-05-09 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Richard Shaw wrote on 2022/05/10 12:07: I'm working on some IIoT related packages in my COPR where I have a dynamic library linking to a static library and getting the following error: /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/12/../../../../lib64/libmqttc.a(mqtt.c.o): warning: relocation

Re: upstream systemd discussion about MACAddressPolicy for bonds and bridges

2022-05-09 Thread Tom Hughes via devel
On 10/05/2022 03:12, Dusty Mabe wrote: Just wanted to point interested people in the direction of an upstream discussion about how (by default) the MAC address should get set for bond and bridge devices. https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2022-May/047893.html A few of us were

`ansible` Package License Change

2022-05-09 Thread Maxwell G via devel
The license of `ansible` 2.9.x has been corrected from `GPLv3+` to `GPLv3+ and BSD and Python and MIT and ASL 2.0`. The previous `License:` tag did not properly account for the multi-licensing. Please note that this only applies to EPEL and Fedora 34 and 35. The license of `ansible` 5.x (the co

upstream systemd discussion about MACAddressPolicy for bonds and bridges

2022-05-09 Thread Dusty Mabe
Just wanted to point interested people in the direction of an upstream discussion about how (by default) the MAC address should get set for bond and bridge devices. https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2022-May/047893.html A few of us were originally going to propose a change to F

Heads-up: grpc 1.46.0 coming to Rawhide with C (core) and C++ soname bumps

2022-05-09 Thread Ben Beasley
In one week (May 16), or slightly later, I will build grpc 1.46.0 for Rawhide (F37). Fedora’s grpc is a few months behind upstream, at 1.41.1, so this update skips a few releases. As is traditional for minor releases of grpc, the C++ ABI was broken (soversion bumped from 1.41 to 1.46). This ti

Re: fedpkg sources - downloading unused source files: opt-in/opt-out

2022-05-09 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 7:00 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 01:21:53PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 1:13 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 09:45:55PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote: > > > > Ondrej Nosek kirjoitti 4.5.2022 klo 18.01: >

Re: fedpkg sources - downloading unused source files: opt-in/opt-out

2022-05-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 01:21:53PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 1:13 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 09:45:55PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote: > > > Ondrej Nosek kirjoitti 4.5.2022 klo 18.01: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > A few months ago fedpkg introduc

Fedora CoreOS streams rebasing to Fedora Linux 36

2022-05-09 Thread Dusty Mabe
Following our scheduling policy around Fedora major version releases [1] we will be rolling out the Fedora Linux 36 rebase over the next few weeks. This will start tomorrow with the `testing` stream. During this development cycle we continued to follow the Fedora Change process more closely [2] i

Re: Fedora 36 Release Notes, do we have some?

2022-05-09 Thread Ben Cotton
The #docs tag on Fedora Discussion is a better place to ask this question, but the F36 docs will be published to the website prior to the release tomorrow. In the meantime, I've added them to the config for docs.stg.fedoraproject.org, so you'll be able to see them there after the next rebuild: http

Re: Strange messages in Bodhi (ejected from push?)

2022-05-09 Thread Ron Olson
It was successful, apparently: ➜ ~ koji tag-build f36-updates-candidate swift-lang-5.6-1.fc36 Created task 86848500 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 86848500 tagBuild (noarch): free 86848500 tagBuild (noarch): free -> closed 0 free 0 open 1 done 0 failed 86848500 tagBuild

Fedora 36 Release Notes, do we have some?

2022-05-09 Thread Miro Hrončok
Hello. I have recently contributed to the Fedora 36 Release Notes [1] and I need to be able to link to that page. However, despite the release in less than a day, I still see no Fedora 36 Release Notes at https://docs.fedoraproject.org Is this a thing that is tracked and will happen when we

Re: Strange messages in Bodhi (ejected from push?)

2022-05-09 Thread Mikel Olasagasti
Hi Ron, Hau idatzi du Ron Olson (tachokni...@gmail.com) erabiltzaileak (2022 mai. 9, al. (22:15)): > > Hi all- > > I got several strange messages on my update here: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-bf60d68bdc > > The (multiple) messages suggest the update was ejected, but I

Strange messages in Bodhi (ejected from push?)

2022-05-09 Thread Ron Olson
Hi all- I got several strange messages on my update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-bf60d68bdc The (multiple) messages suggest the update was ejected, but I tested an install on a fresh image of 35 and 5.6.1 installed fine. Did I do something wrong? Thanks, Ron _

Re: fedpkg sources - downloading unused source files: opt-in/opt-out

2022-05-09 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 1:13 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 09:45:55PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote: > > Ondrej Nosek kirjoitti 4.5.2022 klo 18.01: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > A few months ago fedpkg introduced a change which avoids downloading > > > source > > > files (from dist-

Re: fedpkg sources - downloading unused source files: opt-in/opt-out

2022-05-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 09:45:55PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote: > Ondrej Nosek kirjoitti 4.5.2022 klo 18.01: > > Hi all, > > > > A few months ago fedpkg introduced a change which avoids downloading source > > files (from dist-git) that are not used in the specfile and therefore > > downloading th

Fedora-Rawhide-20220509.n.0 compose check report

2022-05-09 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 12/231 (x86_64), 22/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed

Re: [Test-Announce] 2022-05-09 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2022-05-09 Thread Luna Jernberg
Joining this meeting today :) On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 12:45 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting > # Date: 2022-05-09 > # Time: 15:00 UTC > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) > # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat > > Greetings testers! >

Re: abidiff failure even with samba.abignore

2022-05-09 Thread Pavel Filipensky
Created https://github.com/rpminspect/rpminspect/issues/739 On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 3:45 PM David Cantrell wrote: > On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 12:44:41PM +0200, Pavel Filipensky wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am trying to fix a failure reported here > > > https://osci-jenkins-1.ci.fedoraproject.org/job/fe

Re: abidiff failure even with samba.abignore

2022-05-09 Thread David Cantrell
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 12:44:41PM +0200, Pavel Filipensky wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to fix a failure reported here > https://osci-jenkins-1.ci.fedoraproject.org/job/fedora-ci/job/rpminspect-pipeline/job/master/98577/testReport/(root)/tests/_abidiff/ > : > > Details: > Command: abidiff > /var/

Subject: Self Introduction: iurii Mykhalskyi

2022-05-09 Thread Iurii Mykhalskyi
Hello everyone, My name is Iurii. I'm an embedded/Linux kernel developer and previously has some touches with open-sources community during upstream functionality into Xen Hypervisor, Linux kernel and Yocto (a little bit :) ). Now I would like to help with supporting xmonad-related packages in F

Re: abidiff failure even with samba.abignore

2022-05-09 Thread Sérgio Basto
A seg, 09-05-2022 às 12:44 +0200, Pavel Filipensky escreveu: > Hi, > > I am trying to fix a failure reported here > https://osci-jenkins-1.ci.fedoraproject.org/job/fedora-ci/job/rpminspect-pipeline/job/master/98577/testReport/(root)/tests/_abidiff/ > : > Details: > Command: abidiff /var/tmp/rpmins

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220509.n.0 changes

2022-05-09 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220508.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220509.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 25 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 56.06 KiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

abidiff failure even with samba.abignore

2022-05-09 Thread Pavel Filipensky
Hi, I am trying to fix a failure reported here https://osci-jenkins-1.ci.fedoraproject.org/job/fedora-ci/job/rpminspect-pipeline/job/master/98577/testReport/(root)/tests/_abidiff/ : Details: Command: abidiff /var/tmp/rpminspect/samba-4.16.1.KNxchl/before/i686/samba-libs-4.16.1-3.fc37.i686//usr/li

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220509.0 compose check report

2022-05-09 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220508.0): ID: 1260603 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: Uninitialized variables and F37

2022-05-09 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 01:04:51PM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote: > Hello, > > This is a continuation of the discussion from F36 Change: GNU Toolchain > Update. snip. > He talks about -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero being used for production builds > and -ftrivial-auto-var-init= being used for debug

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2022-05-09 Thread Miro Hrončok
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If