Fedora-Rawhide-20220508.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 8/231 (x86_64), 27/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220507.n.0): ID: 1259992 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-is

Fedora-IoT-37-20220508.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (aarch64) ID: 1260327 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1260327 ID: 1260340 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification@uefi URL: https

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220508.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220507.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220508.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 37 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 60.36 KiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220508.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220507.0): ID: 1259811 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: fedpkg sources - downloading unused source files: opt-in/opt-out

Sérgio Basto kirjoitti 8.5.2022 klo 7.52: On Wed, 2022-05-04 at 21:45 +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote: Author of the patch under discussion here. The premise was that "specfile sources" equal "sources file sources". Since there is a request like this, that is apparently not always the case. Hi,

Re: Does F36 handle $RPM_OPT_FLAGS differently?

On 07/05/2022 22:44, Julian Sikorski wrote: I have constructs like these in my RPM spec files: Use this: %global optflags %(echo %{optflags} | sed 's/-g /-g1 /') -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@