Germano Massullo wrote on 2022/04/10 22:37:
Thank you very much Mamoru! Why don't you submit your patch to upstream
repository, so you get the credit? We will need to patch such thing upstream
anyways!
Now submitted:
https://github.com/BOINC/boinc/pull/4737
Regards,
Mamoru
__
# F36 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2022-05-02
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
Hi folks! We have 1 proposed Final blockers and 5 proposed Final freeze
exception issues to review, so let's have a review meeting on Monday.
If you have time this weekend, you
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't
have anything much for the agenda. There will be a blocker review
meeting.
If you're aware of anything it would be useful to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can run the meeting.
Thanks folks!
--
Adam Willi
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Nodejs18
==
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StrongCryptoS
On 4/28/22 23:49, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:38 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
>>
>> On 4/28/22 07:09, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:08 PM Demi Marie Obenour
>>> wrote:
On 4/27/22 07:40, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26,
On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 14:41 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
>
> 1. selinux-policy — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056303 —
> ON_QA
> After upgrade to F36 several packages fail to update due to
> selinux-related errors
>
> selinux-policy updates to address this are in F34, F35, and F36
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 7:14 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>
> In one week modello package will be updated in rawhide (Fedora 37)
> from version 1.11 to version 2.0.0.
>
> Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053953
> PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/modello/pull-request/4
Bodhi h
Missing expected images:
Xfce live x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Soas live x86_64
Mate live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 3/22 (x86_64)
ID: 1247350 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1247350
ID: 1247364 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-is
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 2:41 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> We are now targeting target date #2 (2022-05-10). If we slip again, we
> won't release until after the Release Party!
That should be target date #3, of course. The date is still 2022-05-10.
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
We are now targeting target date #2 (2022-05-10). If we slip again, we
won't release until after the Release Party!
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. selinux-policy — After upgrade to F36 several packages fail to
update due to selinux-related errors — ON_
On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 08:57 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 6:01 PM Björn Persson wrote:
> >
> > Maybe spend two more letters and write "Proposal" instead of "Change"?
>
> That makes sense. "Change", in this usage, is a proper noun, so while
> all proposals are changes, not al
On Thu, 2022-04-28 at 15:36 +0200, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
>
> Do nothing and let them embarrass themselves freely?
> Their target audience is usually smart enough to see through that real quick.
Not The Register's commentariat, anyway. The comments on the Reg
article (which to be fair did use
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 06:01:13PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 12:34:48PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > This upstream fix, which is basically a single line addition:
> >
> > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1825/files
> >
> > is very impor
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 7:21 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:49 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:38 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 4/28/22 07:09, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:08 PM Demi Marie Obenour
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 10:17 AM Jered Floyd wrote:
>
>
> This package is now up for review in BZ:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076374
>
> There's also a GitHub repo for the packaging:
> https://github.com/jeredfloyd/rpm-trafficserver
>
> I've tested it on f35, and have my copr
This package is now up for review in BZ:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076374
There's also a GitHub repo for the packaging:
https://github.com/jeredfloyd/rpm-trafficserver
I've tested it on f35, and have my copr repo (
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jered/trafficserver/) r
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 22/161 (aarch64), 12/231 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220428.n.0):
ID: 1246329 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 6:01 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Maybe spend two more letters and write "Proposal" instead of "Change"?
That makes sense. "Change", in this usage, is a proper noun, so while
all proposals are changes, not all proposals are Changes. But given
the context (and the fact that
> Sadly, some of this is due to the "media" organization's need to drive
page views and not journalistic ignorance of the facts that this is just a
proposal.
> I don't know how you fix the underlying revenue enhancement approaches
that have driven hyperbole and attempts to drive engagement and outr
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:49 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:38 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
> >
> > On 4/28/22 07:09, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:08 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 4/27/22 07:40, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220428.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220429.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 81
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 31.62 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi,
José Abílio Matos wrote:
After today's update to openssl-1:3.0.2-4.fc36.x86_64 the problem is
gone. :-)
This means your mail server does not support TLS 1.2. You will have to keep
your system set to crypto-policy LEGACY to connect to the server.
I would recommend contacting your mail s
On Monday, 14 March 2022 16.53.18 WEST José Abílio Matos wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> I copied and pasted and while changing the option I left one of those rogue
> characters, keeping always the preffix. :-(
>
>
> I will try and see your suggestion.
After today's update to openssl-1:3.0.2-4.fc36.x86
Hi everyone,
This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering)
Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this
report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat
(https://libera.chat/).
Week: 25th April - 29th April 2022
If you wish to read th
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64), 1/8 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220428.0):
ID: 1246042 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL:
26 matches
Mail list logo
