On Monday, 18 April 2022 at 12:17, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > > > Dell XPS 15 L502X 8GB RAM (BIOS only)
>
> BIOS-only on a laptop might mean the firmware quirk which demands
> to see the "boot/active" flag at some MBR partition table slot.
>
> See a
On Monday, 18 April 2022 at 19:00, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 03:12:59PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > I've tested your ISO with:
> >
> > - Dell XPS 15 L502X 8GB RAM (BIOS only) CD-R physical media
> >
> > Booted and started the installer reasonably fast
On Monday, 18 April 2022 at 04:41, John Reiser wrote:
> > - Dell XPS 15 L502X 8GB RAM (BIOS only) CD-R physical media
>
> It would be very nice to run /sbin/dmidecode, which is on the .iso,
> and report the "BIOS Information" section, such as:
Here's mine:
Handle 0x, DMI type 0, 24 bytes
BIO
On 4/15/22 5:06 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
Initial test with a CD-R and an HP Compaq 8510w are mixed.
It boots to GRUB, but it spins a long time blinking the HDD light displaying
nothing but "Welcome to GRUB". It eventually spits out "failure reading
sector 0x4f838 from 'hd31'."
'hd31' loo
Chris Adams writes:
> Once upon a time, Jared Dominguez said:
>> Looks like they are using vSphere, which supports UEFI VMs. The same is
>> true for KVM, Xen and bhyve, so it's more about what feature set cloud
>> providers using these hypervisors are choosing to turn on.
>
> In a way, this is si
Ben Cotton writes:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecateLegacyBIOS
>
> == Summary ==
> Make UEFI a hardware requirement for new Fedora installations on
> platforms that support it (x86_64). Legacy BIOS support is not
> removed, but new non-UEFI installation is not supported on those
Tested this iso with an USB stick on this machine here and it passed the
tests and Anaconda started correctly.
Machine: Type: Laptop System: Hewlett-Packard product: HP G42 Notebook PC
Mobo: Hewlett-Packard model: 1484 v: 77.19 BIOS: Hewlett-Packard v: F.17
date: 07/06/2010
CPU Dual core Pentium T
Hi,
i wrote:
> > xorrisofs option --mbr-force-bootable
Chris Murphy wrote:
> with the bit set it means older versions of
> Tianocore or anything based on Tianocore up until maybe 6 months ago,
> won't boot.
Is this maybe about the code snippet of Tianocore which Alexander E.
Patrakov showed in t
On 17. 04. 22 15:56, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
We have specific issues during an Fedora upgrade.
In past, it was issue with rdma-core [1] during upgrade to F34. Nowadays, for
upgrade to F36, we have an issue with lilv [2]
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919864
[2] https://bugzil
On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 03:12:59PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> I've tested your ISO with:
>
> - Dell XPS 15 L502X 8GB RAM (BIOS only) CD-R physical media
>
> Booted and started the installer reasonably fast
>
> - same machine USB media (written to whole device using dd)
>
> B
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 5:17 AM Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > > > Dell XPS 15 L502X 8GB RAM (BIOS only)
>
> BIOS-only on a laptop might mean the firmware quirk which demands
> to see the "boot/active" flag at some MBR partition table slot.
>
> See a th
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 11:26 AM Ian Pilcher wrote:
>
> I'm not a Fedora developer, just a long time interested user, so take
> this for what it's worth. I'd like to suggest an alternative approach
> to the BIOS boot (and potentially other similar boot issues), or at
> least suggest that this app
I'm not a Fedora developer, just a long time interested user, so take
this for what it's worth. I'd like to suggest an alternative approach
to the BIOS boot (and potentially other similar boot issues), or at
least suggest that this approach be discussed.
Basically, I suggest that Fedora stop wor
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/229 (x86_64), 10/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220417.n.0):
ID: 1229381 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso evince
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1229381
ID: 1229453 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-i
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220417.0):
ID: 1229728 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1229728
Passed openQA tests: 15/15 (x86_64), 14/15 (aarch64)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_jwhois_with_whois_in_Fedora_Workstation
== Summary ==
Fedora Workstation product core group includes `jwhois` package.
Replace it with `whois` package which is more actively developed.
== Detailed Description ==
`Fedora Workstation product core` gro
It would be very nice to run /sbin/dmidecode, which is on the .iso,
and report the "BIOS Information" section, such as:
Is the attached any use?
In the attachment I see these interesting lines (snipped):
=
SMBIOS 3.0.0 present.
BIOS Information
Vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
OLD: Fedora-36-20220417.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220418.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 09:25:36AM -0500, Steve Cossette wrote:
> There aren't too many of them today, but I guess they
> still exist.
I actually use them quite frequently to access remote control on IPMI/KVM
webpages on "older" servers. Luckily newer servers do provide HTML5 based
remote acce
People,
On 2022-04-18 12:41, John Reiser wrote:
- Dell XPS 15 L502X 8GB RAM (BIOS only) CD-R physical media
It would be very nice to run /sbin/dmidecode, which is on the .iso,
and report the "BIOS Information" section, such as:
Is the attached any use?
Phil.
=
# dmidecode 3.3
Getti
Hi,
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > > Dell XPS 15 L502X 8GB RAM (BIOS only)
BIOS-only on a laptop might mean the firmware quirk which demands
to see the "boot/active" flag at some MBR partition table slot.
See a thread of grub-bug (and later grub-devel) from 2015/16
https://marc.info
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220417.0):
ID: 1229296 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Monday, 18 April 2022 at 10:13, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > - same machine USB media (written to whole device using dd)
> > Boot fails with "Operation system not found" error.
>
> (Looks like my optimism was somewhat premature.)
>
> I wonder from
Hi,
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> - same machine USB media (written to whole device using dd)
> Boot fails with "Operation system not found" error.
(Looks like my optimism was somewhat premature.)
I wonder from where this message comes. Was it really "Operation system"
and not "Operati
24 matches
Mail list logo
