# F36 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2022-04-11
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
Hey testers! We have 7 proposed Final blockers and 2 proposed Final freeze
exception issues to review, so let's have a review meeting on Monday. We
also have Go/No-Go coming up o
On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 11:06 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 1:27 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > Windows 11 *does not matter* here.
>
> (Windows) Desktop as a Service (DaaS)[0] may
> change that faster than some expect (or faster
> than some hope). There is a large push by
> s
On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 1:27 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> Windows 11 *does not matter* here.
(Windows) Desktop as a Service (DaaS)[0] may
change that faster than some expect (or faster
than some hope). There is a large push by
some orgs to move services off premise
into the cloud (for a number of sta
Hello all,
Since this conversation several months ago I've been working with the
Wine maintainer on implementing a solution upstream that is compatible
with our requirements and the pretty much universal desire by packagers
to avoid system library imports. I believe I've found a solution that
On 3/30/22 09:49, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 10:44 AM NightStrike wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022, 08:34 Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Hi,
Fedora currently ships Wine 7.3 released February 25th, 2022.
Wine 7.4, released March 11th, started to require a 'llvm-mingw' compiler for
On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 7:08 PM Gabriel Ramirez wrote:
>
> On 4/10/22 16:10, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 4:37 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> > wrote:
> >> On Friday, 08 April 2022 at 16:14, Zamir SUN wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>> Probably it isn't a problem for some users, but I'
On 4/10/22 16:10, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 4:37 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
On Friday, 08 April 2022 at 16:14, Zamir SUN wrote:
[...]
Probably it isn't a problem for some users, but I'm still having bad
experience with UEFI on x86_64 now. Out of my 3 machines I on
On 4/8/22 13:28, Björn Persson wrote:
> Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 7 2022 at 12:30:42 PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher
>> wrote:
>>> Well, it *could* grow an interface to some of the password wallet
>>> services that support TOTP or HOTP codes (like Bitwarden, Lastpass,
>>> 1password, etc
On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 4:37 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
>
> On Friday, 08 April 2022 at 16:14, Zamir SUN wrote:
> [...]
> > Probably it isn't a problem for some users, but I'm still having bad
> > experience with UEFI on x86_64 now. Out of my 3 machines I only have 1
> > system that
On Friday, 08 April 2022 at 16:14, Zamir SUN wrote:
[...]
> Probably it isn't a problem for some users, but I'm still having bad
> experience with UEFI on x86_64 now. Out of my 3 machines I only have 1
> system that works fine with UEFI. And my parents' laptop was purchased
> 2 years ago and the UE
On Friday, 08 April 2022 at 19:14, Brian C. Lane wrote:
[...]
> So like I said yesterday, I'll look into switching to use grub2 for
> Fedora 37, assuming grub2 continues to support BIOS.
Thank you very much! From my side, I've found another BIOS-only machine
in my junkyard and I'm willing to put b
On Friday, 08 April 2022 at 13:41, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 08/04/2022 09:54, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > I already did. Isn't that what I wrote?
>
> Can you post their answer?
Yes:
```
On VPS, we do not provide images with UEFI enabled.
```
They support UEFI on their P
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 10:43:02AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mi, 06.04.22 07:33, Neal Gompa (ngomp...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Irrespective of this change, I would flat-out oppose moving to
> > sd-boot. In any case, you can't use sd-boot for live media.
> >
> > If we were going to move to
On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 10:27:25AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> And we can take incremental steps to get there, even now:
>
> 1. Switch Anaconda to default to GPT even on BIOS setups
> 2. Drop syslinux and use GRUB everywhere
> 3. Configure new installations to always do hybrid boot installations
>
On 4/10/22 16:27, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 10:51 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 6:01 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
Moving past the Big Three(tm), the actual
cloud providers that matter from a Fedora context are the smaller
outfits that principally serve Linux users.
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 16/161 (aarch64), 6/229 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220409.n.0):
ID: 1219385 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso support_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1219385
ID: 1219399 Test: aarch64 Serv
Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Possible solution is to check if compiler (target) supports -msse3 and
> -mavx first, and it they are not supported, don't pass them to CPPFLAGS on
> AC_CHECK_DECL
It shall be noted that unconditionally compiling with these flags on x86_64
will make the program fail to run
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 10/231 (x86_64), 20/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220408.n.2):
ID: 1218926 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso de
On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 2:23 PM Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
> Michel Alexandre Salim writes:
>
> > - as I stated, there are offers to help with getting syslinux replaced
> > with GRUB. what I've not stated originally is Chris Murphy brought up
> > protective MBR and switching all new installs to i
Thank you very much Mamoru! Why don't you submit your patch to upstream
repository, so you get the credit? We will need to patch such thing
upstream anyways!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-
On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 10:51 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 6:01 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > Moving past the Big Three(tm), the actual
> > cloud providers that matter from a Fedora context are the smaller
> > outfits that principally serve Linux users. These are companies lik
Hi,
Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
> I imagine it is like those polyglot programs, that are simultaneously valid
> in several totally different programming languages:
Yep. A boot-everywhere ISO for x86 is quite like that.
Every firmware variant can see in it what it expects.
> Actually, I have already
On 4/10/22 05:50, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 6:01 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
Moving past the Big Three(tm), the actual
cloud providers that matter from a Fedora context are the smaller
outfits that principally serve Linux users. These are companies like
DigitalOcean, Linode (Akam
OLD: Fedora-36-20220409.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220410.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On 4/10/22 09:56, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
Maybe I should try adapting my code, so that it finds the GRUB BIOS boot
partition and loads it?
This would be a nice stunt for which we would have to find a use case.
As stated yesterday, the GRUB El Torito image contains a c
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220408.n.2
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220410.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 60
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 768.69 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220409.0):
ID: 1218832 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220409.0):
ID: 1218816 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
28 matches
Mail list logo
