On 03. 04. 22 23:47, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
There hasn't been an update to the fedora-obsolete-packages package after the
upgrade testing that was done last month in preparation for the release of F36.
There are currently 3 open bugs that are targetted against F36 [1, 2, 3]. Since
we ar
On 4/4/22 10:09, Brandon Nielsen via devel wrote:
On 4/3/22 6:45 PM, Ian Laurie wrote:
I noticed in VirtualBox with GNOME and 20220401.n.0 that if I resized
the VM window when logged into GNOME it slammed me back to the
greeter, apparently without killing my login session.
I still had a VM f
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 12:52 PM Michael J Gruber wrote:
> In particular, this would allow to avoid the many "commit missing patch",
> "actually commit the change",
> "duh" commits which happen after a successful `fedpkg build --scratch --srpm`
> followed by a half-(how do you say this nicely)ed
On 4/4/22 10:00, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/3/22 16:45, Ian Laurie wrote:
I noticed in VirtualBox with GNOME and 20220401.n.0 that if I resized
the VM window when logged into GNOME it slammed me back to the
greeter, apparently without killing my login session.
What video device does VirtualBox
On 4/3/22 6:45 PM, Ian Laurie wrote:
I noticed in VirtualBox with GNOME and 20220401.n.0 that if I resized
the VM window when logged into GNOME it slammed me back to the greeter,
apparently without killing my login session.
I still had a VM from a week ago based on the 1.2 cut, but it was ful
On 4/3/22 16:45, Ian Laurie wrote:
I noticed in VirtualBox with GNOME and 20220401.n.0 that if I resized
the VM window when logged into GNOME it slammed me back to the greeter,
apparently without killing my login session.
What video device does VirtualBox provide to the OS?
__
I noticed in VirtualBox with GNOME and 20220401.n.0 that if I resized
the VM window when logged into GNOME it slammed me back to the greeter,
apparently without killing my login session.
I still had a VM from a week ago based on the 1.2 cut, but it was fully
updated about a week ago. This VM
On Sun, Apr 03, 2022 at 10:47:45PM +0100, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
There hasn't been an update to the fedora-obsolete-packages package after
the upgrade testing that was done last month in preparation for the release
of F36. There are currently 3 open bugs that are targetted against F36 [1,
There hasn't been an update to the fedora-obsolete-packages package after
the upgrade testing that was done last month in preparation for the release
of F36. There are currently 3 open bugs that are targetted against F36 [1,
2, 3]. Since we are entering the final freeze this week, can someone make
3. huhtikuuta 2022 20.38.52 GMT+03:00 "Garry T. Williams"
kirjoitti:
>After upgrading to f36, a dnf upgrade resulted in 156 packages to
>upgrade, including swtpm. This resulted in the following errors:
>
>...
>Upgrading: swtpm-0.7.2-1.20220307git21c90c1.fc36.x86_64
>159/315
>error:
After upgrading to f36, a dnf upgrade resulted in 156 packages to
upgrade, including swtpm. This resulted in the following errors:
...
Upgrading: swtpm-0.7.2-1.20220307git21c90c1.fc36.x86_64 159/315
error: lsetfilecon: (/usr/bin/swtpm;6249a295,
system_u:object_r:swtpm_exec_t:s0)
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 10/229 (x86_64), 7/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220402.n.0):
ID: 1208670 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso
install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1208670
ID: 12087
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 12/231 (x86_64), 21/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220401.n.1):
ID: 1208263 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220402.0):
ID: 1209094 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1209094
Passed openQA tests: 15/15 (x86_64), 14/15 (aarch64)
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 4/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-37-20220402.0):
ID: 1209064 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1209064
ID: 1209066 Test: aar
OLD: Fedora-36-20220402.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220403.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 33
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 48.94 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 11:04 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 01/04/2022 15:33, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > We want to add signatures to individual files that are part of shipped RPMs.
>
> Third attempt to push it through again? It was already rejected by FESCo.
Actually only the second attemp
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220401.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220403.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 44
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 48.93 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On 01/04/2022 15:33, Ben Cotton wrote:
We want to add signatures to individual files that are part of shipped RPMs.
Third attempt to push it through again? It was already rejected by FESCo.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
d
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220402.0):
ID: 1208230 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220402.0):
ID: 1208214 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
21 matches
Mail list logo
