Ah, didn’t know about that url for some reason. I’ll check there next time,
thanks.
On 1 Apr 2022, at 12:02, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 06:19:06AM -0500, Ron Olson wrote:
>> I submitted some builds yesterday and didn’t get any emails,
>> and at least as of 6:18 CDT every link I
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 9/229 (x86_64), 7/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220401.n.1):
ID: 1207718 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1207718
ID: 1207734 Test: x86_64 Serve
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 4/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-37-20220327.0):
ID: 1208190 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1208190
ID: 1208196 Test: aar
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220401.2):
ID: 1208091 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1208091
Old failures (same test
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 06:22:47PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> 1. If you have plenty of bandwidth + enough CPU + RAM:
>
> fedpkg mockbuild && fedpkg commit -sc && fedpkg push && fedpkg build
>
> 2. Or if you don't:
>
> fedpkg commit -sc && fedpkg scratch-build --arches=x86_64 --srpm && fedpkg
On 3/31/22 9:15 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
I think this will get us a working build for x86 and ARM arches.
Almost. x86 and ARM64 build now. ARM 32-bit has a few issues that neither upstream
nor I have time to address. I may end up dropping ARM 32-bit from current Fedora
releases seeing
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
5 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 12/231 (x86_64), 21/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 36 RC 20220402.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_pl
OLD: Fedora-36-20220401.n.1
NEW: Fedora-36-20220402.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 2
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Il 02/04/22 14:45, Vascom ha scritto:
> May be.
> But anyone know about this problem?
>
>
It seems the maintainer is on that. They left a comment on the last
waiver:
https://waiverdb.fedoraproject.org/api/v1.0/waivers/?product_version=fedora-37&subject_type=koji_build&subject_identifier=binutils-2.
On Sat, Apr 2, 2022 at 1:46 PM Vascom wrote:
>
> May be.
> But anyone know about this problem?
The problem of the test failing or the problem of binutils not going
stable? The later is because ot the former. Has someone actually
looked at the failing test?
> сб, 2 апр. 2022 г. в 15:44, Mattia Ve
May be.
But anyone know about this problem?
сб, 2 апр. 2022 г. в 15:44, Mattia Verga via devel
:
>
> Il 02/04/22 14:24, Vascom ha scritto:
> > Hi.
> >
> > How to push this stucked binutils update to rawhide?
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-0d344a9601
>
> Binutils has been f
Il 02/04/22 14:24, Vascom ha scritto:
> Hi.
>
> How to push this stucked binutils update to rawhide?
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-0d344a9601
Binutils has been failing its own testuite for months, since when F36
was Rawhide... maybe it should be fixed instead of blindly wai
Hi.
How to push this stucked binutils update to rawhide?
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-0d344a9601
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Cod
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 9/161 (aarch64), 4/229 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220401.n.0):
ID: 1206900 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso support_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1206900
ID: 1206915 Test: aarch64 Serve
> Am 02.04.2022 um 11:10 schrieb Neal Gompa :
>
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2022 at 4:28 AM Peter Boy wrote:
>>
>>
>> Part of the aforementioned change is a migration tool and a documentation
>> for said tool. Now that the beta is officially released, I tried to find
>> both. Unfortunately unsuccessfu
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220401.0):
ID: 1207680 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Sat, Apr 2, 2022 at 4:28 AM Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
> Part of the aforementioned change is a migration tool and a documentation for
> said tool. Now that the beta is officially released, I tried to find both.
> Unfortunately unsuccessfully.
>
> Please, could someone help me with a pointer where
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220401.0):
ID: 1207664 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https:
Part of the aforementioned change is a migration tool and a documentation for
said tool. Now that the beta is officially released, I tried to find both.
Unfortunately unsuccessfully.
Please, could someone help me with a pointer where I can find those?
_
An old gimp add-on is retiring from Rawhide repository, gimp-dpb (Dave's
Batch Processing). Upstream is no more as their
website no longer exists. The repository is on
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gimp-dbp
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora Design Team
Fedora Design Suite maintainer
21 matches
Mail list logo
