# F36 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2022-03-28
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
Hi folks! We have 6 proposed Final blockers and 2 proposed Final freeze
exception issues to review, so let's have a review meeting on Monday.
Remember, Europeans, if DST kicks i
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2022-03-28
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat
Greetings testers!
It's been a couple of weeks since we met, and Beta has been signed off,
so let's get together and take
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
> > That the service is "oneshot" matters for the "restart" part. What
> > systemd actually does, is queue a "try-restart" job for the marked units.
> > Since this service is not running, that should become noop.
> > There seems to be a bug in the implementati
F36 Beta is go, so it's time to shift to Final blockers. The Final
freeze begins on 5 April, with a target release date of 19 April.
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. grub2 — Windows with bitlocker enabled can't be booted, needs to
use bootnext instead of
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 6/161 (aarch64), 6/229 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220324.n.0):
ID: 1196471 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz evince@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1196471
ID: 1196554 Test: x86_64 uni
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 3:41 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 8:00 AM wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > You are kindly invited to the meeting:
> >ELN SIG on 2022-03-25 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
> >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
> >
> > The meeting will
On 3/24/22 21:18, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>> In point of fact, no. Nobody can. It needs either more positive karma
>> or two more days in testing, under the policy. As I said, the automated
>> test failure is irrelevant to this.
>
> Actually, this is not a critical p
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 9/231 (x86_64), 15/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220324.n.1):
ID: 1195481 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_s
OLD: Fedora-36-20220324.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220325.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 3
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 4:04 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 02:28:52PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 1:36 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > > The Fedora Linux 35 Beta RC4 compose[1] is GO and will be shipped live
> > > on T
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220324.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220325.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 38
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 30.31 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Hi everyone,
This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering)
Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this
report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat
(https://libera.chat/).
If you wish to read this in form of a blog post, check the
On Friday, 25 March 2022 02.20.13 WET Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> At least for both tellico and ghostwriter cases, I tried mockbuild and
> just downgrading binutils / binutils-gold to 2.37-24.fc36.x86_64 makes
linkage
> succeed, so for now I filed against binutils:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show
On 24. 03. 22 15:26, Andrew McNabb wrote:
Hi. I haven't been involved with package maintenance for a number of years, and
I don't think I have any time available to pick this up again in the near
future. Is there anything in particular I should do to help clean up? I thought
this had been done
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220324.0):
ID: 1195210 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 07:51:11PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
>
> > There are two separate steps here: "daemon-reload" and "restart
> > testsystemd.service". Systemd is complaining about "daemon-reload"
> > missing. It isn't internally cognizant of the fac
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220324.0):
ID: 1195191 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 02:28:52PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 1:36 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> > The Fedora Linux 35 Beta RC4 compose[1] is GO and will be shipped live
> > on Tuesday, 29 March 2022.
> >
>
> Fedora 36 obviously :)
>
> Anyway, I just tried to install it in
V Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:56:18AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III napsal(a):
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 21:06:44 +0100,
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 8:57 PM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >
> > I don't really understand what you're saying here. Unless your update
> > is blocked by somet
19 matches
Mail list logo
