On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 11:07:17PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 11:03 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 10:58:59PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > >
> > > Oh, I think I know what's going on. I looked at
> > > src.fedoraproject.org/user/$user.
> > >
I just tried to file an abrt report. It asked me to create an API key
for bugzilla, which I did. But in the end, when it tried to talk to
bugzilla, it got an error.
Does the abrt plugin need to be updated for the recent bugzilla changes?
I have the latest version and there are no pending up
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 11:03 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 10:58:59PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > Oh, I think I know what's going on. I looked at
> > src.fedoraproject.org/user/$user.
> > But those group memberships are only synced if the user logs in, AFAIK?
> > So
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 10:58:59PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Oh, I think I know what's going on. I looked at
> src.fedoraproject.org/user/$user.
> But those group memberships are only synced if the user logs in, AFAIK?
> So ... do these packagers retain provenpackager capabilities in
> dis
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 10:54 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 01:54:08PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 7:29 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > >
> > > In accordance with FESCo policy[1], the following provenpackagers will
> > > be submitted for removal in two we
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 01:54:08PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 7:29 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > In accordance with FESCo policy[1], the following provenpackagers will
> > be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a lack of Koji builds
> > submitted in the last six
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:29:37AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 07. 03. 22 v 19:12 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > I watched it over the weekend, and now it's only 3 days behind. ;(
> > Hopefully it will finish catching up... I'm continuing to watch it.
>
>
> It eventually caught up and I have r
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220318.0):
ID: 1184475 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1184475
ID: 1184478 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_z
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/229 (x86_64), 8/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220318.n.0):
ID: 1184042 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1184042
ID: 1184079 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso
OLD: Fedora-36-20220318.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220319.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 54
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed, 9 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 9/231 (x86_64), 11/161 (aarch64)
New failures (sam
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 7:29 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> In accordance with FESCo policy[1], the following provenpackagers will
> be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a lack of Koji builds
> submitted in the last six months. If you received this directly, you
> can reply off-list to indicate
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220318.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220319.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 34
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/229 (x86_64), 16/161 (aarch64)
ID: 1183151 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1183151
ID: 1183188 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj
I'm going to package kpmcore development version 22.03.80 in Rawhide.
This will bring a soname bump from 11 to 12.
As usual I'll take care of rebuilding dependent packages using
f37-build-side-52128 side-tag. They should just be kde-partitionmanager
and calamares, as I'm aware of.
I'm planning to
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220318.0):
ID: 1183530 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Fabio Valentini wrote on 2022/03/18 22:32:
Probably caused by F36FTBFS issues:
===
- cantor-0:21.12.2-1.fc35 > cantor-0:21.12.1-2.fc36
Version 21.12.2 seems to have failed to build on f36+, but was submitted to f35.
- julia-0:1.7.2-1.fc35 > julia-0:1.7.0.0-1.f
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220318.0):
ID: 1183514 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 36 Candidate Beta-1.2 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the cu
19 matches
Mail list logo
