On 06. 03. 22 10:13, Dan Callaghan wrote:
Lately I haven't had much time to contribute to Fedora packaging and I'm
not using Fedora/EPEL much, so I've decided to orphan all the packages
which I no longer use:
...
nodejs-backbone
This one has an interesting impact on Python packages. python3-no
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 5:03 AM Gordon Messmer wrote:
> I remember in the early days of deltarpm, it would frequently reduce the
> download size on my systems by 70-90%. I know that some people disliked
> that it made updates slower, but I always thought that reducing the
> bandwidth costs at our
On 3/6/22 10:29, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
I have always disliked deltarpms. They expand the size of the
frequently downloaded metadata with little overall benefit.
Wasn't Jonathan's point that the benefit is "little" because of
infrastructure issues?
I remember in the early days of deltarpm
On 3/6/22 18:10, John Reiser wrote:
>
>> I have also strongly disliked deltarpms. They very rarely help and
>> significantly increase attack surface.
> If deltarpm succeeds and both the old .rpm and the new.rpm are signed,
> then how is the attack surface larger, as long as any consumer
> verifie
On 3/6/22 13:39, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
I have also strongly disliked deltarpms. They very rarely help and
significantly increase attack surface.
If deltarpm succeeds and both the old .rpm and the new.rpm are signed,
then how is the attack surface larger, as long as any consumer
verifies t
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220302.0):
ID: 1161826 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1161826
ID: 1161838 Test: x86_64 IoT-
On 3/6/22 13:29, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 8:51 AM Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I'm orphaning deltarpm because, as it's currently used in Fedora, it's
>> not very effective, bugs keep getting opened against it because it's
>> not working as well as it sho
I can take it. I have a fix for some of the problems in make test.
One is the removal of ripemd160 in openssl, the other one is a crash in
python/openssl 3.0 (need to have a conversation with Miro about it to
file it correctly).
Once those 2 are solved, there's a third issue also related to ssl
On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 8:51 AM Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm orphaning deltarpm because, as it's currently used in Fedora, it's
> not very effective, bugs keep getting opened against it because it's
> not working as well as it should (mostly an infra issue as opposed to a
> probl
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 9/161 (aarch64), 8/229 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220305.n.0):
ID: 1161392 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1161392
Old failures (same test f
On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 9:22 AM nick black wrote:
>
> Neal Gompa left as an exercise for the reader:
> > Reduced configuration to offer what we can ship. But it does have
> > H.264 support through OpenH264 and AAC support through fdk-aac-free.
>
> outstanding; it ought support at least everything O
Neal Gompa left as an exercise for the reader:
> Reduced configuration to offer what we can ship. But it does have
> H.264 support through OpenH264 and AAC support through fdk-aac-free.
outstanding; it ought support at least everything OIIO supports,
then. thanks much to everyone who made this hap
Hi everyone,
I'm orphaning deltarpm because, as it's currently used in Fedora, it's
not very effective, bugs keep getting opened against it because it's
not working as well as it should (mostly an infra issue as opposed to a
problem with the tool itself), and I no longer have the time or
motivatio
OLD: Fedora-36-20220305.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220306.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:111.71 KiB
Size of
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220305.0):
ID: 1161238 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https:
Lately I haven't had much time to contribute to Fedora packaging and I'm
not using Fedora/EPEL much, so I've decided to orphan all the packages
which I no longer use:
ansible-review
beanstalk-client
bmap-tools
ghc-dbus
ghc-libxml-sax
linenoise
lua-ldap
nodejs-backbone
nodejs-grunt-sed
python-aioht
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220305.0):
ID: 1161222 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
17 matches
Mail list logo
