Re: Question about Fedora Package Naming

Le 19/02/2022 à 13:58, Hirotaka Wakabayashi via devel a écrit : Hello, I have a question about Fedora Package Naming. php-guzzlehttp-guzzle's version is 5.3.4, which is already EOL version by upstream. The latest version is 7.4.1. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-guzzlehttp-guzzle

Re: Need advice on NET_ADMIN capability on a binary (iotop-c)

Hi Boian, On February 20, 2022 12:49:53 AM UTC, Boian Bonev wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA512 > >Hello, > >I have got a pull request [1] that implements installing iotop-c with the >NET_ADMIN capability by default and I am trying to evaluate if that is OK or >not. > >Curren

Re: GNOME (and Cinnamon) issues in Rawhide: status report, including gnome-bluetooth soname issues

On Sun, 2022-02-20 at 00:39 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 16. 02. 22 9:03, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Full version: gnome-shell and mutter 42~beta builds were run yesterday. > > For Fedora 36 they were done in a sidetag, but for Rawhide, no sidetag > > yet existed, so unfortunately they went stra

Re: F37 Change: Make pkexec and pkla-compat optional (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Fri, 2022-02-18 at 13:54 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > sudo is what users/admins use. pkexec is what (desktop) programs often use. In which case we can have the programs that use it depend on it, so at least we have those requirements mapped distinctly. To me it makes more sense to say

Re: Need advice on NET_ADMIN capability on a binary (iotop-c)

On 2/19/22 19:49, Boian Bonev wrote: > Hello, > > I have got a pull request [1] that implements installing iotop-c with the > NET_ADMIN capability by default and I am trying to evaluate if that is OK or > not. > > Currently iotop-c will only allow to be run as root. In case it is run as some > ot

Re: Question about Fedora Package Naming

Hello Neal. Thank you for reply! I will firstly ask to update the main package. I think it's ideal if Fedora users can always use the latest packages and they don't use inactive(EOL?) packages naturally. I don't completely understand the Fedora infra, but I am wondering if a mass rebuild can sk

Re: PSA: GTK-RS 0.15 update coming to F36+

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 9:45 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > I will leave the side tags open until Sunday, two days before the beta > freeze goes into effect. This is now done. The side tags have been merged into rawhide and f36. Please submit further builds directly for rawhide and f36. I have al

Need advice on NET_ADMIN capability on a binary (iotop-c)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello, I have got a pull request [1] that implements installing iotop-c with the NET_ADMIN capability by default and I am trying to evaluate if that is OK or not. Currently iotop-c will only allow to be run as root. In case it is run as some other

Re: GNOME (and Cinnamon) issues in Rawhide: status report, including gnome-bluetooth soname issues

On 16. 02. 22 9:03, Adam Williamson wrote: Full version: gnome-shell and mutter 42~beta builds were run yesterday. For Fedora 36 they were done in a sidetag, but for Rawhide, no sidetag yet existed, so unfortunately they went straight to the main Rawhide tag and were included in yesterday's compo

Re: GNOME (and Cinnamon) issues in Rawhide: status report, including gnome-bluetooth soname issues

Kevin Fenzi wrote: > About a year ago I asked fesco to add > > "In exceptional cases, releng may untag packages." > > https://pagure.io/fesco/fesco-docs/pull-request/40 Well, this is very vague, because nothing defines what an "exceptional case" is. Kevin Kofler ___

Re: F36 Change: DIGLIM (System-Wide Change proposal)

(Secure Boot is concerned only with verifying the trustworthiness of the bootloader. >From https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/kernel_lockdown.7.html: The Kernel Lockdown feature is designed to prevent both direct and indirect access to a running kernel image, attempting to protect against unaut

Re: Preventing account takeovers through expired domains

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > I think it'd be better to check the status weekly and only require > account reconfirmation if the quarantine status is detected ⌊N / 7 - 1⌋ > times in a row (where N=quarantine length in days). It will be fine as long as it's done before the domain is released

Nate158

%global pypi_name HyperKitty %global prerel 1 Name: hyperkitty Version:1.1.5 Release:%{?prerel:0.}1%{?dist} Summary:A web interface to access GNU Mailman v3 archives License:GPLv3 URL:https://gitlab.com/mailman/hyperkitty Source0: http

Re: Preventing .build-id file conflicts between pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 and pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64

On Mon, 2022-02-14 at 11:28 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Mon, 2022-02-14 at 10:34 +0100, Michal Schorm wrote: > > The time had to come, when two packages would generate the same > > hash. > > > > I was hit by: > > --- > > Error: Transaction test error: > >   file /usr/lib/.build-id/34/feaa54946

Fedora-IoT-36-20220219.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220218.0): ID: 1137580 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1137580 ID: 1137581 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostr

Fedora-Rawhide-20220219.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 3 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 35/231 (x86_64), 30/161 (aarch64) New failures (sa

Fedora-36-20220219.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 93/229 (x86_64), 60/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220218.n.0): ID: 1137105 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1137105 ID: 1137106 Test: x86_64 Server-b

Re: Preventing account takeovers through expired domains (was: Do we have any policy for disabling inactive users)

On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 02:18:38PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > Possible step 3: A program on a Fedora Project server notes that > example.net has been deactivated. The program removes the address > j@example.net from J. Doe's account, or disables sending to the > nonexistent address. ... > St

Fedora-IoT-37-20220219.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-37-20220218.0): ID: 1137540 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1137540 ID: 1137541

Preventing account takeovers through expired domains (was: Do we have any policy for disabling inactive users)

Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > We're talking about potentially hacked accounts, right? In this subthread I'm talking about *preventing* account takeovers so that they don't happen in the first place. One specific method of takeover that the Fedora Project would be able to prevent. I thought th

Re: Question about Fedora Package Naming

On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 7:59 AM Hirotaka Wakabayashi via devel wrote: > > Hello, I have a question about Fedora Package Naming. > > php-guzzlehttp-guzzle's version is 5.3.4, which is already EOL version by > upstream. The latest version is 7.4.1. > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-guzzlehtt

Question about Fedora Package Naming

Hello, I have a question about Fedora Package Naming. php-guzzlehttp-guzzle's version is 5.3.4, which is already EOL version by upstream. The latest version is 7.4.1. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-guzzlehttp-guzzlehttps://github.com/guzzle/guzzle#version-guidance In this situation, if I

Fedora 36 compose report: 20220219.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-36-20220218.n.0 NEW: Fedora-36-20220219.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 55 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 21.22 KiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220219.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220218.0): ID: 1137066 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1137066 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220219.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220218.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220219.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 86 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 962.78 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

Fedora-Cloud-35-20220219.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220218.0): ID: 1136645 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op