Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

2022-01-07 Thread Frank Crawford
On Thu, 2022-01-06 at 08:10 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 1/6/22 7:53 AM, Chris Adams wrote: > > ifcfg scripts don't run an RA server.  You can set signaling radvd, > > which can also be done with NM dispatcher scripts (which would be > > much > > more flexible, since it wouldn't be hard-c

[Test-Announce] 2022-01-10 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2022-01-07 Thread Adam Williamson
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2022-01-10 # Time: 16:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat Greetings testers! As quite a lot of folks were still away last week (I missed that in many places the New Year's Day hol

Re: [Discussion] Future of the CLI APP packaging

2022-01-07 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 9:48 PM Jiri Konecny wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I would like to do here a bit of brainstorming and ask if there is an > existing solution to this problem. To explain my problem, > recently I found more and more apps likes terminals, prompt and command > line tooling, which

Re: Self Introduction: Malcolm Inglis (mcinglis)

2022-01-07 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 11:43:15PM +0200, Otto Urpelainen wrote: > > I can give a couple of reasons why just using the packager-sponsors tracker > always would be better. This is from the point of view of somebody who had > to find a sponsor. I am not a sponsor myself, so I do not really know this

Re: Self Introduction: Malcolm Inglis (mcinglis)

2022-01-07 Thread Otto Urpelainen
Kevin Fenzi kirjoitti 7.1.2022 klo 22.05: On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 10:25:50PM +, Inglis, Malcolm via devel wrote: Well, turns out https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors isn't allowing PRs. I've pushed to a branch here with updates and dead-link-fixes for the README: https://pagure.io/fork/mcin

Re: [Discussion] Future of the CLI APP packaging

2022-01-07 Thread Jiri Konecny
Dne 07. 01. 22 v 21:54 Major Hayden napsal(a): On 1/7/22 14:46, Jiri Konecny wrote: I would like to do here a bit of brainstorming and ask if there is an existing solution to this problem. To explain my problem, recently I found more and more apps likes terminals, prompt and command line tool

Re: [Discussion] Future of the CLI APP packaging

2022-01-07 Thread Jiri Konecny
Sorry adding missing link: [0]: https://github.com/starship/starship/blob/master/Cargo.toml#L32 Dne 07. 01. 22 v 21:46 Jiri Konecny napsal(a): Hi everyone, I would like to do here a bit of brainstorming and ask if there is an existing solution to this problem. To explain my problem, recently

Re: [Discussion] Future of the CLI APP packaging

2022-01-07 Thread Major Hayden
On 1/7/22 14:46, Jiri Konecny wrote: I would like to do here a bit of brainstorming and ask if there is an existing solution to this problem. To explain my problem, recently I found more and more apps likes terminals, prompt and command line tooling, which are great to use but not packaged or ar

[Discussion] Future of the CLI APP packaging

2022-01-07 Thread Jiri Konecny
Hi everyone, I would like to do here a bit of brainstorming and ask if there is an existing solution to this problem. To explain my problem, recently I found more and more apps likes terminals, prompt and command line tooling, which are great to use but not packaged or are outdated in our repos

Re: Self Introduction: Malcolm Inglis (mcinglis)

2022-01-07 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 10:25:50PM +, Inglis, Malcolm via devel wrote: > Well, turns out https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors isn't allowing PRs. > > I've pushed to a branch here with updates and dead-link-fixes for the README: > https://pagure.io/fork/mcinglis/packager-sponsors/tree/pr-readme

Maven 3.8.4 update in rawhide

2022-01-07 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
Hello, The maven package in Fedora rawhide will be updated from version 3.6.3 to version 3.8.4 in one week. This update contains API and ABI changes, hence I'm sending this notice in advance per Fedora Updates policy. Kudos to Marian Koncek, who is driving this change. Proposed pull request: htt

Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

2022-01-07 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 1/7/22 2:41 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Would the RA support in systemd-networkd work for your case? I don't know much more about than that various improvements have been done recently with renewing and propagating of the ipv6 routing info, and would be very interested if it's enoug

Re: How do we announce new packages?

2022-01-07 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 10:52:14AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >>Then, the Group 3 person could ... wait, actually. Let's continue this > >>discussion with the Fedora Magazine folks. Please join me over at > >>https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/idea-for-collecting-cool-new-features-cool-new-pac

Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

2022-01-07 Thread Demi Marie Obenour
On 1/7/22 12:27, Steve Grubb wrote: > Hello, > > On Thursday, January 6, 2022 5:20:04 PM EST Demi Marie Obenour wrote:>> Or > could auditctl handle everything itself, perhaps by talking to auditd >> over a socket instead of sending a signal? > > To use a socket or dbus means more attack surface.

Re: F36 Change: PostgreSQL 14 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-01-07 Thread Bruno Wolff III
It looks like qt3, kdb and pgadmin3 still need to be rebuilt after the recent build of postgresql 14.1 in rawhide, because they depend on libpq.so.private13-5()(64bit). ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an emai

F36 Change: New requirements for akmods binary kernel modules for Silverblue / Kinoite support (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-01-07 Thread Ben Cotton
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Binary_Kernel_Modules_rpm-ostree == Summary == In order to improve the current support for akmods based binary kernel modules in Silverblue/Kinoite, this change introduces a new dependency in akmods to a meta package that strongly links the version of a kerne

Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

2022-01-07 Thread Steve Grubb
Hello, On Thursday, January 6, 2022 5:20:04 PM EST Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > It would be better if there was a systemctl solution. Any solution I > > implement will be met with you need to migrate to systemctl. There have > > been multiple bz opened and closed on this. > > What would you need

Re: Orphaning luit

2022-01-07 Thread Thomas Dickey
See my followup on this list, as well as comments in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038135 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: [ELN] Why is rubygem-liquid included in eln?

2022-01-07 Thread Troy Dawson
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 12:20 AM Otto Urpelainen wrote: > I am the maintainer of rubygem-liquid package in Fedora. Every now and > then is receive notification that this package has been built and > updated for eln, for example [1,2]. > > I have been trying to understand why this package is includ

orphaning laby

2022-01-07 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
Hi, it's sad but I need to face the truth: I've no time to work on laby packaging anymore. Following the Orphaning Procedure[1] I'm announcing the orphaning of laby on devel mailing list so that others have a chance to take over as maintainer. Regards, Sandro Bonazzola. [1] https://docs.fedorap

Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

2022-01-07 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 2022-01-06 at 22:17 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Since auditd is started by systemd, you just _have_ to trust systemd. > If control over the manager is lost, the manager can just do anything > it wants, masquerading as any user. So the logging provided by recording > of the d

Re: F36 Change: DIGLIM (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-01-07 Thread Colin Walters
Hi Kevin, On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, at 11:50 AM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > But being allowed to run custom or self-developed software is a core feature > of Free Software. If that stops working in the name of "security", Fedora is > no better than iOS (where Apple also claims the restriction

Re: Self Introduction: XingHong Chen

2022-01-07 Thread Sebastian Crane
> I'm Xinghong from the Intel NPG-QAT team. I'm very interested in > becoming a Fedora package Co-maintainer. My responsibility is to > upgrade and maintain the "QATzip" package. Welcome! Speedy compression and decompression is always nice, so thanks for your work on this. Best wishes, Sebastian

Re: unretire luit and vttest

2022-01-07 Thread Thomas Dickey
I did that - see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2038144 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038135 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: unretire luit and vttest

2022-01-07 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 07/01/2022 13:30, Thomas Dickey wrote: Since they're easy to build, I'd like to take over packaging them for Fedora: You should open a new review requests against these packages as described here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/#claiming

Re: Mock v2.16 release, mock-core-configs v36.4

2022-01-07 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 07. 01. 22 v 12:30 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): On 07. 01. 22 12:18, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 06. 01. 22 v 20:05 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): On 06. 01. 22 18:29, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 12:01 PM David Cantrell wrote: On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 05:26:26PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:

unretire luit and vttest

2022-01-07 Thread Thomas Dickey
I'm the upstream developer and maintainer for several applications (used in most Linux and BSD distributions)., and was reminded that a few of these were dropped from Fedora last year. Since they're easy to build, I'd like to take over packaging them for Fedora: * luit - https://invisible-isla

Re: python-lxml license change

2022-01-07 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 3:03 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > License of python-lxml package was changed from "BSD" to "BSD and MIT and > zlib" The license change happened in rawhide in June 2021. Currently there are pending updates introducing the same license change to Fedora 34 and Fedora 35. -

Re: Mock v2.16 release, mock-core-configs v36.4

2022-01-07 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 07. 01. 22 12:18, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 06. 01. 22 v 20:05 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): On 06. 01. 22 18:29, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 12:01 PM David Cantrell wrote: On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 05:26:26PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote: Also note that I for one have never used 'fedpk

Re: Mock v2.16 release, mock-core-configs v36.4

2022-01-07 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 06. 01. 22 v 20:05 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): On 06. 01. 22 18:29, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 12:01 PM David Cantrell wrote: On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 05:26:26PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote: Also note that I for one have never used 'fedpkg mockbuild' for real.  I use plain mock.

Re: How do we announce new packages?

2022-01-07 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 06. 01. 22 v 19:38 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 12:40 AM Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 08:28:08PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: So ... something like: - create a ticketing system for idea / text submissions (project with issue tracker on pagure?) - th

Re: Self Introduction: Luna Jernberg

2022-01-07 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 21:48:15 +0100, Luna Jernberg wrote: > Hey! > > i just recognized and remembered i never sent an introduction to the devel > list > for Fedora > > I am Luna Jernberg 31 year old non binary person Hi Luna, Welcome! See you around in the channels :) -- Thanks, Regards, Ank

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220107.0 compose check report

2022-01-07 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220106.0): ID: 1098474 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

RE: F36 Change: DIGLIM (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-01-07 Thread Roberto Sassu via devel
> From: Chris Murphy [mailto:li...@colorremedies.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 6, 2022 9:34 PM > Could this feature work with 3rd party kernel modules, in a UEFI > Secure Boot (and thus kernel lockdown) context? It could be possible to create a digest list of third-party kernel modules. However,

Fedora-Cloud-35-20220107.0 compose check report

2022-01-07 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220106.0): ID: 1098458 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

2022-01-07 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 07:43:18AM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 1/5/22 5:21 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > >I am, however, curious what functionality exists in network-scripts > >that doesn't in NetworkManager, since most of the newer networking > >features were only implemented in ifcfg-rh on N

[ELN] Why is rubygem-liquid included in eln?

2022-01-07 Thread Otto Urpelainen
I am the maintainer of rubygem-liquid package in Fedora. Every now and then is receive notification that this package has been built and updated for eln, for example [1,2]. I have been trying to understand why this package is included in eln. As far as I can understand, it should be somehow vi