Re: New tool - license-validate

Tell me when you get the rpm up so I can add it: https://release-monitoring.org/project/226644/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://do

Re: New tool - license-validate

Dne 27. 12. 21 v 0:44 Neal Gompa napsal(a): I would suggest holding off on that, as we are working on updating the guidelines to use SPDX identifiers (and therefore SPDX expressions). Any ETA? SPDX expression logic is identical to Fedora's, so that will not change. The identifiers will be chan

Rawhide builds failing for a while now

What exactly is wrong? https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?state=3&order=-build_id ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fe

Re: The great Mailman 3 / Hyperkitty upgrade: bumping flufl-lock and mistune?

Update? https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8455 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/co

Re: New tool - license-validate

Dec 26, 2021 4:46:12 PM Matthew Miller : > I would suggest holding off on that, as we are working on updating the > guidelines to use SPDX identifiers (and therefore SPDX expressions). I'm happy that we're moving in this direction. It's confusing to have two different sets of license identifiers

Re: New tool - license-validate

On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 4:46 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 10:08:24PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > My next goal will be to download all Fedora's spec files, extract > > the license line and run it through this script. But I am going to > > be few days offline, so anyone

Re: New tool - license-validate

On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 10:08:24PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > My next goal will be to download all Fedora's spec files, extract > the license line and run it through this script. But I am going to > be few days offline, so anyone who want step in QE shoes can do that > - I will not be mad :) I

New tool - license-validate

Hi. I have created new tool license-validate https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/ And I packaged it for Fedora. Here is the review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035680 The goal of this tool is to validate the string in the License tag in the spec file. I.e.   LIc

Re: Fix for python-tzlocal FTBFS

On Sun, 26 Dec 2021, Barry Scott wrote: On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 5:16 AM Barry Scott wrote: I have added a patch for the spec file for python-tzlocal.spec that allows the 4.1 release to build. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993583 I can raise a PR if

Re: How do we announce new packages?

On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 2:02 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > Fedora Magazine semi-regularly runs "cool new projects in Copr" articles > (https://fedoramagazine.org/?s=copr). It doesn't seem like too much of > stretch to occasionally also have "cool new packages in the distro" article > occasionally. >

Re: How do we announce new packages?

On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 09:15:38PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > So ... maybe we could have a mailing list for this? > > Maybe "awesome-announce" or "the-new-shinyness" (I'm kidding! I'm bad > with names!) at lists.fedoraproject.org, where all Fedora contributors > could post the fancy new thing

Re: Fix for python-tzlocal FTBFS

> On 22 Dec 2021, at 21:46, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 5:16 AM Barry Scott > wrote: > I have added a patch for the spec file for python-tzlocal.spec > that allows the 4.1 release to build. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993

Re: How do we announce new packages?

On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 11:37:10PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > The Fedora Community Blog and the Fedora Magazine > are obvious places to look for such info, which target > different communities. > > In both cases, it would seem some with strong > writing and editorial skills (and time, which i

Re: Advise needed: guideline for very big data rpms?

On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 04:21:04PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > The project could offer 18 language files for a voice recognition > > > system, which is ( unpacked ) up to 2.4 GB each and packed upto around > > > 1.6~1.8 GB each. + 18 small ones ~50-60 MB each. [...] > But it's totally fine to sh

Orphaning perl-Net-HL7

I'm orphaning the package perl-Net-HL7 as I've not used it a long time. Upstream is pretty much static, it hasn't seen an update in a long time. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fe

Non-responsive maintainer - rlandmann

In accordance with the Fedora non-responsive maintainer policy, I am attempting to contact Rüdiger Landmann a.k.a. rlandmann. Does anyone know how to contact this package maintainer? This is in reference to perl-XML-TreeBuilder: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977273 Non-responsive

Re: How do we announce new packages?

Il 22/12/21 14:49, Petr Menšík ha scritto: > > If newpackage is chosen in Bodhi update, it can be listed from it: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search=&releases=__current__&releases=__pending__&type=newpackage&page=1 > > Slight problem is rawhide only builds do not have newpackage up

RE: F36 Change: DIGLIM (System-Wide Change proposal)

> From: Dan Čermák [mailto:dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com] > Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2021 7:10 AM > Ben Cotton writes: > > *snip* > > > > > It will also make Fedora able to detect tampering of its components at > > a more privileged level, the kernel, without the interference of user > > spac

Fedora-Cloud-34-20211226.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211225.0): ID: 1091455 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Fedora-Cloud-35-20211226.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211224.0): ID: 1091439 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op