Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for bpepple

2021-12-23 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 01:32:14PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Fri, 17 Dec 2021, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > Does anyone know how to contact them? Direct email and bug reports have > > > had no response. > > > > His twitter profile points at a few contact options as a last resort. > > h

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers​​​

2021-12-23 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 02:35:56PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > ocaml-atdorphan1 weeks ago Mea culpa, this is one that slips through the crack while I was on parental leave. I've reclaimed it (and the associated bug) - it's a dependency of Infer

Re: Games group?

2021-12-23 Thread Reon Beon via devel
> Dear Reon, > > Could you please provide just a little bit more context in you emails? > > Sometimes, I appreciate this game where one have to gather several more > bits and pieces to understand what one want to say and this might be > especially entertaining in smaller group which has some tr

Re: Games group?

2021-12-23 Thread Reon Beon via devel
> Dear Reon, > > Could you please provide just a little bit more context in you emails? > > Sometimes, I appreciate this game where one have to gather several more > bits and pieces to understand what one want to say and this might be > especially entertaining in smaller group which has some tr

Re: F36 Change: GHC compiler parallel version installs (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-23 Thread Tom Stellard
On 12/13/21 08:56, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GHC_parallel_version_installs == Summary == Introduce ghcX.Y packages to Fedora which can be parallel installed, in addition to the main ghc package. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Petersen|Jens Petersen]] * Email: peter..

Upcoming downtime for Fedora Discussion (~ Dec 27-Jan 1)

2021-12-23 Thread Matthew Miller
Almost three years ago, we moved the existing Ask Fedora site from an engine which attempted to replicate Stack Exchange to a new system (the current [Ask Fedora]) based on [Discourse], a modern open source web forum platform. We had some frustrations with the software, and the Stack-Exchange-like

Re: Review requests: 4x python-flask-* packages

2021-12-23 Thread Ben Beasley
I will review these. – Ben On 12/23/21 05:54, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi I have the following packages pending review: python-flask-gravatar - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033804 python-flask-paranoid - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2033803 python-flask-prin

Re: Package wishlist site?

2021-12-23 Thread Jerry James
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 10:41 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > > 3. I want to become a Fedora packager but I don't work on an upstream > >project that is not already in the Fedora repositories. > > 4. I am bored and feeling altruistic > > Yeah, I'd love to try to encourage these things. So _maybe_ t

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers​​​

2021-12-23 Thread Sumit Garg
Hello Pavel, I am good with co-maintaining of pluntuml. I have raised my sponsorship ticket #508. Regards Sumit > On 23-Dec-2021, at 8:30 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > Hello Sumit, Blaise, > > you both seem to be interested in maintaining plantuml, I believe you > could co-maintain that pack

Re: Package wishlist site?

2021-12-23 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 12:47:01AM +0100, Jakub Kadlčík wrote: > I haven't seen almost any distribution having a package wishlist so it > is either a bad idea (and doesn't have any real value) or everybody > else missed a good opportunity. Or possibly they (maybe even Fedora) > have it, but it is n

Re: Fix for python-tzlocal FTBFS

2021-12-23 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 12/22/21 03:12, Barry Scott wrote: I can raise a PR if that helps, but I have not done that before so pointers to the work flow would be welcomed. https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/quickstart/github-flow The workflow is largely similar to other Git interfaces, such as GitHub.  From h

Re: Games group?

2021-12-23 Thread Reon Beon via devel
I was just seeing if other people were interested in a gaming group and just found out there is one. See: the games list on fedora. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.or

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers​​​

2021-12-23 Thread Pavel Raiskup
Hello Sumit, Blaise, you both seem to be interested in maintaining plantuml, I believe you could co-maintain that package together? We use the package in our team to automatically generate some diagrams, so it would be awesome if you could take care it. Per docs [1] I think you should go to the

Orphaning rubygem-rsolr

2021-12-23 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi, I don't have any use for rubygem-rsolr, therefore I have orphaned the package. Vít OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@li

Re: PyQt6 for fedora status?

2021-12-23 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 5:56 AM Sandro Mani wrote: > > Hi > > If you decide to package it, I'd be happy to review it, and I'd like to > package the mingw counterpart. > > Sandro > > On 22.12.21 12:20, Barry Scott wrote: > > I see that there are packages for qt6, but no python-qt6 yet. > > > > What

Re: I quit packaging

2021-12-23 Thread Volker Fröhlich
Let me hand them over to you! Volker Am 22.12.21 um 16:07 schrieb Ben Beasley: I have taken freexl. I am willing to take pyshp, python-OWSLib, and readosm, but they have not been orphaned. Co-maintainers are (always) welcome. - Ben Beasley (FAS music) On 12/12/21 17:18, Emmanuel Seyman wrot

Re: PyQt6 for fedora status?

2021-12-23 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi If you decide to package it, I'd be happy to review it, and I'd like to package the mingw counterpart. Sandro On 22.12.21 12:20, Barry Scott wrote: I see that there are packages for qt6, but no python-qt6 yet. What is the plan for this please? I have built PyQt5 in the past and, time pe

Review requests: 4x python-flask-* packages

2021-12-23 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi I have the following packages pending review: python-flask-gravatar - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033804 python-flask-paranoid - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2033803 python-flask-principal - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203380

(Not) Bundling Javascript for a Python package?

2021-12-23 Thread Viliam Križan
Hello, I have this python-djangoql [1] package that I've maintain. The upstream has decided to split the JavaScript code to a separate repository [2] available also on NPM as djangoql-completion [3]. However they bundle the JS in their Python package [4] as a minified JS file. According to Jav

Re: Package wishlist site?

2021-12-23 Thread Vít Ondruch
There used to be Wishlist on Ruby SIG page, but I have remove it [1] for several reasons: 1) It was not maintained, only occasionally somebody added something 2) Nobody really looked at it. And also, one thing is to add package into Fedora, but maintain it long term is completely different is

Fedora-Cloud-34-20211223.0 compose check report

2021-12-23 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211221.0): ID: 1090992 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: Games group?

2021-12-23 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dear Reon, Could you please provide just a little bit more context in you emails? Sometimes, I appreciate this game where one have to gather several more bits and pieces to understand what one want to say and this might be especially entertaining in smaller group which has some tribal knowled

Re: F36 Change: %set_build_flags for %build and %check (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-12-23 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 22. 12. 21 v 18:44 Tom Stellard napsal(a): On 12/22/21 01:56, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 21. 12. 21 v 21:56 Tom Stellard napsal(a): On 12/21/21 01:42, Vít Ondruch wrote: Hi Tom, Since you are digging into this and AFAIK you are involved with toolchains, this reminds me this dreaded issue:

Fedora-Cloud-35-20211223.0 compose check report

2021-12-23 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211222.0): ID: 1090976 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op