On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 11:15 PM Reon Beon via devel
wrote:
>
> Thoughts?
No. Kate is more complex and confusing. KWrite was introduced as a
deliberately simpler text editor, which is why we ship it by default
instead of Kate. Kate is *built* on KWrite and extends it with lots of
programmer-speci
Hello,
I am new to this group and not yet part of the Packager group. I would like to
contribute in maintaining of orphan package plantuml, if I am allowed to do so.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email t
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ga...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/6MY3KDQ3GQBVDULLOHOWMN7AAK2VLQ6V/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
I have proposed a python-colored-traceback package at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033730
Would anyone like to do a review swap?
I am anxious to get python-colored-traceback reviewed, because the
existing python-pwntools package will require python-colored-traceback
with
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 11:00 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> So will the default version be the "ghc" package going forward?
That's correct - general Haskell users/consumers should just continue to
use the main ghc package and ghc-* libraries.
ghcX.Y is for people who need/want to use or test differen
Thoughts?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedorapro
Hello,
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for halfie. I have filed a bug for
epel8/9 branch[1] and one for non-responsive maintainer[2].
Does anyone know how to contact halfie?
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030902
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=203514
There's been a (short) discussion about having a wishlist last month:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/K3O5WRMT75UCWMRE6PCMBHRGMHMIBM63/
A.FI.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To un
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 11:56 PM Jakub Kadlčík wrote:
> TL;DR What about a place where people could ask for something to be
> packaged in Fedora?
There is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists
Hello,
TL;DR What about a place where people could ask for something to be
packaged in Fedora?
I haven't seen almost any distribution having a package wishlist so it
is either a bad idea (and doesn't have any real value) or everybody
else missed a good opportunity. Or possibly they (maybe even Fe
On 22. 12. 21 18:44, Tom Stellard wrote:
I wasn't suggesting modifying the extension flags directly. What I meant was
that we should be able to specify a set of flags for extensions to use
when we build python, for example. And then extensions would pick up those
flags up the same way they do
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 5:16 AM Barry Scott wrote:
> I have added a patch for the spec file for python-tzlocal.spec
> that allows the 4.1 release to build.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993583
>
> I can raise a PR if that helps, but I have not done that before
> so pointers to
On 12/22/21 01:56, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 21. 12. 21 v 21:56 Tom Stellard napsal(a):
On 12/21/21 01:42, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi Tom,
Since you are digging into this and AFAIK you are involved with toolchains,
this reminds me this dreaded issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284
On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 4:22:29 PM CET Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:14 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 9:36:01 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 5:49:34 PM CET Maxwell G wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, December 21,
There are the "Fedora rawhide compose report" email coming (almost)
daily into this ML, which contains list of added packages. Nevertheless,
the "Changes" [1] process is the main way to announce and increase
visibility of the new features which goes to Fedora.
Vít
[1] https://docs.fedorapro
Yes, this can't be updated until someone packages ROCM-Device-Libs
unfortunately.
If anyone volunteers, I'm happy to help review.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:14 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 9:36:01 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 5:49:34 PM CET Maxwell G wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 8:22:55 AM CST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > > On 19. 12. 21 22:39, Pavel
I have taken freexl.
I am willing to take pyshp, python-OWSLib, and readosm, but they have
not been orphaned.
Co-maintainers are (always) welcome.
- Ben Beasley (FAS music)
On 12/12/21 17:18, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Volker Fröhlich [12/12/2021 23:03] :
All of my packages are up for grabs
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 2:38 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GHC_parallel_version_installs
>
>
> == Summary ==
> Introduce ghcX.Y packages to Fedora which can be parallel installed,
> in addition to the main ghc package.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:Petersen|Jen
Hi Barry,
I'm an aspiring Fedora packager with a focus on python. I'm likely to run
into the same situation soon. If you don't get any traction on this, I am
happy to look around and see if I can find some useful examples.
I'm in eastern time zone if you want to have a second pair of eyes.
Cheer
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20211212.1):
ID: 1090534 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1090534
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests comple
If newpackage is chosen in Bodhi update, it can be listed from it:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search=&releases=__current__&releases=__pending__&type=newpackage&page=1
Slight problem is rawhide only builds do not have newpackage updates in
bodhi. I think they do not have any good pla
Le 21/12/2021 à 15:47, Remi Collet a écrit :
Hi,
Pavel is non responsive for a while
Already managed 4 years ago
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1758
I've been maintaining for a while
- php-pecl-gmagick
- php-pecl-imagick
- php-pecl-xmldiff
Do you I need to follow the full workflow,
or a fesc
Hello people.
First of all, I'm not a developer or a packager, I just try to help with
the little things I know to do. One thing I try to do is to check news,
forums, ML and places where people talk about Fedora.
A thing I noted is that a lot of people in magazines and news sites like
phoronix,
> On 22 Dec 2021, at 11:12, Barry Scott wrote:
>
> I have added a patch for the spec file for python-tzlocal.spec
> that allows the 4.1 release to build.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993583
>
> I can raise a PR if that helps, but I have not done that before
> so pointers t
On ke, 22 joulu 2021, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On ke, 22 joulu 2021, Mat Booth wrote:
On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 at 14:35, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
I picked up wsdl4j to prevent actions which would lead to tomcat, Dogtag, and
FreeIPA being orphaned over Christmas break.
Have you tried building to
Hi,
for a new project hopefully coming to soon to Fedora, I like to know
the policy for really big data rpms.
The project could offer 18 language files for a voice recognition
system, which is ( unpacked ) up to 2.4 GB each and packed upto around
1.6~1.8 GB each.
+ 18 small ones ~50-60 MB
I see that there are packages for qt6, but no python-qt6 yet.
What is the plan for this please?
I have built PyQt5 in the past and, time permitting, can
offer help.
Barry
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an em
I have added a patch for the spec file for python-tzlocal.spec
that allows the 4.1 release to build.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993583
I can raise a PR if that helps, but I have not done that before
so pointers to the work flow would be welcomed.
I need the 4.1 version for one
Dne 21. 12. 21 v 21:56 Tom Stellard napsal(a):
On 12/21/21 01:42, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi Tom,
Since you are digging into this and AFAIK you are involved with
toolchains, this reminds me this dreaded issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284684
In short, various languages, such
On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 9:36:01 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 5:49:34 PM CET Maxwell G wrote:
> > On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 8:22:55 AM CST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 19. 12. 21 22:39, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, December 19, 2021 10:22:57 PM C
On ke, 22 joulu 2021, Mat Booth wrote:
On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 at 14:35, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
I picked up wsdl4j to prevent actions which would lead to tomcat, Dogtag, and
FreeIPA being orphaned over Christmas break.
Have you tried building tomcat without wsdl? I can't see where in the
tomc
On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 at 14:35, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>
> I picked up wsdl4j to prevent actions which would lead to tomcat, Dogtag, and
> FreeIPA being orphaned over Christmas break.
>
Have you tried building tomcat without wsdl? I can't see where in the
tomcat source it is used. Is it really a
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211221.0):
ID: 1090365 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 5:49:34 PM CET Maxwell G wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 8:22:55 AM CST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 19. 12. 21 22:39, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > On Sunday, December 19, 2021 10:22:57 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > >> So it seems that fedpkg doesn't (yet) know th
35 matches
Mail list logo
