I am orphaning the following packages that contain a NodeJS “production”
dependency bundle:
- fkill-cli
- fx (along with fx-completion, which depends on it)
- nodejs-svgo
- npm-name-cli
- topojson-client
- topojson-server
- topojson-simplify
Considering recent and ongoing discussion over the vi
On 12/21/21 01:42, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi Tom,
Since you are digging into this and AFAIK you are involved with toolchains,
this reminds me this dreaded issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284684
In short, various languages, such as Ruby embeds the build time options and
reuse
Hi all,
Let it be known that starting with version 0.5.5 of the rust-num_enum
and rust-num_enum_derive packages, their license will be "BSD or MIT
or ASL 2.0", whereas it was just "BSD" before. Since this change just
adds more choices, I do not expect it to cause problems.
Fabio
_
On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 8:22:55 AM CST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 19. 12. 21 22:39, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Sunday, December 19, 2021 10:22:57 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >> So it seems that fedpkg doesn't (yet) know there's ~/.config/mock* at all.
> >
> > Proposed fix: https://pagure.io/
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 8:45 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 8:04 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > capnproto 0.9.1 has been pushed into Rawhide, and with it, a soname
> > bump from 0.8.0 to 0.9.1 has occurred.
> >
> > Based on the repoquery, only three packages are d
Dne 21. 12. 21 v 16:33 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden napsal(a):
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 02:47:10PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 21. 12. 21 v 13:13 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden napsal(a):
Thanks for that. It looks like Fedora 32 added the new
%sysusers_create_compat macro. That means the guidelines
Hello folks,
as I previously announced [1] in the astronomy mailing list, I've
decided to orphan Siril and focus my spare time on other things, as I'm
already only using the flatpak provided by Flathub (which comes with all
the codecs needed to get all program functionalities).
If anyone is inter
Remi Collet wrote on 2021/12/21 23:42:
Hi,
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for kaigai
I've been maintaining php-pecl-selinux for a while
and I've also taken upstream lead developement for it
See https://pecl.php.net/package/selinux
Filed a bug for EPEL-9 branch
https://bugzilla.redha
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 02:47:10PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 21. 12. 21 v 13:13 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden napsal(a):
Thanks for that. It looks like Fedora 32 added the new
%sysusers_create_compat macro. That means the guidelines apply to
all supported Fedora versions but not to EL7 & EL8.
On ti, 21 joulu 2021, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 21. 12. 21 15:33, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
wsdl4j akurtakov, mizdebsk, orphan 2 weeks ago
I picked up wsdl4j to prevent actions which would lead to tomcat, Dogtag, and
FreeIPA being orphaned over Christmas break.
Th
Hi,
Pavel is non responsive for a while
Already managed 4 years ago
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1758
I've been maintaining for a while
- php-pecl-gmagick
- php-pecl-imagick
- php-pecl-xmldiff
Do you I need to follow the full workflow,
or a fesco ticket is enough ?
Regards,
Remi
___
I've taken libgda.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en
On 21. 12. 21 15:33, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
wsdl4j akurtakov, mizdebsk, orphan 2 weeks ago
I picked up wsdl4j to prevent actions which would lead to tomcat, Dogtag, and
FreeIPA being orphaned over Christmas break.
There was no orphaning going to happen over t
Hi,
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for kaigai
I've been maintaining php-pecl-selinux for a while
and I've also taken upstream lead developement for it
See https://pecl.php.net/package/selinux
Filed a bug for EPEL-9 branch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030545
Filed a b
On ti, 21 joulu 2021, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to
On 19. 12. 21 22:39, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
On Sunday, December 19, 2021 10:22:57 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
So it seems that fedpkg doesn't (yet) know there's ~/.config/mock* at all.
Proposed fix: https://pagure.io/rpkg/pull-request/595
It seems that this would only fix the issue if the symb
Dne 21. 12. 21 v 13:13 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden napsal(a):
Thanks for that. It looks like Fedora 32 added the new
%sysusers_create_compat macro. That means the guidelines apply to all
supported Fedora versions but not to EL7 & EL8. Is this something that
would normally be noted in the docs or
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 8:04 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> capnproto 0.9.1 has been pushed into Rawhide, and with it, a soname
> bump from 0.8.0 to 0.9.1 has occurred.
>
> Based on the repoquery, only three packages are dependent on it:
>
> * mir (drops dependency with 2.6.0 update I'm wor
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
Hey all,
capnproto 0.9.1 has been pushed into Rawhide, and with it, a soname
bump from 0.8.0 to 0.9.1 has occurred.
Based on the repoquery, only three packages are dependent on it:
* mir (drops dependency with 2.6.0 update I'm working on)
* rr
* sonic-visualiser
I'm taking care of the rebuilds
Thanks for that. It looks like Fedora 32 added the new
%sysusers_create_compat macro. That means the guidelines apply to all
supported Fedora versions but not to EL7 & EL8. Is this something that
would normally be noted in the docs or are the docs intended as purely
Fedora? As a packager I feel
Dne 21. 12. 21 v 11:01 Florian Weimer napsal(a):
* Vít Ondruch:
Since you are digging into this and AFAIK you are involved with
toolchains, this reminds me this dreaded issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284684
In short, various languages, such as Ruby embeds the build time
I don't have direct answer to your question, but if I wanted to have an
answer to this question, I'd try to go back in history, so this would be
my start:
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/history/guidelines/modules/ROOT/pages/UsersAndGroups.adoc
And this is the place where the guidelines
* Vít Ondruch:
> Since you are digging into this and AFAIK you are involved with
> toolchains, this reminds me this dreaded issue:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284684
>
> In short, various languages, such as Ruby embeds the build time
> options and reuse them for build of exten
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211220.0):
ID: 1090222 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hi Tom,
Since you are digging into this and AFAIK you are involved with
toolchains, this reminds me this dreaded issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284684
In short, various languages, such as Ruby embeds the build time options
and reuse them for build of extensions. And I wo
On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 12:35 PM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 9:35 AM Alejandro Saez Morollon
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:14 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Will there be a separate go 1.18 mass rebuild in rawhide?
> >> Or will the f36 mass rebui
On 12/9/21 10:12 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 09/12/2021 14:17, Sandro Mani wrote:
>> Is this in any way acceptable?
>
> All packages must be built completely from sources.
>
>> Is this compatible with
>
> You must remove all pre-built artifacts and minified sources before
> creatin
On 12/18/21 3:04 AM, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> On Thursday, 16 December 2021 23:59:23 CET Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> On 12/10/21 6:56 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>>> On 10.12.21 01:54, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
On 12/9/21 1:05 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> On 09.12.21 17:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via de
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211220.0):
ID: 1090206 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
30 matches
Mail list logo
