Re: debug_package when using go_generate_buildrequires

On 12/20/21 8:09 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > Having to disable debug packages practically always indicates a bug in > the package - either packaging, upstream or both. > > Typical causes for "error: Empty %files file > <...>/debugsourcefiles.list" are missing debug info in the build (eg -g > f

Re: F36 Change: %set_build_flags for %build and %check (System-Wide Change proposal)

* Tom Stellard: > What do you think the best place is to document this? > I was thinking in the Packaging Guidelines: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_compiler_flags Please update the in-place package documentation (buildflags.md) at the very least. Thanks, Florian

Re: F36 Change: %set_build_flags for %build and %check (System-Wide Change proposal)

* Miro Hrončok: > On 20. 12. 21 21:39, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Ben Cotton: >> >>> This change will be implemented by updating the %__spec_build_pre and >>> %__speck_check_pre macros in redhat-rpm-config to include >>> %set_build_flags. This will set these environment variables >>> automatical

Re: F36 Change: %set_build_flags for %build and %check (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 12/20/21 14:04, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 20. 12. 21 21:39, Florian Weimer wrote: * Ben Cotton: This change will be implemented by updating the %__spec_build_pre and %__speck_check_pre macros in redhat-rpm-config to include %set_build_flags.  This will set these environment variables automatic

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for Eric Smith (brouhaha)

On 20. 12. 21 22:44, Felix Schwarz wrote: Am 20.12.21 um 12:49 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski: This is a non-responsive maintainer check for Eric Smith (brouhaha). I've been maintaining solaar for over two years now. It was maintained by tibbs before. I asked the original maintainer, E

Re: F36 Change: %set_build_flags for %build and %check (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 20. 12. 21 21:39, Florian Weimer wrote: * Ben Cotton: This change will be implemented by updating the %__spec_build_pre and %__speck_check_pre macros in redhat-rpm-config to include %set_build_flags. This will set these environment variables automatically before the %build and %check sectio

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for Eric Smith (brouhaha)

Am 20.12.21 um 12:49 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski: This is a non-responsive maintainer check for Eric Smith (brouhaha). I've been maintaining solaar for over two years now. It was maintained by tibbs before. I asked the original maintainer, Eric Smith to change the default bugzilla as

Re: F36 Change: %set_build_flags for %build and %check (System-Wide Change proposal)

* Ben Cotton: > This change will be implemented by updating the %__spec_build_pre and > %__speck_check_pre macros in redhat-rpm-config to include > %set_build_flags. This will set these environment variables > automatically before the %build and %check sections. See the proposed > [https://src.f

Re: Unable to login as root with a recent Rawhide Fedora Cloud image

On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 7:36 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2021-12-20 at 09:35 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2021-12-20 at 10:43 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 10:31, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > When I set up a rawh

Re: F36 Change: %set_build_flags for %build and %check (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 12/20/21 10:17, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 20. 12. 21 18:41, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SetBuildFlagsBuildCheck == Summary == Call %set_build_flags macro automatically at the beginning of the %build and %check phases of RPM builds in Fedora Linux.  This will ensure

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2021-12-20)

The meeting was cancelled because we didn't have quorum. The next meeting will be on the 3rd. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: htt

Re: Unable to login as root with a recent Rawhide Fedora Cloud image

On Mon, 2021-12-20 at 09:35 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2021-12-20 at 10:43 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 10:31, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > When I set up a rawhide cloud image > > > (Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20211217.n.1.x86_64

Re: F36 Change: %set_build_flags for %build and %check (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 20. 12. 21 18:41, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SetBuildFlagsBuildCheck == Summary == Call %set_build_flags macro automatically at the beginning of the %build and %check phases of RPM builds in Fedora Linux. This will ensure that the compiler flag environment varia

F36 Change: Ruby 3.1 (System-Wide Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_3.1 == Summary == Ruby 3.1 is the latest stable version of Ruby. Many new features and improvements are included for the increasingly diverse and expanding demands for Ruby. With this major update from Ruby 3.0 in Fedora 35 to Ruby 3.1 in Fedora 36, Fedo

F36 Change: %set_build_flags for %build and %check (System-Wide Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SetBuildFlagsBuildCheck == Summary == Call %set_build_flags macro automatically at the beginning of the %build and %check phases of RPM builds in Fedora Linux. This will ensure that the compiler flag environment variables are set for every RPM build. == Ow

F36 Change: LLVM 14 (System-Wide Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LLVM-14 == Summary == Update all llvm sub-projects in Fedora Linux to version 14. == Owner == * Name: [[User:tstellar| Tom Stellard]] * Email: == Detailed Description == All llvm sub-projects in Fedora will be updated to version 14, and there will be a s

Re: Unable to login as root with a recent Rawhide Fedora Cloud image

On Mon, 2021-12-20 at 10:43 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 10:31, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > When I set up a rawhide cloud image > > (Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20211217.n.1.x86_64.qcow2 from > > download.fedoraproject.org) with a root password using v

Re: F36 Change: Make Authselect Mandatory (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Tue, Oct 12, 2021, at 11:32 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Make_Authselect_Mandatory Just to raise the visibility here, this currently breaks all ostree-based systems (*again*): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019052#c1 __

Re: Unable to login as root with a recent Rawhide Fedora Cloud image

On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 10:31, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > > Hi, > > When I set up a rawhide cloud image > (Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20211217.n.1.x86_64.qcow2 from > download.fedoraproject.org) with a root password using virt-sysprep: > > virt-sysprep -a --root-password password:123456 > --selin

Re: About how Go is updated in Fedora

On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 10:16, Colin Walters wrote: > > > > On Sat, Dec 18, 2021, at 5:06 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > Sure, I saw that ticket. But I fail to see how this is this a "new problem". > > If you use, for example, some shiny, new features that are only going > > to be in GCC 12 or

Unable to login as root with a recent Rawhide Fedora Cloud image

Hi, When I set up a rawhide cloud image (Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20211217.n.1.x86_64.qcow2 from download.fedoraproject.org) with a root password using virt-sysprep: virt-sysprep -a --root-password password:123456 --selinux-relabel [...] ...I am unable to login as root on the console once

Re: About how Go is updated in Fedora

On Sat, Dec 18, 2021, at 5:06 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Sure, I saw that ticket. But I fail to see how this is this a "new problem". > If you use, for example, some shiny, new features that are only going > to be in GCC 12 or LLVM 14, There's a *big* difference between Go and C/C++/Rust t

Creating users/groups in RPMs with EL7 compatibility

Hello everyone, I'm looking at modernizing the upstream Jenkins RPM packaging and reading through the packaging guidelines[1]. I see some decent macros but these are incompatible with EL7. What would be the recommendation for RPM specs that should work on EL7 and newer? Regards, Ewoud Kohl v

Rust Stack Spring Cleaning (in Winter)

Hello Rust packagers, (I'm sending this email to the devel and rust lists, and I've added all directly affected package maintainers in Bcc - because adding them all to the "To" or "CC" fields would make the lists reject this message, I believe.) I have been working on and preparing some more clea

Re: debug_package when using go_generate_buildrequires

On 12/20/21 16:02, Bob Mauchin wrote: On Mon, 20 Dec 2021, 14:09 Panu Matilainen, > wrote: On 12/20/21 01:39, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > On 12/6/21 12:42, Mikel Olasagasti wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I was updating some golang specs I've and

Re: debug_package when using go_generate_buildrequires

On Mon, 20 Dec 2021, 14:09 Panu Matilainen, wrote: > On 12/20/21 01:39, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > On 12/6/21 12:42, Mikel Olasagasti wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I was updating some golang specs I've and switching them to use > >> go_generate_buildrequires. > >> > >> I realized that some s

Re: Non-responsive Maintainer Check for ishcherb

On 19. 12. 21 19:03, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 19. 12. 21 18:26, Maxwell G via devel wrote: Hi everyone, I hope you are having/had a good weekend. I am sending this email in accordance with the Non-Responsive Maintainer Policy[0]. I created a non-responsive maintainer bug[1] for @ishcherb over

Re: debug_package when using go_generate_buildrequires

On 12/20/21 01:39, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: On 12/6/21 12:42, Mikel Olasagasti wrote: Hi all, I was updating some golang specs I've and switching them to use go_generate_buildrequires. I realized that some specs that are using it fail to build if `%global debug_package %{nil}` is not set. S

Non-responsive maintainer check for Eric Smith (brouhaha)

Hi, This is a non-responsive maintainer check for Eric Smith (brouhaha). I've been maintaining solaar for over two years now. It was maintained by tibbs before. I asked the original maintainer, Eric Smith to change the default bugzilla assignee to myself several times in the past. The last time w

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2021-12-20)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-12-20 19:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be dis

Fedora-Cloud-34-20211220.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211219.0): ID: 1089908 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Fedora-Cloud-35-20211220.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211219.0): ID: 1089892 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op