> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailman3_Migration
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailman3_Migration/Status
As an added point, there would be nice to be added here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailman3_Migration
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailman3_Migration/Status
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Thursday, 16 December 2021 23:59:23 CET Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 12/10/21 6:56 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > On 10.12.21 01:54, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> >> On 12/9/21 1:05 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >>> On 09.12.21 17:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 09/12/2021 16:56, Sandro Man
On 12/19/21 12:17, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
Hi all.
Sundials-6.0.0 is available, it's a major release that includes many
changes (https://github.com/LLNL/sundials/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md)
I compiled the new packages in Copr, rebuilt bout++ and octave which
need attention before we can pus
> Well I think OpenCL would be a good starting point since it's been around for
> a while
> and lots of applications use it.
>
> Fedora already has some of the base components already (hsakmt, rocm-runtime,
> llvm). For
> OCL, fedora would just need:
> - ROCm-Device-Libs (bitcode compiled by LLV
> Should it work in KDE/Gnome,etc?
>
> https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/refresh-rate-of-monitor/13481/3
@ Reon Beon
I don't really know what you are asking ... If there is an issue with your
monitor refresh rate, or changing the refresh rate does not work in any desktop
environment, maybe ope
Or xrandr?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedorapr
Should it work in KDE/Gnome,etc?
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/refresh-rate-of-monitor/13481/3
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://
> For anyone else wondering:
>
> https://rocmdocs.amd.com/en/latest/index.html
>
> AMD ROCm is the first open-source software development platform for
> HPC/Hyperscale-class GPU computing. AMD ROCm brings the UNIX
> philosophy of choice, minimalism and modular software development to
> GP
I know that "Fedora" cannot do it. I didn't made any request.
The point is that this proposal can be canceled/reverted if the nvidia-settings
GUI does not work on Wayland on time, or depending on what others think about
the use of nvidia-settings.
And... Please don't imagine things I didn't sa
It would be nice to have the latest version of
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rocm-runtime also.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877523
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@
On 12/6/21 12:42, Mikel Olasagasti wrote:
Hi all,
I was updating some golang specs I've and switching them to use
go_generate_buildrequires.
I realized that some specs that are using it fail to build if `%global
debug_package %{nil}` is not set. Same spec with all BuildRequires
defined works ju
On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 11:06:45PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Basically, it seems like we're moving too slowly to keep up with changes in
> > Kubernetes, with trickle-down consequences.
>
> Sure, I saw that ticket. But I fail to see how this is this a "new problem".
> If you use, for exampl
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211218.0):
ID: 1089876 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Sunday, December 19, 2021 10:22:57 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> So it seems that fedpkg doesn't (yet) know there's ~/.config/mock* at all.
Proposed fix: https://pagure.io/rpkg/pull-request/595
Pavel
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj
On 19.12.21 18:52, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 19.12.21 15:56, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Now, depending packages seem to be broken. Have ypu pushed the
side-tag incompletely, or does the new tesseract -3 bump soname again?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033986
https://bugzilla.redhat.c
On Sunday, December 19, 2021 9:56:20 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Sunday, December 19, 2021 4:55:28 PM CET Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 16, 2021 12:25:12 PM CST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock. Se
On Sunday, December 19, 2021 4:55:28 PM CET Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> On Thursday, December 16, 2021 12:25:12 PM CST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock. See the full
> > release notes [1]. The major change that happened is the re
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 07:40:00AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I tried building twice just in case it was a one-off issue but it failed
> the same way with the s390x unable to connect?
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=80185813
>
> Looks like I'm not the only one either:
>
Hi all.
Sundials-6.0.0 is available, it's a major release that includes many
changes (https://github.com/LLNL/sundials/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md)
I compiled the new packages in Copr, rebuilt bout++ and octave which
need attention before we can push them in Rawhide:
https://copr.fedorainfraclo
On 19. 12. 21 18:26, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
Hi everyone,
I hope you are having/had a good weekend. I am sending this email in accordance
with the Non-Responsive Maintainer Policy[0].
I created a non-responsive maintainer bug[1] for @ishcherb over two weeks ago
and have not received a resp
On 19.12.21 15:56, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Now, depending packages seem to be broken. Have ypu pushed the side-tag
incompletely, or does the new tesseract -3 bump soname again?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033986
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033984
https://bugzi
Hi everyone,
I hope you are having/had a good weekend. I am sending this email in accordance
with the Non-Responsive Maintainer Policy[0].
I created a non-responsive maintainer bug[1] for @ishcherb over two weeks ago
and have not received a response. I am happy to help maintain this package.
A
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 11:39 AM Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
> W dniu 19.12.2021 o 17:05, Michael Cronenworth pisze:
> > On 12/17/21 8:11 PM, Michael Berteaux wrote:
> >> On top of what others said, I add that there is also the
> >> nvidia-settings GUI that does not work on Wayland.
> >>
> >> I don't
On Sunday, December 19, 2021 6:35:13 AM CST Chen Chen wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I recently adopted an orphaned package. There are unwanted commits in a
> branch, and I'd like to reset this branch to be as same as rawhide. How can I
> achieve this?
> It seems force push were not allowed on src.f
W dniu 19.12.2021 o 17:05, Michael Cronenworth pisze:
On 12/17/21 8:11 PM, Michael Berteaux wrote:
On top of what others said, I add that there is also the
nvidia-settings GUI that does not work on Wayland.
I don't use it personally, but other people can use, for example,
application/game pro
On Sun, 2021-12-19 at 21:49 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Sandro Mani wrote on 2021/12/15 20:15:
> >
> > On 15.12.21 11:11, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > > Are you planning to bring these to F35, as well?
> > > Tesseract-5.0.0 appears to be mostly a bugfix release along with
> > > some other improv
On 12/17/21 8:11 PM, Michael Berteaux wrote:
On top of what others said, I add that there is also the nvidia-settings GUI
that does not work on Wayland.
I don't use it personally, but other people can use, for example,
application/game profiles.
It is also something to consider...
The nvidi
On Thursday, December 16, 2021 12:25:12 PM CST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock. See the full
> release notes [1]. The major change that happened is the removal of
> 'epel-8' config files, as a follow-up for [2] discussion (and of cours
Now, depending packages seem to be broken. Have ypu pushed the side-tag
incompletely, or does the new tesseract -3 bump soname again?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033986
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033984
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033988
___
Thanks, for answer. I build every day rpm packages from git locally with mock.
...
It might be more efficient to run a shell command in your build
environment to review /var/log/dnf.log, even in a "mock" build
environment, rather than trying to parse out the dependencies directly
b reading th
I tried building twice just in case it was a one-off issue but it failed
the same way with the s390x unable to connect?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=80185813
Looks like I'm not the only one either:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10431
Thanks,
Richard
__
On 19. 12. 21 13:35, Chen Chen wrote:
Hi everyone,
I recently adopted an orphaned package. There are unwanted commits in a branch,
and I'd like to reset this branch to be as same as rawhide. How can I achieve
this?
It seems force push were not allowed on src.f . I also do not want to commit a
Sandro Mani wrote on 2021/12/15 20:15:
On 15.12.21 11:11, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Are you planning to bring these to F35, as well?
Tesseract-5.0.0 appears to be mostly a bugfix release along with some other
improvements, so I dunno (and haven't tested so far - the heads up was a few
hours be
Hi everyone,
I recently adopted an orphaned package. There are unwanted commits in a branch,
and I'd like to reset this branch to be as same as rawhide. How can I achieve
this?
It seems force push were not allowed on src.f . I also do not want to commit a
"git revert" on it to avoid "x commits
On Thursday, December 16, 2021 6:07:10 PM CET Jeremy Newton wrote:
> Full disclosure, I am both a Fedora packager and an employee at AMD.
> To be clear, the following is not at all endorsed by my employer; my
> interest and use of Fedora is purely a personal hobby and I would like to
> keep it that
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211218.0):
ID: 1089747 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
37 matches
Mail list logo
