On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:15:24PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> shown that the answer is "probably not, actually". And it's _really
> hard_ for me to go to Red Hat and say "hey, um, I know you're paying
> for this Gitlab contract we can use, but can you please do this huge
> project, with ongoing
Sergio Belkin wrote:
> Do you think that (Linux) Software RAID is still relevant in this "breve
> new world" of cloud/devops ?
Yes! It is *the* solution for desktop computers to be safe from data loss
due to disk failures.
Kevin Kofler
___
deve
On 12/1/21 13:32, Sergio Belkin wrote:
Sorry for the OT.
This is probably a question better suited for the users@ list than devel@.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject
On Monday, November 29, 2021 4:46:42 PM CET Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 04:38:26PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Monday, November 29, 2021 4:02:23 PM CET Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:24:12PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > >
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021, at 4:34 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Colin Walters said:
>> https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/commit/eb74f2ea3e9b453902315539e4f327481162c4f8
>
> Missed this message earlier... this seems like this should be the
> default on pretty much all Fedora
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 09:29:43AM -0600, Brandon Nielsen wrote:
> On 11/29/21 1:33 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Users_are_admins_by_default_in_Anaconda
> >
> >= Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI =
> >
> >== Summary ==
> >
> >The Anaconda in
Once upon a time, Colin Walters said:
> https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/commit/eb74f2ea3e9b453902315539e4f327481162c4f8
Missed this message earlier... this seems like this should be the
default on pretty much all Fedora setups, with documentation on how to
change it if you secure t
Hi community,
Sorry for the OT.
I'd like to know your opinion based on current facts :)
Do you think that (Linux) Software RAID is still relevant in this "breve
new world" of cloud/devops ?
Thanks for your opinions :)
--
--
Sergio Belkin
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
On 25/11/2021 15:11, Ben Beasley wrote:
I’d like to point to
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sleef/blob/epel7/f/sleef.spec as a
working example of a package that is built with a devtoolset in EPEL7.
While I maintain the sleef package, the EPEL7 backport was contributed
by Dave Love.
– Ben Bea
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 03:00:34PM -0500, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 1, 2021 9:10:33 AM EST Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > Also, the plocate-updatedb service was not started after installing
> > it, so I can't use locate until the DB is created. Is that expected?
> > Does it wait
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 08:55:44PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:13:07PM -0500, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 4:54 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 01:52:43PM -0500, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:13:07PM -0500, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 4:54 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 01:52:43PM -0500, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:19 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > >
> > > > == How To Test ==
> > >
On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 15:57 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 22:39 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 16:03 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11:13:19AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > I don't use sudo , and I'm against the use of s
On Wednesday, December 1, 2021 9:10:33 AM EST Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Also, the plocate-updatedb service was not started after installing
> it, so I can't use locate until the DB is created. Is that expected?
> Does it wait until the timer runs it?
I believe that is normal. Earlier releases of m
* Daniel P. Berrangé:
> We do much the same in libvirt
>
> https://github.com/libvirt/libvirt-python/pull/4#issuecomment-662443409
>
> FWIW, there's no need to write a bot to achieve this - there's a
> a github action:
>
> https://github.com/apps/repo-lockdown
>
> you can simply enable for you
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 05:42:06PM +0100, Alejandro Saez Morollon wrote:
> > Any takers?
> Will do :)
Thank you!
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le..
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 9:49 AM Chris Adams wrote:
> So, not directly related to the proposal, but jumping in here because it
> goes with the above statement - the "root should be left locked" setup
> is a problem that keeps single-user mode broken. I tried to follow the
> Fedora (and other distr
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 3:25 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 05:52:26PM -0500, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 4:53:12 PM EST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 01:52:43PM -0500, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 4:54 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 01:52:43PM -0500, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:19 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > > == How To Test ==
> > > # Install `plocate` (`sudo dnf install plocate --allowerasing`)
> > > # Wai
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 5:34 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 11:23 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OstreeNativeContainer
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > Enhance the (rpm-)ostree stack to natively support OCI/Docker
> > containers as a transport and
https://github.com/judovana/FedoraSystemJdkBump/blob/main/scritps/spammer/exemplarResults/verboseResults.txt
Here you go.
J.
On 12/1/21 01:39, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 11/30/21 01:53, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 11/29/21 15:01, Mat Booth wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 13:16, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 11:40:43AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 01:20:53PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > Note the GNOME auto-closer provides a comment telling the user that the
> > primary repo is on gitlab and pointing them to where it is. Logging
>
>
> How hard
On Wed, Dec 1 2021 at 11:40:43 AM -0500, Matthew Miller
wrote:
How hard would it be to actually automatically mirror the PR?
It actually does that, but if you don't follow up on GitLab it's just
going to get closed, since PRs from new contributors are never good
enough to merge the first tim
Hi!
The timout is a bit of issue. It is chromium, javas, and now I'm aware aout
hdf5.
I had not not manually touched the timeout, because it was "jsut" first round.
I will keep it in mind, and prolong it in next rerun.
Tomorrow, I will send personal eamil to each maintainer. with his statistics
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 5:40 PM Matthew Miller
wrote:
> > https://github.com/sourcegraph/src-cli
>
> Okay, so, Jan Kuparinen (copperi) is working on this. I'm happy to sponsor
> him, but I am not up on the state of Go packaging, like, even a little bit.
> Can someone help by reviewing his packages
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 01:20:53PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Note the GNOME auto-closer provides a comment telling the user that the
> primary repo is on gitlab and pointing them to where it is. Logging
How hard would it be to actually automatically mirror the PR?
--
Matthew Miller
F
> https://github.com/sourcegraph/src-cli
Okay, so, Jan Kuparinen (copperi) is working on this. I'm happy to sponsor
him, but I am not up on the state of Go packaging, like, even a little bit.
Can someone help by reviewing his packages? He's tackling the various
dependencies, starting with:
https:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 11:23 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OstreeNativeContainer
>
> == Summary ==
>
> Enhance the (rpm-)ostree stack to natively support OCI/Docker
> containers as a transport and delivery mechanism for operating system
> content.
>
> This is the
Dne 01. 12. 21 v 16:16 Jonathan Wakely napsal(a):
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 19:36, Ben Cotton wrote:
== Release Notes ==
In the User spoke, the "Make this user administrator" checkbox is now
checked by default. This improves installation experience for users
who do not know and need to rely on th
Dne 01. 12. 21 v 1:10 Michel Alexandre Salim napsal(a):
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:08:19AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30 2021 at 10:57:37 AM -0500, Colin Walters
wrote:
https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/commit/eb74f2ea3e9b453902315539e4f327481162c4f8
Should we b
Missing expected images:
Soas live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2/46 (x86_64)
ID: 1075317 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1075317
ID: 1075342 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.o
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 09:29 -0600, Brandon Nielsen wrote:
> On 11/29/21 1:33 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Users_are_admins_by_default_in_Anaconda
> >
> > = Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI =
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > The Anaconda in
Hello,
I would like to compile the tree-sitter parser generating tool. For this rust-
html-escape and rust-smallbitvec is missing in the distro. It would allow that
you can add additional languages for highlighting in neovim.
If someone who is familiar with rust could packages those two small
e
Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said:
> Boot with `systemd.debug-shell=1` and there will be a root console
> available on tty9 from very early in boot. Not sure if it's early
> enough for this specific scenario, but it is for a lot.
>
> You can also boot to the initramfs environment by booting
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:10:33PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> I have just installed plocate to try it on F34, and got:
>
> warning: /etc/updatedb.conf saved as /etc/updatedb.conf.rpmsave
>
> I reviewed the changes, and the new file is empty. Users will notice
> the difference. Is that expect
On Mon, Nov 29 2021 at 04:22:42 PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
Well that would be what I was missing. I guess this should be much
less controversial, then, if it's OK for people to just continue
using dist-git forever and completely ignore src-git? Nobody is ever
required to use something
On 11/29/21 1:33 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Users_are_admins_by_default_in_Anaconda
= Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI =
== Summary ==
The Anaconda installer GUI will have the administrative rights
checkbox on the User screen ticked by
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 19:36, Ben Cotton wrote:
> == Release Notes ==
>
> In the User spoke, the "Make this user administrator" checkbox is now
> checked by default. This improves installation experience for users
> who do not know and need to rely on the default values to guide them.
What's the c
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 14:39 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Di, 30.11.21 15:57, Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org)
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 22:39 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 16:03 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11
On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 at 17:20, Ben Cotton wrote:
> == Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
> The upgrade should be mostly invisible. It is possible that somebody
> might be relying on some very specific `mlocate` behaviour or parsing
> the `mlocate` database directly, but no such cases are currently
> kn
On Di, 30.11.21 15:57, Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 22:39 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 16:03 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11:13:19AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > I don't use sudo , and I'm ag
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:12:29PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 01. 12. 21 0:37, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 1 2021 at 12:27:35 AM +0100, Emmanuel Seyman
> > wrote:
> > > How do people using this setup prevent people from submitting PR and
> > > issues to the Github mirror where th
On 01. 12. 21 0:37, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1 2021 at 12:27:35 AM +0100, Emmanuel Seyman
wrote:
How do people using this setup prevent people from submitting PR and
issues to the Github mirror where they cannot be applied/fixed?
For GNOME we just set up a bot that autocloses ever
On 01. 12. 21 13:03, Hunor Csomortáni wrote:
Packit developer and Source-git SIG member here, joining two days late
to this thread.
One important thing to call out: the source-git workflow is not
officially adopted by the Fedora Community. All the work that is
ongoing in this space is experiment
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 6/142 (aarch64), 1/208 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211130.n.0):
ID: 1075018 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi
URL
See
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/2OCCFIKT7LZ7IPO3OKIEH3TDTGERSORM/
Would adding automatically generated obsoletes to 3624 Python packages have any
observable negative impact (e.g. on the repodata size or time to resolve deps)?
--
Mi
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 7:09 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> Hi, I have a question for the FESCo and Council candidates: do you
> support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on
> gitlab.com, which a proprietary software git forge?
>
> Fedora Council has already effectively stated tha
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211130.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211201.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 133
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.42 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211130.0):
ID: 1074830 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211130.0):
ID: 1074814 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 08:49 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Ben Cotton said:
> > Further, this change of defaults complements the default for root
> > account. The redesign of root setup screen in Fedora 35 makes it clear
> > that root should be left locked.
>
> So, not directly rel
On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 16:10 -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:08:19AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30 2021 at 10:57:37 AM -0500, Colin Walters
> > wrote:
> > > https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/commit/eb74f2ea3e9b453902315539e4f327481
52 matches
Mail list logo
