Fedora-Cloud-33-20211129.0 compose check report

2021-11-28 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211128.0): ID: 1072905 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: inconsistent installprocess between spins

2021-11-28 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 05:45:46AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > I also find it interesting that QA has no problems with there being 3 > different options for initial setup (GNOME Initial Setup, Anaconda Initial > Setup, or doing it all during the Anaconda installation), but having a >

Re: inconsistent installprocess between spins

2021-11-28 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Adam Williamson wrote: > Not really. "Fedora.next" was about *allowing* editions / spins to make > different choices like this. Workstation made this choice because it > fits in with their vision about how deployment should work. Other > spins/editions don't have to have the same vision or make the

Re: Question about toolbox purpose/usage

2021-11-28 Thread Abhiram Kuchibhotla
Since we're talking about toolbox, is there a way to get rid of or change the hexagon in the prompt after you enter a toolbox? My google-fu failed me on that one. That being said, I'm having way too much fun making custom toolbox images for the devs at my workplace. It's a pretty big hit here. H

Re: Question about toolbox purpose/usage

2021-11-28 Thread Otto Urpelainen
Sergio Belkin kirjoitti 29.11.2021 klo 3.32: Hi, I've been playing a bit with toolbox, what is it intended for? I understand that was intended primarily for immutable OS. But documentation says that it can be used on the Workstation edition too. AFAIK it's only useful if you don't want to mess u

Question about toolbox purpose/usage

2021-11-28 Thread Sergio Belkin
Hi, I've been playing a bit with toolbox, what is it intended for? I understand that was intended primarily for immutable OS. But documentation says that it can be used on the Workstation edition too. AFAIK it's only useful if you don't want to mess up your /usr of your host operating system by in

Re: [EPEL-devel] Mock/Copr default epel-8-* configuration to be changed

2021-11-28 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 7:06 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 2:02 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:26 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 6:19 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:05 AM Mi

Re: [EPEL-devel] Mock/Copr default epel-8-* configuration to be changed

2021-11-28 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 2:02 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:26 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 6:19 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:05 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > > > > > Dne 22. 11. 21 v 15:00 Pavel Raiskup

Re: [EPEL-devel] Mock/Copr default epel-8-* configuration to be changed

2021-11-28 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
@Miroslav Suchý asked me to sum up my suggestions for using internal mirrors more clearly, So, adding to his published Google Doc: 5 - Use internal RHEL mirrors. It's difficult to license multiple RHEL releases and enable multiple yum dnf or yum channels and supported RHEL or CentOS releases and

Re: GitHub source URLs not working

2021-11-28 Thread Sebastian Crane
Dear Susi, > The URLs used to work. Has anyone else noticed the same problem? Good news! GitHub has fixed this issue, and the URLs now work again: https://github.com/github/feedback/discussions/8149#discussioncomment-1712006 Best wishes, Sebastian __

Re: GitHub source URLs not working

2021-11-28 Thread Maxwell G via devel
On Friday, November 26, 2021 6:15:33 PM EST Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Fri, 2021-11-26 at 14:37 -0500, Susi Lehtola wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > I am experiencing problems updating packages employing GitHub source > > URLs. For instance, > > > > $ spectool -g python-pyscf.spec > > Downloading: > > h

Re: sysusers scriptlets: what to do if upstream includes the config files?

2021-11-28 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 03:29:05PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2021-11-27 at 09:01 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > Adam Williamson writes: > > > > > [...] > > > > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/UsersAndGroups/#_dynamic_allocation > > > > > > say: >

Fedora-Rawhide-20211128.n.0 compose check report

2021-11-28 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 4/208 (x86_64), 6/142 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in

HEADS UP: libgit2 1.1.0 → 1.3.0 update

2021-11-28 Thread Igor Raits
Hi, This is an ABI-compatible change (should be still API-compatible), so I'm going to perform an update in the side tags for f34/f35/f36 including rebuild of all affected packages. I don't expect issues, so this is more like a FYI. ___ devel mailing li

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20211128.n.0 changes

2021-11-28 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211127.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211128.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:5 Upgraded packages: 40 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 258.83 KiB Size of dropped packages

Fedora-Cloud-34-20211128.0 compose check report

2021-11-28 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211126.0): ID: 1072459 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Fedora-Cloud-35-20211128.0 compose check report

2021-11-28 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211127.0): ID: 1072443 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op