No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211126.0):
ID: 1071870 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 5:50 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 11:30 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > It's also Friday right after Thanksgiving, "Black Friday". And most
> > python modules .spec files, which use pypi.org as their source
> > repository rathter than github, s
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2021-11-29
# Time: ** 16:00 ** UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat
Greetings testers!
Last week's meeting was pretty sparsely attended, so let's run it again
to get input from a few
The guidelines for sysusers packaging:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/UsersAndGroups/#_dynamic_allocation
say:
"Create a .sysusers file with the user definition and add
it to the specfile as a source...use the %sysusers_create_compat macro
to consume it in the %pre sec
On Fri, 2021-11-26 at 14:37 -0500, Susi Lehtola wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I am experiencing problems updating packages employing GitHub source
> URLs. For instance,
>
> $ spectool -g python-pyscf.spec
> Downloading:
> https://github.com/pyscf/pyscf/archive/v2.0.1/pyscf-2.0.1.tar.gz
> Download failed:
>
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 11:30 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> It's also Friday right after Thanksgiving, "Black Friday". And most
> python modules .spec files, which use pypi.org as their source
> repository rathter than github, seem to be workin.
(snip)
> Directly referencing github is sometime
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 4:39 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 8:37 PM Susi Lehtola
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I am experiencing problems updating packages employing GitHub source
> > URLs. For instance,
> >
> > $ spectool -g python-pyscf.spec
> > Downloading:
> > https://g
Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 8:37 PM Susi Lehtola
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I am experiencing problems updating packages employing GitHub source
> URLs. For instance,
>
> $ spectool -g python-pyscf.spec
> Downloading:
> https://github.com/pyscf/pyscf/archive/v2.0.1/pyscf-2.0.1.tar.gz
> Download failed:
> 404 C
Dear Susi,
> $ spectool -g python-pyscf.spec
> Downloading:
> https://github.com/pyscf/pyscf/archive/v2.0.1/pyscf-2.0.1.tar.gz
> Download failed:
> ...
> The URLs used to work. Has anyone else noticed the same problem?
Maybe GitHub has changed its source archive paths -
https://github.com/pyscf/p
Hi,
I am experiencing problems updating packages employing GitHub source
URLs. For instance,
$ spectool -g python-pyscf.spec
Downloading:
https://github.com/pyscf/pyscf/archive/v2.0.1/pyscf-2.0.1.tar.gz
Download failed:
404 Client Error: Not Found for url:
https://codeload.github.com/pyscf/pyscf
Hi Otto,
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 2:27 AM Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> Blaise Pabon kirjoitti 25.11.2021 klo 5.43:
>
> When the docs were migrated, the intent was, of course, to make them
> better, not worse. If things have regressed in some way, I would like to
> fix them. Could you be more speci
On 11/20/21 21:00, devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Shortly I will start building hdf5 1.12.1, vtk 9.1.0, and libdap 3.20.8
for rawhide in side tag f36-build-side-47974
I will be rebuilding all dependencies as well.
Dependencies with known issues:
- med https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 4/208 (x86_64), 18/142 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211125.n.0):
ID: 1071469 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login
URL: http
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211125.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211126.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:12
Upgraded packages: 96
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 13.45 KiB
Size of dropped packages
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 36 Rawhide 20211126.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Many thanks , side-tag submitted to bodhi
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b58af96f33
On Fri, 2021-11-26 at 12:44 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote on 2021/11/22 21:49:
> > Hi,
> >
> > ImageMagick 6.9.12.30 have more security fixes and it was built on
> > Raw
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 04:04:25PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 11:11 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> > * Peter Robinson:
> >
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 10:43 AM Florian Weimer
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> * Ben Cotton:
> > >>
> > >> > == Detailed Description ==
> > >>
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211125.0):
ID: 1071360 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211125.0):
ID: 1071344 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hi everyone,
This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering)
Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this
report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat
(https://libera.chat/).
If you wish to read this in form of a blog post, check the post
20 matches
Mail list logo
