Hi,
As the name says, this is a review request for the orphaned package oclock. I
find that the old spec file from F34 complies without errors and so would like
to maintain it. But first, I need a review. Could someone please help review
the package?
Thanks,
aa...@fedoraproject.org.
Thank you, your answer makes sense and clarifies to me what is on the
instructions page. If I were editing the page, I would make sure that it says
somewhere that we need to ssh in and then create the directories and
permissions. the first part is not mentioned anywhere on that page.
Thanks aga
I am guessing that the public_html/ directory in your home directory
does not exist or does not have the read and/or execute bits set for all
users. Try:
$ ssh aa...@fedorapeople.org 'mkdir -p public_html; chmod 0755 public_html'
to make sure the directory exists with the correct permissions.
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2021-11-22
# Time: ** 16:00 ** UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat
Greetings testers!
We didn't meet for a few weeks and there's quite a lot of active
topics, so let's get together o
Hello,
I have been trying to upload a couple of my files to my fedorapeople.org space
following the instructions here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/fedorapeople.org#fedorapeople.org
and have been confused.
Actually, I go to my https://aarem.fedorapeople.org/ account and get:
Done: https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/fedy/issues/90
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-
Dne 17. 11. 21 v 22:44 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
So, wine needs i686 multilib packages on x86_64 even if you don't want
to use it to run games, but just for running*any* Windows
application
Beside games that is: accounting SW, photobook creation, legal sw, logistic sw,
I just checked s
For some years now, I have maintained a collection of mathematical packages
and some of their dependencies in Fedora. I actually stopped using the
packages in question awhile ago, but have been maintaining them out of
inertia. I would like to free up time to get some code checking and formal
meth
Dne 19. 11. 21 v 15:10 Stephen John Smoogen napsal(a):
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 07:12, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 7:05 AM Ahmed Almeleh
wrote:
I do think voting for packages to be included in the next Fedora release is an
amazing idea maybe we could create a survey through Goog
Hi folks! Just wanted to let you know that Bodhi's "Re-Trigger Tests"
mechanism should now also work for tests run by openQA. Previously, it
only worked for tests run by Fedora CI.
From now on, if you hit "Re-Trigger Tests" or run `bodhi updates
trigger-tests` on an update that openQA has run some
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 01:57:12PM +, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> I opened the following:
>
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10396
>
> I am not quite sure what happens after this, so I thought that I would
> mention this here.
The package needs to go through re-review, because it was r
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:03 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 7:02 AM wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > You are kindly invited to the meeting:
> >ELN SIG on 2021-11-19 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
> >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
> >
> > The meeting will
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 11:11:49AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Probably "sourcegraph" or "srcgraph". Have you asked them to consider
> renaming it upstream?
I mentioned it to them, yeah. They seemed open.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
___
de
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 10:49 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> I've been talking with the awesome people at Sourcegraph, and they're
> interested in indexing our packages. Still working out what that'l look like
> exactly, but I'm pretty excited about it. (They're an open-source company
> with a SaaS
I've been talking with the awesome people at Sourcegraph, and they're
interested in indexing our packages. Still working out what that'l look like
exactly, but I'm pretty excited about it. (They're an open-source company
with a SaaS product. Also at least some of their folks run Fedora Linux, so
th
updated the spec files for both gbuffy and libPropList. However, I wonder how
to license it: currently they are under GPL and LGPL. Should these be GPLv2.1
and LGPLv2.1 since these are really old packages (even though I cleaned up
gbuffy some). Btw, if I patch up a package that does not seem to
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 12:40:01 +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi folks,
Replacing %{autorelease -p} with %autorelease -p (removing the curly
brackets) seems to make it work. So, solved :)
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 07:12, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 7:05 AM Ahmed Almeleh
> wrote:
> >
> > I do think voting for packages to be included in the next Fedora release is
> > an amazing idea maybe we could create a survey through Google forms or make
> > a custom website fo
I opened the following:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10396
I am not quite sure what happens after this, so I thought that I would mention
this here.
Thanks!
On Friday, November 19, 2021, 07:07:43 AM CST, Globe Trotter via devel
wrote:
Oh, the package is called pkgconfig(xorg-macro
On 19/11/2021 03:55, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
(Eventually) going down the pam-u2f upgrade
process was on my infinitely countable TODO
list for some time. Thanks for raising it!
I am also willing to be a (co)-maintainer for pam-u2f
if needed/necessary/desired (I am the maintainer for
what will end
Oh, the package is called pkgconfig(xorg-macros), sorry for the goofup.
OK, oclock builds, I have filed a ticket on releng to unorphan the package.
On Friday, November 19, 2021, 03:39:37 AM CST, Björn 'besser82' Esser
wrote:
Am Freitag, dem 19.11.2021 um 06:17 + schrieb Globe Tro
Tomasz Torcz a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 05:32:28AM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> > Video2X would be a nice add.
>
> There's a package wishlist here:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist
>
> But adding the package there is no guarantee anyone will pick
Hi folks,
I'm working on a new package, and am using the forge macros and the rpm
autospec macros. The current WIP spec is here:
https://pagure.io/python-neurotune/blob/main/f/python-neurotune.spec
When running `fedpkg mockbuild` here, I get an odd error where it writes
a src.rpm with a release s
I do see your point though
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021, 12:12 Neal Gompa, wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 7:05 AM Ahmed Almeleh
> wrote:
> >
> > I do think voting for packages to be included in the next Fedora release
> is an amazing idea maybe we could create a survey through Google forms or
> make a
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 7:05 AM Ahmed Almeleh
wrote:
>
> I do think voting for packages to be included in the next Fedora release is
> an amazing idea maybe we could create a survey through Google forms or make a
> custom website for Fedora. I.e. Telling users select all packages you would
> l
I do think voting for packages to be included in the next Fedora release is
an amazing idea maybe we could create a survey through Google forms or make
a custom website for Fedora. I.e. Telling users select all packages you
would like to see in Fedora 36.
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021, 09:59 Tomasz Torcz,
Le 19/11/2021 à 11:39, Mamoru TASAKA a écrit :
Related source code on libraqm:
https://github.com/HOST-Oman/libraqm/blob/master/src/raqm.c#L1726
So with HAVE_FT_GET_TRANSFORM defined, libraqm is doing some
"transformation", perhaps some rotation of something.
Confirmed and reported https://g
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2021/11/19 19:25:
Remi Collet wrote on 2021/11/19 18:02:
This first affects libraqm, and so its users
so libgd
so php
Initial report https://github.com/libgd/libgd/issues/790
Tracked as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022957
In short
libraqm is broken on F35
Remi Collet wrote on 2021/11/19 18:02:
This first affects libraqm, and so its users
so libgd
so php
Initial report https://github.com/libgd/libgd/issues/790
Tracked as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022957
In short
libraqm is broken on F35
same version works as expected on F34
F34
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 05:32:28AM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> Video2X would be a nice add.
There's a package wishlist here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist
But adding the package there is no guarantee anyone will pick it up.
I believe most items are ther
Am Freitag, dem 19.11.2021 um 06:17 + schrieb Globe Trotter via
devel:
> Hi,
>
> oclock has been orphaned from F35 so i was trying to roll my own rpm
> (building off the spec file for F34). I noticed that the spec file
> contains:
>
> BuildRequires: pkgconfig(xorg-macros) >= 1.8
>
> but I c
This first affects libraqm, and so its users
so libgd
so php
Initial report https://github.com/libgd/libgd/issues/790
Tracked as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022957
In short
libraqm is broken on F35
same version works as expected on F34
F34 version works on F35
So, really looks
32 matches
Mail list logo
