Hi! I will push the update for rust-svgtypes, done in a sidetag, in two weeks
unless there is an objection. A member of the rust-sig will have to update
rust-ttf_parser. if need i can update rust-owned_ttf_parser too.
f36-build-side-47900
f35-build-side-47902
f34-build-side-47904
Sent with Prot
On 11/15/21 12:03 PM, PGNet Dev wrote:
launch @ shell
VDPAU_DRIVER=nvidia MOZ_LOG="Dmabuf:5, PlatformDecoderModule:5" firefox
I think you mean:
LIBVA_DRIVER_NAME=nvidia firefox
I gave this a shot today, but running a video crashes the tab. Yes, we are almost
there, but the VA-API / VD
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Or if we recorded all command line options we care about into LTO bytecode
> (Optimization/Target options are recorded already on a per-function basis
> but I'm worried about others), just have a gcc driver mode that turns
> a non-fat LTO object into normal non-LTO object.
T
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 02:15:49PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> == User Experience ==
>> Any current users of Fedora on ARMv7 devices won't be able to upgrade
>> to Fedora 37, they will have to stay on Fedora 36 until it's EOL.
>
> Please add "and will have to
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:pbrobinson| Peter Robinson]]
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveWirelessExtensions
>
> == Summary ==
> The legacy wireless extensions interface was replaced by the new
> mac80211/cfg80211 interface in 2007. The legacy Wireless Extensions
> support has be
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 8:10 PM Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 16.11.2021 um 20:37 schrieb Miro Hrončok :
> >
> > On 15. 11. 21 20:15, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetireARMv7
> >> == Owner ==
> >> * Name: [[User:pbrobinson| Peter Robinson]]
> >> * Email:
> >
> > M
> Am 16.11.2021 um 21:23 schrieb Stephen John Smoogen :
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 15:10 Peter Boy wrote:
>
> ...
> This could (hopefully) solve a number of problems raised by various
> contributors to the discussion (and preserve the „trademark").
>
>
> The main problem is that armv
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 9:27 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 16. 11. 21 20:47, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > The announcement of the Change proposal to drop armv7 support with F37
> > has reminded me of something that I wanted to ask about some time ago:
> > How we could work towa
On 16. 11. 21 21:23, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 10:06 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 09:47:47AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Kevin Fenzi:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:41:16AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Kevin Fenzi:
Isn't this an ideal use case for c
On 16. 11. 21 20:47, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Hi everybody,
The announcement of the Change proposal to drop armv7 support with F37
has reminded me of something that I wanted to ask about some time ago:
How we could work towards reducing the number of packages we build for
i686.
Our current approa
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 10:06 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 09:47:47AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Kevin Fenzi:
> >
> > > On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:41:16AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > >> * Kevin Fenzi:
> > >>
> > >> > Isn't this an ideal use case for copr?
> > >>
>
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 15:10 Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
> > Am 16.11.2021 um 20:37 schrieb Miro Hrončok :
> >
> > On 15. 11. 21 20:15, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetireARMv7
> >> == Owner ==
> >> * Name: [[User:pbrobinson| Peter Robinson]]
> >> * Email:
> >
> > May
> Robbie Harwood writes:
> Fabio Valentini writes:
>> Since it's not practical to modify almost all Fedora packages to add
>> "ExcludeArch: %{ix86}" to them, we'd probably need a different
>> machanism for this.
> Is it really not? This seems the easiest way to go about it, honestly
> - ju
> Am 16.11.2021 um 20:37 schrieb Miro Hrončok :
>
> On 15. 11. 21 20:15, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetireARMv7
>> == Owner ==
>> * Name: [[User:pbrobinson| Peter Robinson]]
>> * Email:
>
> May I suggest to include
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/li
Fabio Valentini writes:
> Since it's not practical to modify almost all Fedora packages to add
> "ExcludeArch: %{ix86}" to them, we'd probably need a different
> machanism for this. I have a vague idea:
Is it really not? This seems the easiest way to go about it, honestly -
just have it be perm
Hi everybody,
The announcement of the Change proposal to drop armv7 support with F37
has reminded me of something that I wanted to ask about some time ago:
How we could work towards reducing the number of packages we build for
i686.
Our current approach, which is to "build everything but ship alm
On 15. 11. 21 20:15, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetireARMv7
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:pbrobinson| Peter Robinson]]
* Email:
May I suggest to include
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/a...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/YC2LYBJSFKDAVBUJAIFQCCBS5VLW5T
Am Dienstag, dem 16.11.2021 um 15:32 +0100 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
> On 13. 11. 21 11:03, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> > Am Freitag, dem 12.11.2021 um 21:33 +0100 schrieb Björn 'besser82'
> > Esser:
> > > Am Donnerstag, dem 11.11.2021 um 15:54 +0100 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
>
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/45 (x86_64)
ID: 1065763 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1065763
ID: 1065771 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/10657
On 13. 11. 21 11:03, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
Am Freitag, dem 12.11.2021 um 21:33 +0100 schrieb Björn 'besser82'
Esser:
Am Donnerstag, dem 11.11.2021 um 15:54 +0100 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
Hello,
Since this update:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libnsl2/c/d2e2fab5e3ab07228a34f35ab8ec19
Hi,
I have a similar problem (but on a much smaller scale): The certbot stack
comprises ~ a dozen packages which should be updated in lockstep. We push the
same version to all supported Fedora releases + EPEL (mostly).
To do that somewhat efficiently I built/extended some scripts:
https://git
On 11/15/21 14:48, Fabio Valentini wrote:
I don't really have a solution here, but I'd be interested in looking
at this problem.
For example, most* [1] packages in the Rust stack will have (and
should! have) the same versions across all supported Fedora branches.
For any Rust packages that I pus
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 09:17:39AM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2023118
Reviewed.
> >Happy to review in exchange.
Maybe take https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2023514?
It should be very quick too.
Zbyszek
___
I love plantuml and would be happy to take it.
I've made several attempts over the past four years to become a fully
qualified packager but I have not made it all the way.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021, 4:58 AM Jan Šafránek
wrote:
> PlantUML package is free to take. It has few open bugs, mostly relate
PlantUML package is free to take. It has few open bugs, mostly related to Java
dependencies and it needs an update from upstream. Otherwise it requires very
low effort to maintain it, upstream is stable and friendly.
https://plantuml.com/
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/plantuml
https://bugzi
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-2025.0):
ID: 1065715 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 08:34:07AM +, Ahmed Almeleh wrote:
> I agree that the ARMv7 architecture is in decline and echo the opinion
> of Zbigniew
> that the user base will be very low once the EOL for F36 falls.
>
> Overall I think it is best to remove the ARMv7 architecture. It may also
> mak
I agree that the ARMv7 architecture is in decline and echo the opinion
of Zbigniew
that the user base will be very low once the EOL for F36 falls.
Overall I think it is best to remove the ARMv7 architecture. It may also
make it easier to push advanced features into new releases quicker.
Thanks,
On 15.11.21 15:20, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'll be updating to OpenSceneGraph 3.6.5 and osgearth 3.2 in rawhide
in the f36-build-side-47862 side tag, and I'll also rebuild the
following packages:
fgrun-2016.3.1-45.fc36.src.rpm
FlightGear-2020.3.11-1.fc36.src.rpm
scribus-1.5.7-6.fc36.src.rpm
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 02:15:49PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetireARMv7
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:pbrobinson| Peter Robinson]]
> * Email:
>
> == Detailed Description ==
>
> The ARMv7 arm architecture was the second variant of the arm
> architectur
30 matches
Mail list logo
