No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-2022.0):
ID: 1064396 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Previously, the License field was “GPLv2+ and GPLv2 and GPLv3+ and
LGPLv2+ and BSD and MIT and Boost”.
This is corrected and simplified as follows:
The GPLv2-only sources were removed downstream some time ago, and the
functionality they provide patched out, since their license is
incompatible
On Sat, 2021-11-13 at 10:28 -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-11-13 at 11:57 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >
> > This has been discussed many many times. The packaging guidelines
> > have
> > been updated to say globs "SHOULD NOT" be used [1], and I think
> > there
On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 10:28:03AM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-11-13 at 11:57 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >
> > This has been discussed many many times. The packaging guidelines
> > have
> > been updated to say globs "SHOULD NOT" be used [1], and I think the
On Sat, 2021-11-13 at 11:57 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> This has been discussed many many times. The packaging guidelines
> have
> been updated to say globs "SHOULD NOT" be used [1], and I think there
> is a
> broad agreement that this is a good thing. Unfortunately many
> packag
On 11/12/21 13:47, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 3:27 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
Can someone who understands the MBS tell me what's up with this build?
https://mbs.fedoraproject.org/module-build-service/2/module-builds/13374
Every once in a while, for reasons we don't full
On 11/12/21 23:55, Jan K wrote:
My name is Jan Kuparinen
I work as a DevOps engineer. In the past I have made rpm packages of a
private project, so I have some idea of packaging progress. I have also
made some contributions to various Fedora projects.
I took a look at the orphaned package lis
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 11:51:43AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> It went to annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org, but I guess I should have
> also sent it to devel-announce? mattdm has suggested that we need
> something like a 'contributor-announce' for things like this.
Yeah it's on my guilt-list of t
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 7/206 (x86_64), 6/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-2021
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 12:49:40PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 2:55 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Since this update:
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libnsl2/c/d2e2fab5e3ab07228a34f35ab8ec1954581153d0?branch=rawhide
> >
> > Nothing in rawhide b
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-2022.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-2023.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 92
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 444.25 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
W dniu 13.11.2021 o 11:10, Julian Sikorski pisze:
Hi,
I originally posted this into bugzilla [1] and onto mono bug tracker
[2], but we were unable to solve the problem. Given that F33 is going
EOL soon and I will have to choose between losing my test case or
running without updates, I decided
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 36 Rawhide 2023.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Hi,
I originally posted this into bugzilla [1] and onto mono bug tracker
[2], but we were unable to solve the problem. Given that F33 is going
EOL soon and I will have to choose between losing my test case or
running without updates, I decided to post here.
In brief, since upgrading to F34, mo
Am Freitag, dem 12.11.2021 um 21:33 +0100 schrieb Björn 'besser82'
Esser:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 11.11.2021 um 15:54 +0100 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Since this update:
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libnsl2/c/d2e2fab5e3ab07228a34f35ab8ec1954581153d0?branch=rawhide
> >
>
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-2021.0):
ID: 1063801 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 13/11/2021 07:55, Jan K wrote:
If indeed this package is in need of a maintainer, I think I can help
with that.
You can easily adopt it. Just press the "Take" button.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list --
17 matches
Mail list logo
