On 10/11/2021 08:01, Andreas Schneider wrote:
Can you point me to those tons of bundled JS blobs in the source tarball from
the above link please? I don't see them.
https://github.com/microsoft/vscode/blob/main/yarn.lock - 11K lines of
external dependencies.
All of them must be compiled from
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211109.0):
ID: 1059220 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Monday, November 8, 2021 6:04:12 PM CET Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Andreas Schneider wrote:
>
> > I have electron building offline for Fedora, you can find it here:
> >
> > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/network:im:signal/nodejs-electron
>
>
> I see from the presence of electro
On Tuesday, November 9, 2021 10:28:12 AM CET Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 08/11/2021 16:47, Andreas Schneider wrote:
>
> > I have electron building offline for Fedora, you can find it here:
> > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/network:im:signal/nodejs-electron
>
>
> Electron core
On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 03:56 +, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) via devel wrote:
> Does anyone know if it's possible to set bugzilla.redhat.com to email me a
> copy of new bugs or comments that I create?
Try: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Then in the "The change was made by me" row
Hi,
Does anyone know if it's possible to set bugzilla.redhat.com to email me a copy
of new bugs or comments that I create?
Thanks,
Maxwell
--
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
PGP Key Fingerprint: f57c76e5a238fe0a628e2ecef79e4e25e8c661f8
gotmax@e.email
signature.asc
Description: PGP s
Hi everyone,
On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 17:55 -0600, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 18:30 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > The bug was opened for a different problem. Once it was fixed, this
> > spam
> > started showing up. This bug was reopened.
> >
> > Who knows what spam will
On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 18:30 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> The bug was opened for a different problem. Once it was fixed, this
> spam
> started showing up. This bug was reopened.
>
> Who knows what spam will show up after this bug gets fixed…
>
Hi Sam,
The bug was just not fixed properly in t
Peter Boy writes:
While updating right after installation of Fedora Server 35 today I get:
> Running Scriptlet:
tzdata-2021b-1.fc35.noarch 306/306
> Failed to connect to bus: Invalid argument
>
> Failed to connect to bus: Invalid argument
>
> Failed to connect t
Nov 9, 2021 9:06:58 AM Robbie Harwood :
> Vitaly Zaitsev via devel writes:
>
>> On 08/11/2021 16:47, Andreas Schneider wrote:
>>> I have electron building offline for Fedora, you can find it here:
>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/network:im:signal/nodejs-electron
>>
>> Electron core
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:41:16AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Kevin Fenzi:
>
> > Isn't this an ideal use case for copr?
>
> I don't know. I could piece together the Koji API fairly easily, and
> had hoped to reuse some of the script logic.
>
> Or does COPR have direct support this? Can I
Kia ora to you, and welcome to Fedora!
I hope you find something interesting to contribute in.
p
On 10/27/21 23:30, Aiden Langley wrote:
Kia ora koutou,
I'm nedia, I live in NZ & I've been knocking about the matrix/irc for a few days now.
I'll be 28 on the 30th, I've been using Fedora for ab
I cannot get Gedit to do this when I use it as a text editor, even for
extended periods with intermittent thrashing, like loads of edits
without a save, etc...
It does sound almost hardware specific, maybe failing keyboard.?
Stephen
On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 12:49 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On
On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 18:59 +0100, Michael J. Baars wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> I didn't install any update, apparently the update is already included with
> the release version of Fedora 35, because it won't install from the command
> line and the versions from the build match the versions from the rel
Hey folks! Just a heads up about test failures in openQA overnight and
today. The server_cockpit_updates test was failing overnight; this was
because I switched from virtio to qxl graphics to work around a bug in
Rawhide. Unfortunately there seems to be a bug in qxl with a specific
thing that test
On 09. 11. 21 20:31, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=78586013
I kicked off a new build just now to see if it's repeatable:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=78587217
See https://status.fedoraproject.org/ -- there is a Koji outag
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=78586013
I kicked off a new build just now to see if it's repeatable:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=78587217
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 5:53 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 14:06 +0100, Peter Boy wrote:
> > While updating right after installation of Fedora Server 35 today I get:
> >
> > > [...]# sudo dnf update
> > > ...
> > > Cleanup : glibc-langpack-de-2.34-7.fc35.x86_64
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 02:06:54PM +0100, Peter Boy wrote:
> While updating right after installation of Fedora Server 35 today I get:
>
> > [...]# sudo dnf update
> > ...
> > Cleanup : glibc-langpack-de-2.34-7.fc35.x86_64
> > 303/306
> > Cleanup : glib
Hi Adam,
I didn't install any update, apparently the update is already included with
the release version of Fedora 35, because it won't install from the command
line and the versions from the build match the versions from the release.
This is a fresh installation of Fedora 35 Workstation, done the
On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 14:06 +0100, Peter Boy wrote:
> While updating right after installation of Fedora Server 35 today I get:
>
> > [...]# sudo dnf update
> > ...
> > Cleanup : glibc-langpack-de-2.34-7.fc35.x86_64
> > 303/306
> > Cleanup : glibc-gconv
On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 16:56 +0100, Michael J. Baars wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 15:31 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 09/11/2021 14:18, Michael J. Baars wrote:
> > > Nothing with 'sudo dnf upgrade --advisory=FEDORA-2021-4ce970eca6' either.
> > > It keeps saying: "Nothing to do"???
On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 18:03 +0200, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> Michael J. Baars kirjoitti 9.11.2021 klo 17.56:
> > On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 15:31 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > > On 09/11/2021 14:18, Michael J. Baars wrote:
> > > > Nothing with 'sudo dnf upgrade --advisory=FEDORA-2021-4ce970e
Hi,
This update can't be installed because the update is already in the Fedora 35
release version, according to
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4ce970eca6.
I still have the dancing mouse pointer and cursor though :(
I'll place a notice of this on
https://bugzilla.redhat.co
Michael J. Baars kirjoitti 9.11.2021 klo 17.56:
On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 15:31 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 09/11/2021 14:18, Michael J. Baars wrote:
Nothing with 'sudo dnf upgrade --advisory=FEDORA-2021-4ce970eca6' either. It keeps
saying: "Nothing to do"???
sudo dnf upgrade --ref
On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 15:31 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 09/11/2021 14:18, Michael J. Baars wrote:
> > Nothing with 'sudo dnf upgrade --advisory=FEDORA-2021-4ce970eca6' either.
> > It keeps saying: "Nothing to do"???
>
> sudo dnf upgrade --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2021-4ce970eca6
Hello all,
I'm the current maintainer for the python-bsddb3.
Recently, it FTBFS in Rawhide [1], and the upstream now considers it
deprecated [2], replaced with the `berkeleydb` python package.
[1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019310
[2]: https://www.jcea.es/programacion/pybsddb.ht
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel writes:
> On 08/11/2021 16:47, Andreas Schneider wrote:
>> I have electron building offline for Fedora, you can find it here:
>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/network:im:signal/nodejs-electron
>
> Electron core packaging is a quite trivial task (Arch Linux and D
kevin wrote:
> I think it's because you only see deltas from N to N+1 now and before
> you saw deltas from N to N+X before. So, I think if we made it somehow
> create older deltas, you would again see better savings. The issue
> doesn't just cause there to be fewer deltas, but it also causes thos
On 09/11/2021 14:18, Michael J. Baars wrote:
Nothing with 'sudo dnf upgrade --advisory=FEDORA-2021-4ce970eca6' either. It keeps
saying: "Nothing to do"???
sudo dnf upgrade --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2021-4ce970eca6
--enablerepo=updates-testing
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycod
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora Source-git SIG on 2021-11-10 from 14:30:00 to 15:30:00 GMT
At meet.google.com/mic-otnv-kse
The meeting will be about:
Bi-weekly meeting of the Fedora source-git SIG
Agenda:
https://pagure.io/fedora-source-git/sig/issues?tags=meeting&s
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora Source-git SIG on 2021-11-10 from 14:30:00 to 15:30:00 GMT
At meet.google.com/mic-otnv-kse
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Fedora source-git SIG
Agenda:
https://pagure.io/fedora-source-git/sig/issues?tags=meeting&status=Open
On 11/9/21 7:46 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 04:39, Rajeesh K V wrote:
>>
I remember seeing 60-70% reduction really often, and 90+ periodically.
I've
read Kevin's explanation of why it's not working as well now, but I wonder
what changed between the
On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 13:00 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 10:13 AM Michael J. Baars
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've been working with Fedora for years now, and I just installed the
> > newest Fedora Workstation 35 on one of my computers.
> >
> > Since I use gedit a lo
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 8/192 (x86_64), 73/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211108.n.0):
ID: 1058419 Test: x86_64 universal install_shrink_ntfs
URL: https://o
While updating right after installation of Fedora Server 35 today I get:
> [...]# sudo dnf update
> ...
> Cleanup : glibc-langpack-de-2.34-7.fc35.x86_64
> 303/306
> Cleanup : glibc-gconv-extra-2.34-7.fc35.x86_64
> 304/306
> Runnin
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 8:42 AM Aleksei Bavshin
wrote:
> A module can load a firmware binary with the `request_firmware` API at
> any moment of it's lifetime. Usually, this happens when the module is
> initialized or discovers a new supported device, but I don't believe
> that is a strictly enforc
On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 04:39, Rajeesh K V wrote:
>
> > > I remember seeing 60-70% reduction really often, and 90+ periodically.
> > > I've
> > > read Kevin's explanation of why it's not working as well now, but I wonder
> > > what changed between the early implementation when results were very go
On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 13:00 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 10:13 AM Michael J. Baars
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've been working with Fedora for years now, and I just installed the
> > newest Fedora Workstation 35 on one of my computers.
> >
> > Since I use gedit a lo
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 7:22 AM Mamoru TASAKA
wrote:
> Kaleb Keithley wrote on 2021/11/09 21:14:
> > I'm trying to do a scratch build but not getting python3-devel installed.
> >
> > The .spec file has BR: python3-devel, and rpm -qp --requires on the
> > .src.rpm shows it has the needed Requires:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211108.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211109.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:5
Upgraded packages: 90
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 123.44 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 13:00 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 10:13 AM Michael J. Baars
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've been working with Fedora for years now, and I just installed the
> > newest Fedora Workstation 35 on one of my computers.
> >
> > Since I use gedit a lo
Kaleb Keithley wrote on 2021/11/09 21:14:
I'm trying to do a scratch build but not getting python3-devel installed.
The .spec file has BR: python3-devel, and rpm -qp --requires on the
.src.rpm shows it has the needed Requires: python3-devel.
E.g. https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6
I'm trying to do a scratch build but not getting python3-devel installed.
The .spec file has BR: python3-devel, and rpm -qp --requires on the
.src.rpm shows it has the needed Requires: python3-devel.
E.g. https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6036/78546036/root.log
Regular builds of the
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 10:13 AM Michael J. Baars
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've been working with Fedora for years now, and I just installed the newest
> Fedora Workstation 35 on one of my computers.
>
> Since I use gedit a lot for editing source codes, gedit was one of the first
> programs I tried
Hi Mikel,
Good to know! I would otherwise have downgraded to Fedora 34. Now I don't
have to find out for myself the hard way that that wouldn't have been very
much of a solution.
I will try one of the Gnome mailing lists as well, see if we can find some
people that are able to fix this.
Best reg
Hi Mischa,
Hau idatzi du Michael J. Baars (mjbaars1977.fedora.de...@gmail.com)
erabiltzaileak (2021 aza. 9, ar. (10:14)):
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've been working with Fedora for years now, and I just installed the newest
> Fedora Workstation 35 on one of my computers.
>
> Since I use gedit a lot for ed
Hi Fedora users, developers, and friends!
It's time to start thinking about Test Days for Fedora 36.
For anyone who isn't aware, a Test Day is an event usually focused
around IRC for interaction and a Wiki page for instructions and results,
with the aim being to get a bunch of interested users an
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:14:25AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 08/11/2021 22:24, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > And I think that's a*good* thing: JSON might not be perfect — because
> > nothing is —, but it's certainly one of the better designed generic
> > data formats around, and
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211108.0):
ID: 1057799 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
* Vít Ondruch:
> Or maybe I just don't understand how the side-tag is going to be
> used. Will there be some modifications necessary for some packages
> (except those already listed)?
The modifications can go directly into rawhide because they are
compatible with older compilers. But at least in
* Kevin Fenzi:
> Isn't this an ideal use case for copr?
I don't know. I could piece together the Koji API fairly easily, and
had hoped to reuse some of the script logic.
Or does COPR have direct support this? Can I tell it directly to report
rawhide in a special buildroot? Is there a programm
> > I remember seeing 60-70% reduction really often, and 90+ periodically. I've
> > read Kevin's explanation of why it's not working as well now, but I wonder
> > what changed between the early implementation when results were very good
> > and now, when they really aren't.
>
> I think it's becaus
Dne 09. 11. 21 v 10:14 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel napsal(a):
On 08/11/2021 22:24, Lennart Poettering wrote:
And I think that's a*good* thing: JSON might not be perfect — because
nothing is —, but it's certainly one of the better designed generic
data formats around, and it's complexity is absolu
On 08/11/2021 16:47, Andreas Schneider wrote:
I have electron building offline for Fedora, you can find it here:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/network:im:signal/nodejs-electron
Electron core packaging is a quite trivial task (Arch Linux and Debian
have already done this), but what ab
On 08/11/2021 17:19, Alexander Bulimov wrote:
The plan is to maintain it with Davide's help, and provide regular
updates as the Time Appliance project is in the very active phase now.
Hello and welcome to Fedora.
Please follow this instructions:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-mai
On 08/11/2021 22:24, Lennart Poettering wrote:
And I think that's a*good* thing: JSON might not be perfect — because
nothing is —, but it's certainly one of the better designed generic
data formats around, and it's complexity is absolutely managable.
What about YAML?
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Za
Dne 08. 11. 21 v 21:39 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 02:06:43PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
I would like to create a long-running rawhide side tag for preparing
Fedora for the removal of implicit function declarations from the GCC
defaults. This is a change that happened in t
Hi All,
I've been working with Fedora for years now, and I just installed the newest
Fedora Workstation 35 on one of my computers.
Since I use gedit a lot for editing source codes, gedit was one of the first
programs I tried to launch. Now, there I get into trouble. After opening a few
source f
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211108.0):
ID: 1057790 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1057790
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
On 11/8/21 22:36, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
In the recent discussion about saving space (in the ELF thread) there
poped up linux-firmware topic several time. Let's kick it off as
separate thread.
I have several question and I am unable to find the answer for them.
1. How do I find which firmware
61 matches
Mail list logo
