I think Björn Persson’s concerns are reasonable. Hopefully they can be
easily addressed, since I would be happy to see this change implemented.
At least six packages I maintain or regularly contribute to could be
simplified.
I spot-checked a libtool .la file to see what typical contents looked
Hello,
does somebody know how to contact Peter Gordon? I am aware that my request
is for EPEL, but I would be even happy to maintain the EPEL branches myself
in case of a negative response.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1990157
I also filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20211021.0):
ID: 1048997 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1048997
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests comple
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Why would anyone want to do that? (I'm not talking about the case
> mentioned elsewhere in the thread were a non-libtool file is removed
> by a mistake, but the actual case where one would want to keep
> distributing a libtool file.)
The kdelibs3 plugin loader
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 02:51:49PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> This has happened to me twice today, it gets rejected the first time and
> then works:
snip...
>
> Anyone else seeing this?
One other report: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10301
Not sure whats going on there yet,
This has happened to me twice today, it gets rejected the first time and
then works:
$ git merge f35 && git push && fedpkg build --nowait
Updating 93320b4..b127b9e
Fast-forward
.gitignore | 2 ++
OpenImageIO.spec | 44 +++-
sources | 2 +-
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 07:37:27PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> These are reasonable examples that demonstrate how developers and
> users could benefit from the change proposal. Could more things like
> this be added to:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Package_infor
On 01/11/2021 14:37, Ben Cotton wrote:
Autools/libtool-based projects frequently install files ending in
`.la` in their `make install`. These files are usually unwanted. Many
projects therefore end up with a variation of `find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-name "*.la" -delete` in their `%install section`.
+
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/45 (x86_64)
ID: 1048656 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_fprint
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1048656
ID: 1048667 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1048
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 09:37:40AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> == Summary ==
> Autools/libtool-based projects frequently install files ending in
> `.la` in their `make install`. These files are usually unwanted. Many
> projects therefore end up with a variation of `find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> -name "*.la
> Pull request implementing `%__brp_remove_la_files` in the upstream rpm
> repository: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1674
This looks like it risks deleting more files than intended. If some
package uses country codes or domain names in filenames, then this
change could silent
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 09:37:42AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> == Dependencies ==
> Around 2000 packages will need attendance (that is aprox 1/3 of time
> of jdk11 bump, but It seems, that 1100 packages remained on jdk8)
> $ repoquery -q --whatrequires java-headless |wc -l
> 1007
> $ repoquery -q
OpenImageIO (the only consumer I can find) has recently depreciated support
as OpenVDB has long since supplied the equivalent functionality.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le.
V Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 02:50:27PM +, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
> There are quite a few of these "junk files" left around by build systems
> that many packages have to remove:
>
> - .packlist (Perl)
>
These are actually useful for a few Perl tools which need to enumarate
installed CPAN di
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 2/206 (x86_64), 7/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fe
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 11:17:52AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
The latest dramatically-named fancy-website infosec thing is called "Trojan
Source". See https://www.trojansource.codes/ if you want to marvel at the
presentation, complete with ominous hacker hex codes and rolling fog over
dark wate
The latest dramatically-named fancy-website infosec thing is called "Trojan
Source". See https://www.trojansource.codes/ if you want to marvel at the
presentation, complete with ominous hacker hex codes and rolling fog over
dark water.
It's not really a vulnerability in the traditional sense, but
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 09:37:40AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveLaFiles
>
> == Summary ==
> Autools/libtool-based projects frequently install files ending in
> `.la` in their `make install`. These files are usually unwanted. Many
> projects therefore end
Hello!
Will miss the meeting today, as i will be at my new $Dayjob
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 6:10 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> # Date: 2021-11-01
> # Time: 15:00 UTC
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
> # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java17
== Summary ==
Update the system JDK in Fedora from java-11-openjdk to java-17-openjdk.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:jvanek| Jiri Vanek]]
* Email:
* Product: java and java stack
* Responsible WG: java-sig (java and java-maint)(which no longer exists)
*
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveLaFiles
== Summary ==
Autools/libtool-based projects frequently install files ending in
`.la` in their `make install`. These files are usually unwanted. Many
projects therefore end up with a variation of `find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-name "*.la" -delete` in th
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211031.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211101.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 31
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
>
> Am 01.11.2021 um 11:04 schrieb Jiri Vanek :
>
> Hello!
>
> For wide hearing/reading, before final announcement,
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java17 have anybody any opinion or
> anything to say for/against?
>
I welcome the update as useful for development and testing, as long
On 10/30/21 10:59, Adrian Reber wrote:
I made all builds in copr
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/adrian/protobuf-3-19/packages/
and it seems all packages that were rebuilt for 3.18.1 are also
rebuilding against 3.19.0.
Thanks for doing this work, Adrian!
--
Major Hayden
OpenPGP_0x7
Hello!
For wide hearing/reading, before final announcement,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java17 have anybody any opinion or
anything to say for/against?
Happy Hacking,
J.
--
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA Software Engineer
Red Hat Inc.
+420 775 39 01 09
_
There is nothing on the agenda, and it's also a holiday in parts of
Europe, so let's skip today's meeting.
= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =
#2679 F36 Change: Retired Packages
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2679
APPROVED (+4, 0, 0)
#2673 Nonresponsive maintainer: beckerde
https://pagure.io/f
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211031.0):
ID: 1047936 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211031.0):
ID: 1047920 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211031.0):
ID: 1047904 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
29 matches
Mail list logo
