On Sun, 2021-10-31 at 22:56 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 10:44 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello team,
> >
> > ImageMagick is updated 6.9.12.28 on Rawhide and got side tag as
> > 35-build-side-47231.
>
> Sorry, I am confused. Did you mean to say the update a
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 10:44 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
>
> Hello team,
>
> ImageMagick is updated 6.9.12.28 on Rawhide and got side tag as
> 35-build-side-47231.
Sorry, I am confused. Did you mean to say the update and rebuilds for
rawhide are *finished* and you're starting the process for f35
Hello team,
ImageMagick is updated 6.9.12.28 on Rawhide and got side tag as
35-build-side-47231. For my understanding, the following packages
(including those from RPM Fusion) may need a rebuild based on these
dependencies:
`dnf repoquery --whatrequires "libMagick*" --qf "%{reponame}
%{sou
On 10/31/21 04:57, Julian Sikorski wrote:
I had some time today so I decided to try updating to F35 ahead of the
release. It did not work unfortunately:
Error:
Problem 2: problem with installed package pam_mount-2.16-12.fc34.x86_64
- package pam_mount-2.16-12.fc34.x86_64 requires cryptsetu
On 2021-10-28 00:15, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 28/10/2021 à 08:33, l...@fedoraproject.org a écrit :
On 2021-10-27 10:21 a.m., "Antonio T. sagitter"
wrote:
Use a side-tag
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Update_Guide/#multiple_packages),
please.
Done. '''
Sid
On 2021-10-31 10:14, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 5:37 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
On 2021-10-21 02:01, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Have you managed to get this to work, or what is the particular issue?
Fonts SIG helped resolve the issue. You can view the updated spec files
b
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20211019.0):
ID: 1047829 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1047829
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests comple
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 5:37 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-10-21 02:01, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > Have you managed to get this to work, or what is the particular issue?
> >
> Fonts SIG helped resolve the issue. You can view the updated spec files
> below:
>
> https://src.fedoraprojec
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2021-11-01
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat
Greetings testers!
Now Fedora 35 validation is (finally) behind us, let's check in on
status, and get the 36 cycle going.
On Sat, 2021-10-30 at 22:52 +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> Am Samstag, dem 30.10.2021 um 22:00 +0200 schrieb Alexander Ploumistos:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm wondering if there's an "elegant" and "rpm" way to do the
> > following, without calling an external tool (and maybe adding another
> >
On 2021-10-21 02:01, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Have you managed to get this to work, or what is the particular issue?
Fonts SIG helped resolve the issue. You can view the updated spec files
below:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/julietaula-montserrat-fonts/blob/rawhide/f/julietaula-montserr
On Sun, 2021-10-31 at 14:50 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 20.10.2021 o 20:09, Julian Sikorski pisze:
> > W dniu 29.09.2021 o 10:08, Julian Sikorski pisze:
> > > W dniu 28.09.2021 o 09:32, Julian Sikorski pisze:
> > > > W dniu 22.09.2021 o 21:07, Julian Sikorski pisze:
> > > > > Am 22.09.21
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 5/206 (x86_64), 8/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fe
W dniu 20.10.2021 o 20:09, Julian Sikorski pisze:
W dniu 29.09.2021 o 10:08, Julian Sikorski pisze:
W dniu 28.09.2021 o 09:32, Julian Sikorski pisze:
W dniu 22.09.2021 o 21:07, Julian Sikorski pisze:
Am 22.09.21 um 19:38 schrieb Fabio Valentini:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 6:35 PM Julian Sikorski
W dniu 31.10.2021 o 12:57, Julian Sikorski pisze:
Hello,
I had some time today so I decided to try updating to F35 ahead of the
release. It did not work unfortunately:
Error:
Problem 1: package
mupen64plus-qt-1.12-1.20200226git1709647.fc31.x86_64 requires
libquazip5.so.1()(64bit), but non
On 10/31/21 12:57, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Hello,
I had some time today so I decided to try updating to F35 ahead of the
release. It did not work unfortunately:
Error:
Problem 1: package
mupen64plus-qt-1.12-1.20200226git1709647.fc31.x86_64 requires
libquazip5.so.1()(64bit), but none of the
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211030.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211031.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 37
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 575.28 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Hello,
I had some time today so I decided to try updating to F35 ahead of the
release. It did not work unfortunately:
Error:
Problem 1: package
mupen64plus-qt-1.12-1.20200226git1709647.fc31.x86_64 requires
libquazip5.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- quazip-qt5-0
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211030.0):
ID: 1047451 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211030.0):
ID: 1047435 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211030.0):
ID: 1047419 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
21 matches
Mail list logo
