On 10/29/21 3:53 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fr, 29.10.21 13:57, David Cantrell (dcantr...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> Has there been any consideration for potential security risks with
>> regards to the data in this string? Of concern to me are encoding
>> formats, size limits or reporting, a
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 06:27:54PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Users will be able to use the newer version (2.5) of OpenLDAP, and
> > building packages with openldap-2.4 won't be available, as it won't be
> > present on the specific fedora version. This can affect 3rd partly
> > packages, which ar
On 10/27/21 05:25, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 26. 10. 21 13:53, Adrian Reber wrote:
All packages have been rebuild and the side tag has been merged. I was
not able to rebuild the following packages:
* bear
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017733
* community-mysql
https://bugzill
* Ben Cotton [19/10/2021 12:08] :
>
> == Benefit to Fedora ==
> Brings a stable and up-to-date version of OpenLDAP according to
> upsteam release. OpenLDAP 2.4 will be out of support as soon as
> OpenLDAP 2.6 is released which is planned for this year. Fedora will
> be prepared for such a step.
Si
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 12:09 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> == User Experience ==
> Users will be able to use the newer version (2.5) of OpenLDAP, and
> building packages with openldap-2.4 won't be available, as it won't be
> present on the specific fedora version. This can affect 3rd partly
> packages
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 09:53:25PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fr, 29.10.21 13:57, David Cantrell (dcantr...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > Has there been any consideration for potential security risks with
> > regards to the data in this string? Of concern to me are encoding
> > formats, siz
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 06:39:38PM -, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> It depends on how wide of a net you cast. Since package naming is
> user-controlled and distribution-wide rules are enforced by disparate
> build systems and environments, an NVR (or NEVRA) is not unique. It's
> close to unique
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 4:00 PM Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> On Fr, 29.10.21 14:09, David Cantrell (dcantr...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > > the information may be useful: maybe the software is in an older
> > > version that you don't support, or maybe the bug was already fixed in
> > > a later versi
On Fr, 29.10.21 14:09, David Cantrell (dcantr...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > the information may be useful: maybe the software is in an older
> > version that you don't support, or maybe the bug was already fixed in
> > a later version, etc.
> >
> > That said, for Fedora official builds, package NVR is
On Fr, 29.10.21 13:57, David Cantrell (dcantr...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Has there been any consideration for potential security risks with
> regards to the data in this string? Of concern to me are encoding
> formats, size limits or reporting, and structure formats. The
> proposal notes JSON, whic
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/204 (x86_64), 3/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20211028.n.1):
ID: 1046247 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso anaconda_help
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1046247
ID: 1046323 Test: aarch64 S
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 11/141 (aarch64), 4/206 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211028.n.1):
ID: 1045933 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_btr
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 06:39:38PM -, Luca Boccassi wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 07:26:47PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
2) The proposal is built around using the package NVR to indicate
where it came from. But those names aren't unique. In some cases
it'll work, but in cases
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 07:37:27PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 12:10:15PM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 07:26:47PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 03:09:00PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
>>https://fedorap
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 09:30:18PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Do, 28.10.21 12:10, David Cantrell (dcantr...@redhat.com) wrote:
Thanks for revising the change proposal and filling in more details.
After reading through it, I have some questions:
1) The proposal notes that users tend to
Congratulations to the Fedora developers and to the team assigned to
deliver a fantastic product.
A special hats off to Mr Q/A, a fellow Canadian for really, under time
stress, insuring a clean quality distro.
For those not in the know, he also does Q/A for the spins.
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 8:42 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 09:32:16PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> > Daniel P. Berrangé wrote on 2021/10/29 21:15:
> > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 07:55:08AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 6:52 AM Richard W.M. J
OLD: Fedora-35-20211028.n.1
NEW: Fedora-35-20211029.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 8:00 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Company internal only is a rarity these days with cloud deployments
> and people putting Alexa's and similar devices on the company
> internet. That 'smart fridge' in the company workroom or 'smart tv' in
> the executive lounge is both
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 09:32:16PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé wrote on 2021/10/29 21:15:
> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 07:55:08AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 6:52 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:16:42AM
Hi Everyone,
We are working on moving OpenJDK 17 as the system runtime for Fedora:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java17
Since, like last time we did something similar, the change may have a
somewhat large impact, especially on other packages, we would like to
collect some feedback about
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote on 2021/10/29 21:15:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 07:55:08AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 6:52 AM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:16:42AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
Perfect. Thank you Mamoru-san.
armv7hl is now back in.
g
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211028.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211029.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 22
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 72.84 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 07:55:08AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 6:52 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:16:42AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > >
> > > Perfect. Thank you Mamoru-san.
> > >
> > > armv7hl is now back in.
> >
> > glusterfs libr
On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 at 01:53, Ian Kent wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 10:41 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 10:28 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > > Stephen John Smoogen writes:
> > >
> > > > Mainly because it is the authentication service equivalent of
> > > > telnet**. Ve
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 6:52 AM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:16:42AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> >
> > Perfect. Thank you Mamoru-san.
> >
> > armv7hl is now back in.
>
> glusterfs library is totally broken on armv7, aarch64, s390x at the moment:
>
Are you saying it w
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:16:42AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
> Perfect. Thank you Mamoru-san.
>
> armv7hl is now back in.
glusterfs library is totally broken on armv7, aarch64, s390x at the moment:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2018439
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualizati
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:01 AM Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-10-28 17:02, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-10-26 at 16:42 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> >> Hello team,
> >>
> >>I would like to let you know ImageMagick-6.9.12-26 recently landed
> >> upstream.
> > Hello , when
On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 23:33 -0700, l...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-10-27 10:21 a.m., "Antonio T. sagitter"
> wrote:
> > Use a side-tag
> > (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Update_Guide/#multiple_packages
> > ),
> > please.
>
> Done.
> '''
> Side ta
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211028.0):
ID: 1045437 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 2021-10-28 17:02, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Tue, 2021-10-26 at 16:42 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hello team,
I would like to let you know ImageMagick-6.9.12-26 recently landed
upstream.
Hello , when you update from 6.9.11 to 6.9.12, we need rebuild all
depended packages because we got
On 2021-10-28 00:10, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 27/10/2021 à 01:42, Luya Tshimbalanga a écrit :
Hello team,
I would like to let you know ImageMagick-6.9.12-26 recently landed
upstream.
Learning from the previous experiences, I or my co-maintainer are
planning to commit and build this package fo
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211028.0):
ID: 1045414 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_service_manipulation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1045414
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_6
33 matches
Mail list logo
