On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 01:04:42PM -, Maxwell Huang-Hobbs wrote:
> I'm Maxwell Huang-Hobbs. I've been using fedora as my daily
> driver since 2015-ish and want to contribute to packaging.
Welcome!
> The thing that's spurring me to jump in now is a bugfix in
> xserver 1.20.12 [1] which isn't y
Hi!
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 01:40:35PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-10-20 at 18:39 +0200, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote:
[...]
> > AIUI, we made the change to use iptables-nft as the default with F32. We
> > also decided that existing iptables-legacy users shouldn't be moved to
> >
I have started the process of updating lttng-ust to 2.13 in rawhide
which implies a soname bump of liblttng-ust to 1 and liblttng-ust-ctl to 5.
From what I understand, the following packages will need to be rebuilt:
libcamera
mir-server-libs
These packages might also be impacted:
ceph-base
do
On Wed, 2021-10-20 at 18:39 +0200, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote:
> Resurrecting this old thread.
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 1:09 PM Phil Sutter wrote:
>
> > Hi Neal,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 06:44:22AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 5:15 AM Phil Sutter wrote:
> >
I'd like to say the test day/week has been a huge success. We had reported
results from 15 participants and found the following issues/docs updates:
- FCOS with 5.14+ kernel fails to boot on xen instances
- https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/997
- kargs: interactive change
On 10/14/21 18:30, Peter Boy wrote:
A default installation of Fedora Server Edition occupies about 2.2 GiB of
storage and consumes 505 MiB of Ram. An absolute minimum might be 2 G RAM and 5
G storage
This pretty much would require a reinstall on upgrade, because during
the regular upgrade th
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 9/141 (aarch64), 4/204 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20211019.n.0):
ID: 1035188 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso
server_role_deploy_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1035188
ID: 1035196
W dniu 29.09.2021 o 10:08, Julian Sikorski pisze:
W dniu 28.09.2021 o 09:32, Julian Sikorski pisze:
W dniu 22.09.2021 o 21:07, Julian Sikorski pisze:
Am 22.09.21 um 19:38 schrieb Fabio Valentini:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 6:35 PM Julian Sikorski
wrote:
W dniu 21.09.2021 o 23:12, Richard W.M.
>> The Change proposal is not very clear in this regard… Please correct me
> if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that there's a giant SRPM which
> produces a giant 'ansible' binary package. In addition there's a second
> small SRPM which produces the 'ansible-core' binary package.
>
> Right:
>
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20211019.0):
ID: 1035383 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1035383
ID: 1035403
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 11/206 (x86_64), 6/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in F
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 03:06:21PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've been trying to build gcc in rawhide and f35 for more than a week now,
> but haven't succeeded due to instability of the armv7hl builders.
> E.g. the
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=77117620
> build
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 06:24:21AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> FWIW, I think the upstream renaming of ansible and ansible-core is something
> that we just have to accept. But we have some flexibility in how this is
> packaged in Fedora.
...snip...
>
> The Change proposal is not ver
Resurrecting this old thread.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 1:09 PM Phil Sutter wrote:
> Hi Neal,
>
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 06:44:22AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 5:15 AM Phil Sutter wrote:
> [...]
> > > Yes, firewalld depends on 'iptables'. My big question is how to make
>
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 7/141 (aarch64), 4/204 (x86_64)
ID: 1034504 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1034504
ID: 1034621 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedor
Hi, I'm wondering if there are any people near Ottawa who I could meet or hang
out with?
--
Regards,
Gregory Cohen
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
In accordance with the grand tradition, we will hold the F35 Go/No-Go
meeting[1] on Thursday 21 October at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting.
At this time, we will determine the status of the F35 Final for the 26
October target date #1 milestone[2]. For more information about the
Go/No-Go meeting, see t
OLD: Fedora-35-20211019.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20211020.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 03:22:13PM +0200, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> I asked this in another thread, but maybe this is related to [1]? How
> do we disable just link-time parallelism?
gcc uses its --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --enable-link-serialization=1
when building gcc with LTO is enabled and the
On Wed, 2021-10-20 at 15:22 +0200, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
I asked this in another thread, but maybe this is related to [1]? How
do we disable just link-time parallelism?
[1]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/c/bc8fa85e907d4b2b88760da8d23c9e17663c44fa?branch=rawhide
https://lists.fe
Hi All,
There have been some reports of phishing emails claiming to be from the
fedora project. An example of which can be seen here:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10286
As always please be careful and follow basic guidelines when reading
your emails.
- Do not click on links o
I asked this in another thread, but maybe this is related to [1]? How
do we disable just link-time parallelism?
[1]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/c/bc8fa85e907d4b2b88760da8d23c9e17663c44fa?branch=rawhide
On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 at 15:15, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I've
Hi!
I've been trying to build gcc in rawhide and f35 for more than a week now,
but haven't succeeded due to instability of the armv7hl builders.
E.g. the
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=77117620
build succeeded on all but armv7hl in less than 22 hours (on aarch64
even took less
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 2:24 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> FWIW, I think the upstream renaming of ansible and ansible-core is something
> that we just have to accept. But we have some flexibility in how this is
> packaged in Fedora.
>
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 09:34:34PM -, David M
Dne 19. 10. 21 v 18:30 Micah Shennum napsal(a):
and when I manually run "wireplumber" it shows:
Default Sink: alsa_output.pci-_00_1b.0.analog-stereo
Default Source: alsa_input.pci-_00_1b.0.analog-stereo
and the devices appear in KDE and I can play a sound.
I had similar issues on m
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211019.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211020.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 70
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 979.87 KiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211019.0):
ID: 1034677 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2
base_service_manipulation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1034677
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 35 Candidate RC-1.1 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the curr
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 3:08 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > There seems to be some inconsistency with how our update workflow
> > currently works. When an update gets enough positive karma "pre-push"
> > (still in "pending → testing" state) so that it can be pushed
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211019.0):
ID: 1034313 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
30 matches
Mail list logo
