On Monday, October 18, 2021, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Is it worth paying hundreds of MBytes of installer space, and the new
> 2 GB minimum RAM to simply install Fedora? I'm not saying "discard
> anaconda". I'm saying "be aware of some very real reasons the
> installer has gotten so huge". And k
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 3:36 PM Chris Murphy
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021, 10:01 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The Fedora 34 netinst image is still 450 times the size of a floppy!
>>
>> The top two reasons for this: a significant portion of anacond
It has been 5 months and sadly the github pulls haven't been done yet. Sadly.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.o
I think an important question we should ask is who is the target user we're
thinking about when we consider 'recommendations'. I used to have a pretty
clear picture of what 'recommended/required' meant, and then I did some
charity/volunteer work in Namibia back in the early 2000s and realized that
Is it worth paying hundreds of MBytes of installer space, and the new
2 GB minimum RAM to simply install Fedora? I'm not saying "discard
anaconda". I'm saying "be aware of some very real reasons the
installer has gotten so huge". And keep it in mind for your own
projects.
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 4
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 5:27 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> Got this failure, which includes:
> https://osci-jenkins-1.ci.fedoraproject.org/job/fedora-ci/job/rpminspect-pipeline/job/master/49313/testReport/(root)/tests/_annocheck/
>
> Hardened: /usr/bin/icebreaker: FAIL: pie test because not built w
Got this failure, which includes:
https://osci-jenkins-1.ci.fedoraproject.org/job/fedora-ci/job/rpminspect-pipeline/job/master/49313/testReport/(root)/tests/_annocheck/
Hardened: /usr/bin/icebreaker: FAIL: pie test because not built with '-Wl,-pie'
(gcc/clang) or '-buildmode pie' (go)
Now, my m
On Sunday, October 17, 2021 3:05:13 PM CDT Dan Čermák wrote:
> They are also much more intuitive to use for your average user/ newcomer
> to Linux in contrast to a text interface (which will put them off when
> compared to the Windows or Ubuntu installer). Yes, a text interface is
> much more resou
Nico Kadel-Garcia writes:
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 3:36 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021, 10:01 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I still remember how Red Hat Linux and (IIRC) Fedora Core 1 could be booted
>>> from a floppy (older Red Hat Linux release
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 3:36 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021, 10:01 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I still remember how Red Hat Linux and (IIRC) Fedora Core 1 could be booted
>> from a floppy (older Red Hat Linux releases even had a fully functioning
>> rescue
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021, 10:01 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>
> I still remember how Red Hat Linux and (IIRC) Fedora Core 1 could be
> booted
> from a floppy (older Red Hat Linux releases even had a fully functioning
> rescue mode on the floppy, later ones could
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 12:13:04PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Since I've been a packager for more than 10 years I should know this but
> TBH, I've never really paid a whole lot of attention to the infra side of
> things.
>
> So with the F35 beta process ongoing, would it be best to not build
> p
Since I've been a packager for more than 10 years I should know this but
TBH, I've never really paid a whole lot of attention to the infra side of
things.
So with the F35 beta process ongoing, would it be best to not build
packages for <= f35?
Depending on how long the freeze lasts it's possible
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/204 (x86_64), 11/132 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20211016.n.1):
ID: 1031266 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1031266
ID: 1031359 Test: aarch64 Ser
OLD: Fedora-35-20211016.n.1
NEW: Fedora-35-20211017.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 1
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 4/206 (x86_64), 8/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211016.n.1):
ID: 1030926 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20211015.0):
ID: 1031172 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1031172
ID: 1031192
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 10:08 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Steve Grubb wrote:
> > I'd like to suggest making libcurl-minimal very minimal for security
> > reasons. The main curl package has many security issues (CVE's)
> > constantly. But usually, the problem
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211016.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211017.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 13
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211015.0):
ID: 1030794 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 11:43:32AM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> > > #2 - In F34 Gnome control center -> battery I could choose the
> > > laptops power profile (performance, balanced, powersave). This
> > > seems to
> > > be gone.
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Power_Profiles_
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211016.0):
ID: 1030778 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
22 matches
Mail list logo
