Re: Package owner required for ImageMagick

On 10/14/21 11:17 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: Also note that ImageMagick is in the unusual position of not actually being upgraded to the latest version. One of the first things that you'll probably want to look at is upgrading it to ImageMagick 7.x. ImageMagick 6.x is not maintained upstream as far as

Re: F37 Change: Ansible 5 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 07:44:12PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 7:29 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 4:32 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ansible5 > > > > > > == Summary == > > > > > > The ansible pro

Re: ImageMagick update

Cool. What packages don't use the 7? This is from 2017, anything new since then? https://legacy.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?t=32622 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lis

Re: ImageMagick update

On Sat, 2021-10-16 at 06:39 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Michael Catanzaro wrote on 2021/10/16 0:37: > > On Fri, Oct 15 2021 at 10:22:36 AM +0200, Remi Collet < > > fed...@famillecollet.com> wrote: > > > Sorry, but such update, with soname change is not acceptable in > > > stable > > > branches. >

Re: ImageMagick update

On 2021-10-15 08:37, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Fri, Oct 15 2021 at 10:22:36 AM +0200, Remi Collet wrote: Sorry, but such update, with soname change is not acceptable in stable branches. Hi Luya, Please note that soname changes are allowed in rawhide only after a one-week notice period. S

[Test-Announce] 2021-10-18 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 35 Blocker Review Meeting

# F35 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2021-10-18 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat Hi folks! We have 6 proposed Final blockers and 2 proposed Final freeze exceptions to review, so let's have a review meeting on Monday. If you have time this weekend, you can ta

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2021-10-18 Fedora QA Meeting

[re-send with correct date, sorry] Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't have much for the agenda, and we're in F35 Final crunch mode ATM. There will be a blocker review meeting. If you're aware of anything it would be useful to discuss this week, please do reply to

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2021-10-11 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't have much for the agenda, and we're in F35 Final crunch mode ATM. There will be a blocker review meeting. If you're aware of anything it would be useful to discuss this week, please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and ru

Re: F37 Change: Ansible 5 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 7:29 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 4:32 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ansible5 > > > > == Summary == > > > > The ansible project has re-organized how they release and distribute > > ansible. This change moves

Re: F37 Change: Ansible 5 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 4:32 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ansible5 > > == Summary == > > The ansible project has re-organized how they release and distribute > ansible. This change moves Fedora to be in sync with those changes and > retires the old 'ansible class

Re: ImageMagick update

Michael Catanzaro wrote on 2021/10/16 0:37: On Fri, Oct 15 2021 at 10:22:36 AM +0200, Remi Collet wrote: Sorry, but such update, with soname change is not acceptable in stable branches. Hi Luya, Please note that soname changes are allowed in rawhide only after a one-week notice period. Sin

Re: F37 Change: Ansible 5 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

The subject is wrong. This Change proposal is for Fedora Linux *36*. Whoops! -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

F37 Change: Ansible 5 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ansible5 == Summary == The ansible project has re-organized how they release and distribute ansible. This change moves Fedora to be in sync with those changes and retires the old 'ansible classic/2.9.x' package in favor of a 'ansible' package that pulls in a

FedoraRespin-34-updates-20211015.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 4/45 (x86_64) ID: 1029889 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_fprint URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029889 ID: 1029900 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029

Re: Self Introduction: Peter Kotvan

Hello, Peter! On Friday, 15 October 2021 at 00:31, Peter Kotvan wrote: [...] > The main reason I'm writing this email is that I miss a retired package ( > scrot ) in Fedora and since I > already have a copr repo with it I thought why not to go all the way

Re: Fedora Linux 35 Final blocker review summary

On Fri, 2021-10-15 at 14:04 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > Many fewer blockers than last week. Hooray! Go/No-Go for target date > #1 is Thursday. > > > Action summary > > > Accepted blockers > - > > 3. plasma-discover — Discover shows a misleading state of Flatp

Re: Fedora Linux 35 Final blocker review summary

Many fewer blockers than last week. Hooray! Go/No-Go for target date #1 is Thursday. Action summary Accepted blockers - 1. geoclue2 — time is transiently incorrect when Automatic Time Zone is enabled — MODIFIED ACTION: QA to verify FEDORA-2021-14f2ed62fd 2.

Fedora-35-20211015.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 6/141 (aarch64), 2/204 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20211014.n.0): ID: 1029362 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029362 ID: 1029503

Fedora-IoT-35-20211015.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20211014.0): ID: 1029617 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029617 ID: 1029623 Test: aarch64

guava 31.0.1 update in rawhide

Hello, In one week guava package will be updated from version 30.1 to version 31.0.1 in rawhide. The new version changes API/ABI, so an action may be required to update packages that depend on guava. Upstream release notes: https://github.com/google/guava/releases/tag/v31.0 Scratch build: https:/

Re: ImageMagick update

On Fri, Oct 15 2021 at 10:22:36 AM +0200, Remi Collet wrote: Sorry, but such update, with soname change is not acceptable in stable branches. Hi Luya, Please note that soname changes are allowed in rawhide only after a one-week notice period. Since you did not give other maintainers notice,

Non-responsive packager: kasong

Good Morning Everyone, The packager listed here has been receiving a daily email asking them to either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS matches an existing bugzilla account. Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_p

Fedora-Rawhide-20211015.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required test results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 11/141 (aarch64), 3/206 (x86_64) New failures (same test not fai

Re: crypto-policies and a certain usage of SHA-1

On Fri, Oct 15 2021 at 10:10:38 AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: My question is: Is it true that this usage of SHA-1 makes the TLS session weak, so that it's correct to forbid it in the crypto policy? Hm, I think Fedora's crypto policy should not be stricter than upstream Firefox. This should p

Re: jq issue with integer handling logic

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 11:20 AM Davide Cavalca wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 22:41 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > I've gone ahead and done it, it needs karma: > > > > * F35: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ab44a1d0c9 > > > > * F34: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/upda

Re: jq issue with integer handling logic

On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 22:41 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > I've gone ahead and done it, it needs karma: > > * F35: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ab44a1d0c9 >   > * F34: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-cdc2cb4c5a >   > * F33: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.o

Fedora-IoT-36-20211015.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 4/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20211014.0): ID: 1029558 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029558 I

Fedora 35 compose report: 20211015.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-35-20211014.n.0 NEW: Fedora-35-20211015.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 3 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: libcurl-minimal

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 12:47:44PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 16:49 +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote: > > As I understand it, Zbyszek is now proposing to make changes to other > > packages > > and/or distribution metadata in order to make (lib)curl-minimal actually > >

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20211015.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211014.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211015.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 85 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: libcurl-minimal

On Friday, October 15, 2021 12:47:44 PM CEST Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 16:49 +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote: > > > As I understand it, Zbyszek is now proposing to make changes to other > > packages and/or distribution metadata in order to make > > (lib)curl-minimal actually

Re: libcurl-minimal

Hi, On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 16:49 +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote: > As I understand it, Zbyszek is now proposing to make changes to other > packages > and/or distribution metadata in order to make (lib)curl-minimal actually used > on some Fedora installations by default. This sounds interesting. For e

Re: final link failed: memory exhausted on armv7l

On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 09:43, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 06:15, Jeff Law wrote: > > > > > > > > On 10/13/2021 10:37 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 13 2021 at 06:06:50 PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser > > > wrote: > > >> What you describe as lto requires a lot of

Re: guava 31.0.1 update in rawhide

On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 11:12, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > The new version changes API/ABI Honestly it would be more noteworthy if guava did NOT break its API/ABI ;-) -- Mat Booth http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lis

Fedora-Cloud-34-20211015.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 1028639 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028639 ID: 1028647 Test: aarch64 Cloud_B

Re: ImageMagick update

Le 15/10/2021 à 10:22, Remi Collet a écrit : This list is not complete, at least php-pecl-imagick is missing and this one is broken by recent changes... # dnf repoquery --whatrequires ImageMagick-libs ImageMagick R-magick WINGs-libs autotrace chafa converseen digikam-libs dmtx-utils dvdauthor

Re: ImageMagick update

Le 15/10/2021 à 10:05, Luya Tshimbalanga a écrit : Hello everyone, ImageMagick is now pushed to 6.9.12.25 as a long-overdue update [1] for all releases except EPEL8 branch, which I do not use (co-maintainer welcome). Affected packages below may need to rebuild: Sorry, but such update, with s

crypto-policies and a certain usage of SHA-1

Hello, I have a question for someone with deep knowledge about cryptology. The question regards Fedora's crypto policies and a certain usage of SHA-1 in TLS. I encountered a web server that Seamonkey and Firefox refuse to talk to. Both give me the error SSL_ERROR_UNSUPPORTED_SIGNATURE_ALGORITHM.

ImageMagick update

Hello everyone, ImageMagick is now pushed to 6.9.12.25 as a long-overdue update [1] for all releases except EPEL8 branch, which I do not use (co-maintainer welcome). Affected packages below may need to rebuild: NsCDE a2ps anyremote c-graph caja-image-converter chordpro-abc conky-manager darkt

Re: final link failed: memory exhausted on armv7l

On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 06:15, Jeff Law wrote: > > > > On 10/13/2021 10:37 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 13 2021 at 06:06:50 PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser > > wrote: > >> What you describe as lto requires a lot of memory is caused by building > >> lto along with non-lto in the sa

Fedora-Cloud-33-20211015.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211014.0): ID: 1028568 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: Woah! [Thanks, Nest sponsors]

Adding my thanks too, it's a great package of bits and bobs - the conference was pretty good too 🙂 - in case anybody does want to see https://twitter.com/graham_alton/status/1448564676162424832 Mine arrived to the UK yesterday. Regards and thanks again, Graham _