On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 5:48 PM Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2021-10-06 at 15:41 -0500, Joe Doss wrote:
> >
> > > Does anybody know how to fix a currently broken instance and can
> > > share
> > > their solution?
> >
> > Is there anything on the console log when you reboot it after the
On pe, 01 loka 2021, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:41 PM Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Stephen John Smoogen writes:
>> > The places I have seen it still being used are in Universities run by
>> > people who learned sysadmin in the 1990's and early 2000's. It is a
>> > light weight sy
Dne 07. 10. 21 v 18:23 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
When are you supposed to run remove-retired-packages?
After the upgrade.
If you run remove-retired-packages after the upgrade, you already managed to upgrade and nothing is broken, no?
Nothing is broken **now**. But it very often broke N+1 or
On la, 02 loka 2021, James Szinger wrote:
On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 08:42:02 -0400
Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
How many of these can be solved by tunneling everything in a WireGuard
mesh network, and using nftables rules to prevent spoofing?
Sounds harder than setting up NIS+, which was supposed to s
On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 08:18:44AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 12:46:11AM -0400, Christopher wrote:
> > Running on EC2, it's kinda hard to get good information from a system
> > that won't boot. The machine won't boot to the point of being able to
> > capture the syst
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 2:49 AM Scott Talbert wrote:
>
> I'm orphaning poco: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/poco
>
> I'm not sure why I picked it up originally - I don't use it. It currently
> FTBFS in rawhide due to OpenSSL 3.0 (and can't be fixed easily by going
> back to OpenSSL 1.1 because
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> By the way, SOVERSION can consist of more than one digit. It can be
> 0.5.2 and this is not an error:
> https://autotools.io/libtool/version.html
Other build systems such as CMake are even more flexible than libtool and
allow arbitrary combinations of major versi
Michal Srb wrote:
> Unlike RPM repositories, Maven repositories can easily hold multiple
> versions of libraries. Once a JAR is built, the resulting bytecode will
> work with current and future JVMs. There is no need to mass-rebuild JARs
> every 6 months. And there is certainly no need to try to ru
Have there been updated F35 wireplumber packages pushed somewhere? I haven't
seen anything on Bodhi this week, so I have not done any testing. I see the
meeting is scheduled for tomorrow morning in my timezone, so it's likely that I
(and potentially many others) will be not be able to test wirep
On Wed, 2021-10-06 at 15:41 -0500, Joe Doss wrote:
>
> > Does anybody know how to fix a currently broken instance and can
> > share
> > their solution?
>
> Is there anything on the console log when you reboot it after the
> updates? If you can share the log that would be helpful.
There's the ne
I'm out of the office on Friday, so you get tomorrow's blocker summary
today! Two notes:
1. This is a big list, so some bugs may have changed status while I
was working on it.
2. Go/No-Go for the early target date is a week from today. Happy bug squashing!
Action summary
Acc
Hi,
I contacted the maintainers of a golang package using
$package-maintain...@fedoraproject.org and got a bounce response from
an email that I understand is part of go-sig:
ext-mx.corp.redhat.com[10.4.204.10] said: 554 5.7.1 :
Recipient address rejected: Access denied (in reply to RCPT TO comman
I'm orphaning poco: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/poco
I'm not sure why I picked it up originally - I don't use it. It currently
FTBFS in rawhide due to OpenSSL 3.0 (and can't be fixed easily by going
back to OpenSSL 1.1 because one of its other BR's requires OpenSSL 3.0).
Nothing in Fe
On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 1:30 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 1:50 PM Josh Stone wrote:
> >
> > On 10/4/21 12:12 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 3:07 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >> * How good is emulation support
> > >
> > > The lack of real hardware for RISC-V has
Le lundi 04 octobre 2021 à 14:36 +0200, Miro Hrončok a écrit :
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://fe
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20211004.0):
ID: 1018548 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1018548
ID: 1018563
On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 18:23:00 +0200,
Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 07. 10. 21 17:45, Ben Cotton wrote:
* We suggest users to remove packages that are no longer maintained
and may contain security vulnerabilities.
This makes perfect sense.
* We make sure that archaic packages do not break upgra
On 29. 09. 21 19:08, Ben Cotton wrote:
Fedora have a 6 months cycle, PHP and a 1 year, common practice for some years
There seem to be some errors in this sentence.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel
On 07. 10. 21 17:45, Ben Cotton wrote:
* We suggest users to remove packages that are no longer maintained
and may contain security vulnerabilities.
This makes perfect sense.
* We make sure that archaic packages do not break upgrade between two
versions of Fedora.
When are you supposed to r
On 07/10/2021 17:45, Ben Cotton wrote:
Subpackage `remove-retired-packages` has been created (subpackage of
`fedora-upgrade`).
I suggest integrating this functionality into dnf as a plugin.
Example:
sudo dnf clean-retired --releasever=32
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 13/204 (x86_64), 10/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20211006.n.0):
ID: 1017531 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1017531
ID: 1017554 Test:
On 02/10/2021 15:27, James Szinger wrote:
These days, I think FreeIPA or Active Directory are the best choices,
but both are complicated and possibly too much for a SO/HO, workgroup,
or departmental sysadmin. AD has the advantage of supporting Windows,
MacOS, and Samba; the last time I looked Fr
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetiredPackages
== Summary ==
Easy the task of removing packages, which were retired and no longer
receives updates.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:msuchy| Miroslav Suchý]]
* Email: msu...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
This follows the [[Changes/Fedor
On 10/5/21 04:39, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 12:07:30PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 01:03:27PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
Hi all! I just got back from Open Source Summit, several of the talks I
found interesting were on RISC-V -- a high-level one
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20211005.0):
ID: 1017889 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1017889
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests comple
OLD: Fedora-35-20211006.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20211007.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 4
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Hi everyone,
It's that time already! The Fedora Linux 35 Fina Go/No-Go[1] meeting
is scheduled for Thursday 14 October at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting.
At this time, we will determine the status of the F35 Final for the 19
October early target date[2]. For more information about the Go/No-Go
meetin
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 35 RC 20211007.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_pl
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2021-10-08 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9920/
___
devel mailin
Hi everyone,
This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering) Team.
If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this report or
contact us on `#redhat-cpe` channel on libera.chat.
- If you wish to read this in rendered markdown, check the post on
discussion
Hi!
I've updated flite from the ancient 1.3 to 2.2 in rawhide and I'm
rebuilding speech-dispatcher in a side-tag (f36-build-side-46691). The
other consumer is fawkes, which I'm not rebuilding as it doesn't use any
of the new symbols and it should run with either 1.3 or 2.2 installed.
flite 2.1 dr
I've just orphaned package perl-Nagios-Plugin.
It was removed from CPAN by request of Nagios Enterprises, succeeded by
Monitoring::Plugin which is in Fedora.
Jitka
--
Jitka Plesnikova
Software Engineer
Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.f
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211006.0):
ID: 1017449 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 10/7/21 3:52 AM, Richard Fearn wrote:
> There is an issue with Xen instances (e.g. t2.small) - see
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010058.
>
> What I saw was that it would hang for a couple of minutes waiting for
> the disk to appear, then give up and go into emergency mode.
>
>
> Am 06.10.2021 um 17:04 schrieb Mikolaj Izdebski :
>
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 1:27 PM Peter Boy wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Am 04.10.2021 um 15:29 schrieb Mikolaj Izdebski :
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 2:08 PM Peter Boy wrote:
However, we lack concepts on how to proceed after removing jav
There is an issue with Xen instances (e.g. t2.small) - see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010058.
What I saw was that it would hang for a couple of minutes waiting for
the disk to appear, then give up and go into emergency mode.
The workaround is to edit the Dracut script that decid
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211006.0):
ID: 1017316 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Dne 06. 10. 21 v 20:06 Stephen Snow napsal(a):
On Wed, 2021-10-06 at 18:39 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
--snip--
So it
seems we are in agreement with the `dummy-onboarding-` prefix
No, it should be something more appropriate like `entry-level-tutor-`
Keep it coming please :)
or something e
On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 12:46:11AM -0400, Christopher wrote:
> Running on EC2, it's kinda hard to get good information from a system
> that won't boot. The machine won't boot to the point of being able to
> capture the system log, and the screenshot of the instance doesn't
> appear to be super help
What appears to be our nightly AMI build for F34 with updates
(125523088429/Fedora-Cloud-Base-34-20211006.0.x86_64-hvm-us-east-1-gp2-0)
won't even start once (no updating required; it's immediately broken).
The attachment won't go through on this list, but I
captured the last lines from the system
40 matches
Mail list logo
