On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 3:03 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> I've checked the status quo.
>
> Package "reproducer_reversed" starts supplementing package "rpm". "rpm" is
> installed, but "reproducer_reversed" is not.
>
> 1. dnf upgarde, no rpm update available: reproducer_reversed is not pulled
> in
> 2.
On Tue, 2021-09-28 at 14:57 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm not familiar with packaging stuff like this so could use some
> pointers:
>
> https://github.com/nwjs/nw.js
>
> This is actually a prereq for another application I'd like to get in
> Fedora.
you can try use nodejs-packaging-bundler
I was provided a link for how to build... It looks "fun"...
https://nwjs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/For%20Developers/Building%20NW.js/#building-nwjs
Looks like the forked V8 as well.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I'm not familiar with packaging stuff like this so could use some pointers:
https://github.com/nwjs/nw.js
This is actually a prereq for another application I'd like to get in Fedora.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
Hi all,
Fedora Linux 35 Beta was released today [1]. Our Fedora CoreOS `next` stream
has been migrated to Fedora Linux 35 content. Existing nodes on the `next`
stream will update as normal over the following days. Please test it out and
report any issues in our issue tracker [2].
Thank you to eve
Hello everyone,
I'm Alberto from the Mindshare Committee. We are looking to participate in the
Hacktoberfest[0] and solve some "easyfix" issues in our projects.
To accomplish this, we need:
* Set up push mirror from stub GitHub repositories to actual Pagure
repositories for the participant's P
Hi
I've got one last package needed for the mingw-sip-6.x upgrade:
mingw-python-pyqt5-sip -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2008646
It's a trivial mingw-python package. Happy to review in exchange!
Sandro
___
devel mailing list
On 9/27/21 8:31 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:15:32PM +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
>> On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 12:07, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> A question about this which is semi-related to your email.
>>>
>>> For some C library packages we have Java bindings, eg:
>
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 05:25:33PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 08:40:08AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 11:58:44AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > OCaml 4.13 has just come out and we'll be rebuilding all the OCaml
> > > packages in Rawhi
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 10/204 (x86_64), 6/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210927.n.0):
ID: 1004738 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_resize_lvm
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1004738
ID: 1004751 Test: x86_64
> Yeah, there's good tooling support for packaging software that uses
> ant and maven.
> And ant and maven themselves will also continue to be maintained by
> Mikolaj, as far as I know.
> Projects that use "pure" ant or maven to handle their dependencies and
> build are *very easy* to package for F
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 9:09 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Christopher:
>
> > My main point here was that treating the community as a single SIG
> > makes no more sense than treating all packages whose software is
> > written in C as a single "C SIG" community. It's too overwhelming for
> > peopl
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora Source-git SIG on 2021-09-29 from 14:30:00 to 15:30:00 GMT
At meet.google.com/mic-otnv-kse
The meeting will be about:
Bi-weekly meeting of the Fedora source-git SIG
Agenda:
https://pagure.io/fedora-source-git/sig/issues?tags=meeting&s
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 2:26 PM Robert Marcano via devel
wrote:
>
> On 9/27/21 7:54 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > Robert Marcano via devel wrote:
> >> I think the only way the Java ecosystem to survive in Fedora outside of
> >> OpenJDK and some core components is to allow bundling (Even Ja
Fedora Linux 35 Beta Released
--
The Fedora Project is pleased to announce the immediate availability
of Fedora 35 Beta, the next step towards our planned Fedora 35 release
at the end of October.
Download the prerelease from our Get Fedora site:
* Get Fedor
OLD: Fedora-35-20210927.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20210928.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MIS
On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at 08:20, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 02:06:58PM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > OCaml library code can in principle be dynamically linked, eg:
> > >
> > > $ rpm -ql ocaml-extlib | grep cmxs
> > > /usr/lib64/oc
On 9/27/21 7:54 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Robert Marcano via devel wrote:
I think the only way the Java ecosystem to survive in Fedora outside of
OpenJDK and some core components is to allow bundling (Even JavaScript
bundling is already allowed), but how do to it without compromising
sec
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 02:00:58PM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Interesting. Could you provide an example of such a dynamically linked
> > binary?
>
> OCaml is interesting in that it does not use standard ELF .so files, but its
> own dynamic linking mechanism
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 02:06:58PM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > OCaml library code can in principle be dynamically linked, eg:
> >
> > $ rpm -ql ocaml-extlib | grep cmxs
> > /usr/lib64/ocaml/extlib/extLib.cmxs
> > $ file /usr/lib64/ocaml/extlib/extLib.cmxs
>
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> OCaml library code can in principle be dynamically linked, eg:
>
> $ rpm -ql ocaml-extlib | grep cmxs
> /usr/lib64/ocaml/extlib/extLib.cmxs
> $ file /usr/lib64/ocaml/extlib/extLib.cmxs
> /usr/lib64/ocaml/extlib/extLib.cmxs: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64,
> versio
Florian Weimer wrote:
> Interesting. Could you provide an example of such a dynamically linked
> binary?
OCaml is interesting in that it does not use standard ELF .so files, but its
own dynamic linking mechanism (those .cma files).
This is a typical OCaml library (the ocaml-facile constraint sa
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 01:42:44PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Kevin Kofler via devel:
>
> > Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> >> * Kevin Kofler via devel:
> >>
> >>> (And for the record, I also think that Go and Rust should not work
> >>> that way either! It is possible to build shared libraries
* Kevin Kofler via devel:
> Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> * Kevin Kofler via devel:
>>
>>> (And for the record, I also think that Go and Rust should not work
>>> that way either! It is possible to build shared libraries of Go code,
>>> at least one Go toolchain supports it.)
>>
>> There is no stabl
Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Kevin Kofler via devel:
>
>> (And for the record, I also think that Go and Rust should not work
>> that way either! It is possible to build shared libraries of Go code,
>> at least one Go toolchain supports it.)
>
> There is no stable Go ABI. Even minor updates change
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210927.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210928.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 52
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 12.35 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
* Kevin Kofler via devel:
> (And for the record, I also think that Go and Rust should not work
> that way either! It is possible to build shared libraries of Go code,
> at least one Go toolchain supports it.)
There is no stable Go ABI. Even minor updates change ABI because type
sizes and struct
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64), 1/8 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210927.0):
ID: 1004339 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 11:58 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 17. 09. 21 11:07, Sahana Prasad wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > The side-tag was merged yesterday. OpenSSL 3.0.0 is available in rawhide
> now.
> > You can continue to port your changes for OpenSSL 3.0.0 now.
> >
> > The following packages F
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210927.0):
ID: 1004257 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
W dniu 22.09.2021 o 21:07, Julian Sikorski pisze:
Am 22.09.21 um 19:38 schrieb Fabio Valentini:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 6:35 PM Julian Sikorski
wrote:
W dniu 21.09.2021 o 23:12, Richard W.M. Jones pisze:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 10:16:17PM +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 21.09.2021 o 11
32 matches
Mail list logo
